AjzenI. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 27–58.
2.
AlbrechtsenJ.S.MeissnerC.A.SusaK.J. (2009). Can intuition improve deception detection performance?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1052–1055.
3.
AllwoodC.M.GranhagP.A. (1999). Feelings of confidence and the realism of confidence judgments in everyday life. In JuslinP.MontgomeryH. (Eds.), Judgment and decision making: Neo-Brunswikian and process-tracing approaches (pp. 123–146). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4.
AmbadyN.BernieriF.J.RichesonJ.A. (2000). Toward a histology of social behaviour: Judgmental accuracy from thin slices of the behavioural stream. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 201–271.
5.
AndersonC.A.LepperM.R.RossL. (1980). Perseverance of social theories: The role of explanation in the persistence of discredited information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1037–1049.
6.
AndersonD.E.AnsfieldM.E.DePauloB.M. (1999). Love’s best habit: Deception in the context of relationships. In PhilippotP.FeldmanR.S.CoatsE.J. (Eds.), The social context of nonverbal behavior (pp. 372–409). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
7.
AndersonD.E.DePauloB.M.AnsfieldM.E.TickleJ.J.GreenE. (1999). Beliefs about cues to deception: Mindless stereotypes or untapped wisdom?Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour, 23, 67–89.
8.
ArntzenF. (1970). Psychologie der Zeugenaussage [Psychology of testimony]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
9.
ArntzenF. (1982). Die Situation der forensischen Aussagenpsychologie in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. In TrankellA. (Ed.), Reconstructing the past: The role of psychologists in criminal trials (pp. 107–120). Deventer, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
10.
ArntzenF. (1983). Psychologie der Zeugenaussage: Systematik der Glaubwürdigkeitsmerkmale [Psychology of testimony: A systematic approach of credibility assessment]. München, Germany: Beck.
11.
BackbierE.HoogstratenJ.Meerum Terwogt-KouwenhovenK. (1997). Situational determinants of the acceptability of telling lies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1048–1062.
12.
BageleyJ.ManelisL. (1979). Effect of awareness on an indicator of cognitive load. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 49, 591–594.
13.
BaldryA.C.WinkelF.W. (1998). Perceptions of the credibility and eventual value of victim and suspect statements in interviews. In BorosJ.MunnichI.SzegediM. (Eds.), Psychology and criminal justice: International review of theory and practice (pp. 74–82). Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter.
14.
BaldryA.C.WinkelF.W.EnthovenD.S. (1997). Paralinguistic and nonverbal triggers of biased credibility assessments of rape victims in Dutch police officers: An experimental study of “nonevidentiary” bias. In RedondoS.GarridoV.PerzeJ.BarbaretR. (Eds.), Advances in psychology and law (pp. 163–174). Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter.
15.
BarM.NetaM.LinzH. (2006). Very first impressions. Emotion, 6, 269–278.
16.
BarrettE.C. (2005). Psychological research and police investigations: Does the research meet the needs? In AlisonL. (Ed.), The forensic psychologist’s casebook (pp. 47–67). Devon, England: Willan.
17.
BaumeisterR.F. (1998). The self. In GilbertD.T.FiskeS.T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 680–740).
Boston: McGraw-Hill.
18.
BavelasJ.B.ChovilN. (2006). Nonverbal and verbal communication: Hand gestures and facial displays as part of language use in face-to-face dialogue. In ManusovV.PattersonM.L. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of nonverbal communication (pp. 97–115). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
BavelasJ.B.ChovilN.CoatesL.RoeL. (1995). Gestures specialized for dialogue. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 394–405.
20.
BavelasJ.B.GerwingJ. (2007). Conversational hand gestures and facial displays in face-to-face dialogue. In FiedlerK. (Ed.), Frontiers of social psychology: Social communication (pp. 283–307). New York: Psychology Press.
21.
BeattieG.W. (1981). A further investigation of the cognitive interference hypothesis of gaze patterns during conversation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 243–248.
22.
BellK.L.DePauloB.M. (1996). Liking and lying. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 18, 243–266.
23.
BlairJ.P.KooiB. (2004). The gap between training and research in the detection of deception. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 6, 77–83.
24.
BokS. (1989). Lying: Moral choice in public and private life. New York: Random House.
25.
BollingmoG.WesselE.SandvoldY.EilertsenD.E.MagnussenS. (2009). The effect of biased and non-biased information on judgements of witness credibility. Psychology, Crime & Law, 15, 61–71.
26.
BondC.F. (2008). A few can catch a liar, sometimes. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 1298–1300.
27.
BondC.F.DePauloB.M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgements. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 214–234.
28.
BondC.F.DePauloB.M. (2008). Individual differences in judging deception: Accuracy and bias. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 477–492.
29.
BondC.F.FaheyW.E. (1987). False suspicion and the misperception of deceit. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 41–46.
30.
BondC.F.UysalA. (2007). On lie detection “wizards.”Law and Human Behavior, 31, 109–115.
31.
BondG.D. (2009). Deception detection expertise. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 339–351.
32.
BondG.D.MalloyD.M.ThompsonL.A.AriasE.A.NunnS. (2004). Post-probe decision making in a prison context. Communication Monographs, 71, 269–285.
33.
BothwellR.JalilM. (1992). The credibility of nervous witnesses. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 7, 581–586.
34.
BrantC. (1993). Communication patterns in Indians: Verbal and non-verbal. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 6, 259–269.
35.
BullP. (2009). Detecting deceit: Current issues. In WilliamsonT.MilneB.SavageS.P. (Eds.), International developments in investigative interviewing (pp. 190–206). Cullompton, England: Willan.
36.
BullR.McAlpineS. (1998). Facial appearance and criminality. In MemonA.VrijA.BullR. (Eds.), Psychology and law: Truthfulness, accuracy and credibility (pp. 59–76). London: McGraw-Hill.
37.
BullerD.B.AuneR.K. (1988). The effects of vocalics and nonverbal sensitivity on compliance: A speech accommodation theory explanation. Human Communication Research, 14, 301–332.
38.
BullerD.B.BurgoonJ.K. (1996). Interpersonal deception theory. Communication Theory, 6, 203–242.
39.
BullerD.B.ComstockJ.AuneR.K.StrzyzewskiK.D. (1989). The effect of probing on deceivers and truthtellers. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 13, 155–170.
40.
BullerD.B.StrzyzewskiK.D.ComstockJ. (1991). Interpersonal deception: I. Deceivers' reactions to receivers' suspicions and probing. Communication Monographs, 58, 1–24.
41.
BurgessA.W. (1985). Rape and sexual assault: A research book. London: Garland.
42.
BurgessA.W.HomstromL.L. (1974). Rape: Victims of crisis. Bowie, MD: Brady.
43.
BurgoonJ.K.BlairJ.P.StromR.E. (2008). Cognitive biases and nonverbal cue availability in deception detection. Human Communication Research, 34, 572–599.
44.
BurgoonJ.K.BullerD.B. (1994). Interpersonal deception: III. Effects of deceit on perceived communication and nonverbal dynamics. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 18, 155–184.
45.
BurgoonJ.K.BullerD.B.FloydK.GrandpreJ. (1996). Deceptive realities: Sender, receiver, and observer perspectives in deceptive conversations. Communication Research, 23, 724–748.
46.
BurgoonJ.K.BullerD.B.WhiteC.H.AfifiW.BusligA.L.S. (1999). The role of conversation involvement in deceptive interpersonal interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 669–685.
47.
CasoL.MaricchioloF.BonaiutoM.VrijA.MannS. (2006). The impact of deception and suspicion on different hand movements. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 30, 1–19.
48.
CasoL.VrijA.MannS.de LeoG. (2006). Deceptive responses: The impact of verbal and nonverbal countermeasures. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11, 99–111.
49.
CohenJ. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
50.
ColwellL.H.MillerH.A.LyonsP.M.MillerR.S. (2006). The training of law enforcement officers in detecting deception: A survey of current practices and suggestions for improving accuracy. Police Quarterly, 9, 275–290.
51.
DaltonA.L.DanemanM. (2006). Social suggestibility to central and peripheral misinformation. Memory, 14, 486–501.
52.
DarleyJ.M.GrossP.H. (1983). A hypothesis-confirming bias in labelling effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 20–33.
53.
DaviesG.M. (1991). Research on children’s testimony: Implications for interviewing practice. In HollinC.R.HowellsK. (Eds.), Clinical approaches to sex offenders and their victims (pp. 177–191). New York: Wiley.
54.
DavisM.HadiksD. (1995). Demeanor and credibility. Semiotica, 106, 5–54.
55.
DePauloB.M. (1992). Nonverbal behavior and self-presentation. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 203–243.
56.
DePauloB.M. (2004). The many faces of lies. In MillerA.G. (Ed.), The social psychology of good and evil (pp. 303–236). New York: Guilford Press.
57.
DePauloB.M.BlankA.L.SwaimG.W.HairfieldJ.G. (1992). Expressiveness and expressive control. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 276–285.
58.
DePauloB.M.CharltonK.CooperH.LindsayJ. L.MuhlenbruckL. (1997). The accuracy–confidence correlation in the detection of deception. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 346–357.
59.
DePauloB.M.EpsteinJ.A.LeMayC.S. (1990). Responses of the socially anxious to the prospect of interpersonal evaluation. Journal of Personality, 58, 623–640.
60.
DePauloB.M.FriedmanH.S. (1998). Nonverbal communication. In GilbertD.T.FiskeS.T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 3–40). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
61.
DePauloB.M.KashyD.A.KirkendolS.E.WyerM.M.EpsteinJ.A. (1996). Lying in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 979–995.
62.
DePauloB.M.KirkendolS.E. (1989). The motivational impairment effect in the communication of deception. In YuilleJ.C. (Ed.), Credibility assessment (pp. 51–70). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
63.
DePauloB.M.KirkendolS.E.TangJ.O’BrienT.P. (1988). The motivational impairment effect in the communication of deception: Replications and extensions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12, 177–202.
64.
DePauloB.M.LanierK.DavisT. (1983). Detecting deceit of the motivated liar. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1096–1103.
65.
DePauloB.M.LeMayC.S.EpsteinJ.A. (1991). Effects of importance of success and expectations for success on effectiveness at deceiving. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 14–24.
66.
DePauloB.M.LindsayJ.L.MaloneB.E.MuhlenbruckL.CharltonK.CooperH. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74–118.
67.
DePauloB.M.PfeiferR.L. (1986). On-the-job experience and skill at detecting deception. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 249–267.
68.
DePauloB.M.RosenthalR.EisenstatR.A.RogersP.L.FinkelsteinS. (1978). Decoding discrepant nonverbal cues. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 313–323.
69.
DePauloB.M.StoneJ.I.LassiterG.D. (1985). Telling ingratiating lies: Effects of target sex and target attractiveness on verbal and nonverbal deceptive success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1191–1203.
70.
Doherty-SneddonG.BruceV.BonnerL.LongbothamS.DoyleC. (2002). Development of gaze aversion as disengagement of visual information. Developmental Psychology, 38, 438–445.
71.
Doherty-SneddonG.PhelpsF.G. (2005). Gaze aversion: A response to cognitive or social difficulty?Memory and Cognition, 33, 727–733.
72.
DumasR.TestéB. (2006). The influence of criminal facial stereotypes on juridic judgments. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 65, 237–244.
73.
EkmanP. (1997). Deception, lying, and demeanor. In HalpernD.F.VoiskounskyA.E. (Eds.), States of mind: American and post-Soviet perspectives on contemporary issues in psychology (pp. 93–105). New York: Oxford University Press.
74.
EkmanP. (2001). Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics and marriage. New York: Norton. (Original work published 1985).
75.
EkmanP.FriesenW.V. (1969). Nonverbal leakage and clues to deception. Psychiatry, 32, 88–106.
76.
EkmanP.O’SullivanM. (1991). Who can catch a liar?American Psychologist, 46, 913–920.
77.
EkmanP.O’SullivanM. (2006). From flawed self-assessment to blatant whoppers: The utility of voluntary and involuntary behavior in detecting deception. Behavioural Sciences & the Law, 24, 673–686.
78.
EkmanP.O’SullivanM.FrankM.G. (1999). A few can catch a liar. Psychological Science, 10, 263–266.
79.
EkmanP.O’SullivanM.FrankM.G. (2008). Scoring and reporting: A response to Bond (2008). Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 1315–1317.
80.
EkmanP.O’SullivanM.FriesenW.V.SchererK. (1991). Face, voice, and body in detecting deceit. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 15, 125–135.
81.
ElaadE. (2003). Effects of feedback on the overestimated capacity to detect lies and the underestimated ability to tell lies. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 349–363.
82.
FeeleyT.H.YoungM.J. (2000). The effects of cognitive capacity on beliefs about deceptive communication. Communication Quarterly, 48, 101–119.
83.
FeldmanS.S.CauffmanE. (1999). Sexual betrayal among late adolescents: Perspectives of the perpetrator and the aggrieved. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 28, 235–258.
84.
FiedlerK.WalkaI. (1993). Training lie detectors to use nonverbal cues instead of global heuristics. Human Communication Research, 20, 199–223.
85.
FisherR.P.BrennanK.H.McCauleyM.R. (2002). The cognitive interview method to enhance eyewitness recall. In EisenM.L.QuasJ.A.GoodmanG.S. (Eds.), Memory and suggestibility in the forensic interview (pp. 265–286). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
86.
FisherR.P.VrijA.LeinsD.A. (in press). Inconsistency as a predictor of memory inaccuracy and lying. In CooperB.S.GrieselD.TernesM. (Eds.), Applied issues in investigative interviewing, eyewitness memory, and credibility assessment. New York, NY: Springer.
87.
FordE.B. (2006). Lie detection: Historical, neuropsychiatric and legal dimensions. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 29, 159–177.
88.
FowlerK.A.LilienfeldS.O.PatrickC.J. (2009). Detecting psychopathy from thin slices of behavior. Psychological Assessment, 21, 68–78.
89.
FrankM.G.EkmanP. (1997). The ability to detect deceit generalizes across different types of high-stake lies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1429–1439.
90.
FrankM.G.FeeleyT.H. (2003). To catch a liar: Challenges for research in lie detection training. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 31, 58–75.
91.
FrankM.G.YarbroughJ.D.EkmanP. (2006). Investigative interviewing and the detection of deception. In WilliamsonT. (Ed.), Investigative interviewing: Rights, research and regulation (pp. 229–255). Cullompton, England: Willan.
92.
FreedmanN. (1972). The analysis of movement behavior during the clinical interview. In SiegmanA.R.PopeB. (Eds.), Studies in dyadic communication (pp. 153–175). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
93.
GanisG.KosslynS.M.StoseS.ThompsonW.L.Yurgelun-ToddD.A. (2003). Neural correlates of different types of deception: An fMRI investigation. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 830–836.
94.
GarridoE.MasipJ.HerreroC. (2004). Police officers' credibility judgements: Accuracy and estimated ability. International Journal of Psychology, 39, 254–275.
95.
GeiselmanR.E.CallotR. (1990). Reverse versus forward recall of script-based texts. Journal of Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, 141–144.
96.
GigerenzerG.ToddP.M.the ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
97.
GilbertD.T. (1991). How mental systems believe. American Psychologist, 46, 107–119.
98.
GilbertJ.A.E.FisherR.P. (2006). The effects of varied retrieval cues on reminiscence in eyewitness memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 723–739.
99.
GilovichT.SavitskyK.MedvecV.H. (1998). The illusion of transparency: Biased assessments of others' ability to read one’s emotional states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 332–346.
100.
GlenbergA.M.SchroederJ.L.RobertsonD.A. (1998). Averting the gaze disengages the environment and facilitates remembering. Memory & Cognition, 26, 651–658.
101.
The Global Deception Team. (2006). A world of lies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 60–74.
102.
GoodmanG.S.RudyL.BottomsB.AmanC. (1990). Children’s concerns and memory: Issues of ecological validity in the study of children’s eyewitness testimony. In FivushR.HudsonJ. (Eds.), Knowing and remembering in young children (pp. 249–284). New York: Cambridge University Press.
103.
GranhagP.A. (2010). On the psycho-legal study of true and false intentions: Dangerous waters and some stepping stones. The Open Criminology Journal, 3, 37–43.
104.
GranhagP.A.AnderssonL.O.StrömwallL.A.HartwigM. (2004). Imprisoned knowledge: Criminals' beliefs about deception. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9, 103–119.
105.
GranhagP.A.HartwigM. (2008). A new theoretical perspective on deception detection: On the psychology of instrumental mind-reading. Psychology, Crime & Law, 14, 189–200.
106.
GranhagP.A.KniepsM. (in press). Episodic future thought: Illuminating the trademarks of true and false intent. Applied Cognitive Psychology.
107.
GranhagP.A.StrömwallL.A. (1999). Repeated interrogations: Stretching the deception detection paradigm. Expert Evidence: The International Journal of Behavioural Sciences in Legal Contexts, 7, 163–174.
108.
GranhagP.A.StrömwallL.A. (2000a). “Let’s go over this again...”: Effects of repeated interrogations on deception detection performance. In CzeredereckaA.Jaskiewicz-ObydzinskaT.WojcikiewiczJ. (Eds.), Forensic psychology and law: Traditional questions and new ideas (pp. 191–196). Kraków, Poland: Institute of Forensic Research.
109.
GranhagP.A.StrömwallL.A. (2000b). Deception detection: Examining the consistency heuristic. In BreurC.M.KommerM.M.NijboerJ.F.ReintjesJ.M. (Eds.), New trends in criminal investigation and evidence (pp. 309–321). Vol. 2, Antwerpen, Belgium: Intresentia.
110.
GranhagP.A.StrömwallL.A. (2001). Deception detection: Interrogators' and observers' decoding of consecutive statements. The Journal of Psychology, 135, 603–620.
111.
GranhagP.A.StrömwallL.A. (2002). Repeated interrogations: Verbal and nonverbal cues to deception. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 243–257.
112.
GranhagP.A.StrömwallL.A. (2004). The detection of deception in forensic contexts. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
113.
GranhagP.A.StrömwallL.A.HartwigM. (2005). Granting asylum or not? Migration board personnel’s beliefs about deception. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 31, 29–50.
114.
GranhagP.A.StrömwallL.A.HartwigM. (2007). The SUE technique: The way to interview to detect deception. Forensic Update, 88, 25–29.
115.
GranhagP.A.StrömwallL.A.JonssonA.C. (2003). Partners in crime: How liars in collusion betray themselves. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 848–868.
116.
GranhagP.A.VrijA. (2010). Interviewing to detect deception. In GranhagP.A. (Ed.), Forensic psychology in context: Nordic and international approaches (pp. 75–93). Cullompton, England: Willan.
117.
GreelyH.IllesJ. (2007). Neuroscience-based lie detection: The urgent need for regulation. American Journal of Law and Medicine, 33, 377–431.
118.
GreuelL. (1992). Police officers' beliefs about cues associated with deception in rape cases. In LöselF.BenderD.BliesenerT. (Eds.), Psychology and law: International perspectives (pp. 234–239). Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter.
119.
GudjonssonG.H. (2003). The psychology of interrogations and confessions. Chichester, England: Wiley.
120.
HaleJ.L.StiffJ.B. (1990). Nonverbal primacy in veracity judgments. Communication Reports, 3, 75–83.
121.
HareR.D. (2006). Psychopathy: A clinical and forensic overview. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 29, 709–724.
122.
HartwigM.BondC.F. (2010). Why do lie-catchers fail? A Brunswikian lens model of human lie judgments. Manuscript submitted for publication.
123.
HartwigM.GranhagP.A.StrömwallL. (2007). Guilty and innocent suspects' strategies during interrogations. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 13, 213–227.
124.
HartwigM.GranhagP.A.StrömwallL.DoeringN. (2010). Impression and information management: On the strategic self-regulation of innocent and guilty suspects [Special issue]. The Open Criminology Journal, 3, 10–16.
125.
HartwigM.GranhagP.A.StrömwallL.KronkvistO. (2006). Strategic use of evidence during police interrogations: When training to detect deception works. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 603–619.
126.
HartwigM.GranhagP.A.StrömwallL.VrijA. (2005). Detecting deception via strategic disclosure of evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 469–484.
HirschA.R.WolfC.J. (2001). Practical methods for detecting mendacity: A case study. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 29, 438–444.
129.
HockingJ.E.LeathersD.G. (1980). Nonverbal indicators of deception: A new theoretical perspective. Communication Monographs, 47, 119–131.
130.
HorvathF.JayneB.BuckleyJ. (1994). Differentiation of truthful and deceptive criminal suspects in behavioral analysis interviews. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 39, 793–807.
JoffeR.YuilleJ.C. (1992, May). Criteria-based content analysis: An experimental investigation. Paper presented at the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Advanced Study Institute on the Child Witness in Context: Cognitive, Social and Legal Perspectives, Lucca, Italy.
133.
JohnsonR.R. (2006a). Confounding influences on police detection of suspiciousness. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 435–442.
134.
JohnsonR.R. (2006b). Race and police reliance on suspicious nonverbal cues. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 30, 277–290.
KalbfleischP.J. (1992). Deceit, distrust and the social milieu: Application of deception research in a troubled world. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 20, 308–334.
137.
KassinS.M. (2005). On the psychology of confessions: Does innocence put innocents at risk?American Psychologist, 60, 215–228.
138.
KassinS.M. (2008a). Confession evidence: Commonsense myths and misconceptions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 1309–1322.
139.
KassinS.M. (2008b). The psychology of confessions. Annual Review of Law and Social Sciences, 4, 193–217.
140.
KassinS.M.ApplebyS.C.Torkildson-PerilloJ. (2010). Interviewing suspects: Practice, science, and future directions. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15, 39–56.
141.
KassinS.M.FongC.T. (1999). “I’m innocent!”: Effects of training on judgments of truth and deception in the interrogation room. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 499–516.
142.
KassinS.M.GoldsteinC.J.SavitskyK. (2003). Behavioral confirmation in the interrogation room: On the dangers of presuming guilt. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 187–203.
143.
KassinS.M.GudjonssonG.H. (2004). The psychology of confessions: A review of the literature and issues. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 33–67.
144.
KassinS.M.MeissnerC.A.NorwickR.J. (2005). “I’d know a false confession if I saw one”: A comparative study of college students and police investigators. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 211–227.
145.
KassinS.M.NorwickR.J. (2004). Why people waive their Miranda rights: The power of innocence. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 211–221.
146.
KaufmannG.DrevlandG.C.WesselE.OverskeidG.MagnussenS. (2003). The importance of being earnest: Displayed emotions and witness credibility. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 21–34.
147.
KendonA. (1994). Do gestures communicate? A review. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 27, 175–200.
148.
KendonA. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
149.
KleinkeC L. (1986). Gaze and eye contact: A research review. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 78–100.
150.
KleinmuntzB.SzuckoJ. J. (1984). Lie detection in ancient and modern times: A call for contemporary scientific study. American Psychologist, 39, 766–776.
151.
KöhnkenG. (1987). Training police officers to detect deceptive eyewitness statements. Does it work?Social Behaviour, 2, 1–17.
152.
KöhnkenG. (2002). A German perspective on children’s testimony. In WestcottH.L.DaviesG.M.BullR.H.C. (Eds.), Children’s testimony: A handbook of psychological research and forensic practice (pp. 233–244). Chichester, England: Wiley.
153.
KöhnkenG. (2004). Statement validity analysis and the “detection of the truth.”. In GranhagP.A.StrömwallL.A. (Eds.), Deception detection in forensic contexts (pp. 41–63). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
154.
KowalskiR.M.WalkerS.WilkinsonR.QueenA.SharpeB. (2003). Lying, cheating, complaining, and other aversive interpersonal behaviors: A narrative examination of the darker side of relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20, 471–490.
155.
KraussR.M. (1981). Impression formation, impression management, and nonverbal behaviors. In HigginsE.T.HermanC.P.ZannaM.P. (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium (pp. 323–341). Vol. 1, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
156.
LaFranceM.MayoC. (1976). Racial differences in gaze behavior during conversations: Two systematic observational studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 547–552.
157.
LaFranceM.MayoC. (1978). Cultural aspects of nonverbal communication. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2, 71–89.
158.
LandryK.BrighamJ.C. (1992). The effect of training in criteria-based content analysis on the ability to detect deception in adults. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 663–675.
159.
LaneJ.D.DePauloB.M. (1999). Completing Coyne’s cycle: Dysphorics' ability to detect deception. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 311–329.
160.
LealS.VrijA.MannS.FisherR. (2010). Detecting true and false opinions: The Devil’s Advocate approach as a lie detection aid. Acta Psychologica, 134, 323–329.
161.
LearyM.R.KowalskiR.M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 34–47.
162.
LeinsD.FisherR.P.VrijA.LealS.MannS. (in press). Using sketch-drawing to induce inconsistency: An active approach to detecting deception. Legal and Criminological Psychology,
163.
LeoR.A. (1996). Inside the interrogation room. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86, 266–303.
164.
LernerM.J. (1980). The belief in a just world. New York: Plenum Press.
165.
LevineT.R.AsadaK.J.K.ParkH.S. (2006). The lying chicken and the gaze avoidant egg: Eye contact, deception and causal order. Southern Journal of Communication, 4, 401–411.
166.
LevineT.R.FeeleyT.H.McCornackS.A.HughesM.HarmsC.M. (2005). Testing the effects of nonverbal behavior training on accuracy in deception detection with the inclusion of a bogus training control group. Western Journal of Communication, 69, 203–217.
167.
LevineT.R.McCornackS.A. (1992). Linking love and lies: A formal test of the McCornack and Parks model of deception detection. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9, 143–154.
168.
LevineT.R.McCornackS.A. (1996a). A critical analysis of the behavioral adaptation explanation of the probing effect. Human Communication Research, 22, 575–588.
169.
LevineT.R.McCornackS.A. (1996b). Can behavioral adaptation explain the probing effect?Human Communication Research, 22, 604–613.
170.
LevineT.R.McCornackS.A. (2001). Behavioural adaptation, confidence, and heuristic-based explanations of the probing effect. Human Communication Research, 27, 471–502.
171.
LevineT.R.ParkH.S.McCornackS.A. (1999). Accuracy in detecting truths and lies: Documenting the “veracity effect.”Communication Monographs, 66, 125–144.
172.
LindholmT. (2008). Who can judge the accuracy of eyewitness statements? A comparison of professionals and lay-persons. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 1301–1314.
173.
LittmannE.SzewczykH. (1983). Zu einigen Kriterien und Ergebnissen forensisch-psychologischer Glaubwürdigkeitsbegutachtung von sexuell mißbrauchten Kindern und Jugendlichen [Criteria to be examined in forensic-psychological credibility assessment in child sexual abuse cases]. Forensia, 4, 55–72.
174.
LiuM, Granhag, P.A.LandströmS.Roos af HjelmsäterE.StrömwallL.A.VrijA. (2010). “Can you remember what was in your pocket when you were stung by a bee?”—Eliciting cues to deception by asking the unanticipated. The Open Criminology Journal, 3, 31–36.
175.
LoftusE.F. (2005). Planting misinformation in the human mind: A 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory. Learning and Memory, 12, 361–366.
176.
LoftusE.F.PalmerJ.C. (1974). Reconstructions of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 585–589.
177.
LordC.G.RossL.LepperM.R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098–2109.
178.
MacraeC.N.BodenhausenG.V. (2001). Social cognition: Categorical person perception. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 239–256.
179.
MaloneB.E.DePauloB.M. (2001). Measuring sensitivity to deception. In HallJ.A.BernieriF.J. (Eds.), Interpersonal sensitivity: Theory and measurement (pp. 103–124). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
180.
MannS.VrijA.BullR. (2002). Suspects, lies and videotape: An analysis of authentic high-stakes liars. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 365–376.
181.
MannS.VrijA.BullR. (2004). Detecting true lies: Police officers' ability to detect deceit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 137–149.
182.
MasipJ.SporerS.GarridoE.HerreroC. (2005). The detection of deception with the reality monitoring approach: A review of the empirical evidence. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 11, 99–122.
183.
MatarazzoJ.D.WiensA.N.JacksonR.H.ManaughT.S. (1970). Interviewee speech behavior under conditions of endogenously-present and exogenously-induced motivational states. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 26, 17–24.
184.
McNeillD. (1985). So you think gestures are nonverbal?Psychological Review, 92, 350–371.
185.
McNeillD. (1992). Hand and mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
186.
MeissnerC.A.KassinS.M. (2002). “He’s guilty!”: Investigator bias in judgments of truth and deception. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 469–480.
187.
MillarM.G.MillarK.U. (1998). The effects of suspicion on the recall of cues used to make veracity judgments. Communication Reports, 11, 57–64.
188.
MillerG.R.StiffJ.B. (1993). Deceptive communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
189.
MostonS.J. (1992). Truth or lies. Policing, 8, 26–39.
190.
MostonS.J.EngelbergT. (1993). Police questioning techniques in tape recorded interviews with criminal suspects. Policing and Society, 6, 61–75.
191.
MostonS.J.StephensonG.M.WilliamsonT.M. (1992). The effects of case characteristics on suspect behaviour during police questioning. British Journal of Criminology, 32, 23–39.
192.
National Research Council. (2003). The polygraph and lie detection. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
193.
NollerP. (1985). Video primacy—A further look. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 9, 28–47.
194.
OfsheR.J.LeoR.A. (1997). The decision to confess falsely: Rational choice and irrational action. Denver University Law Review, 74, 979–1112.
195.
O’SullivanM. (2007). Unicorns or Tiger Woods: Are lie detection experts myths or rarities? A response to “On Lie Detection ‘Wizards’” by Bond and Uysal. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 117–123.
196.
O’SullivanM. (2008). Home runs and humbugs: Comment on Bond and DePaulo (2008). Psychological Bulletin, 134, 493–497.
197.
O’SullivanM.EkmanP. (2004). The wizards of deception detection. In GranhagP.A.StrömwallL.A. (Eds.), Deception detection in forensic contexts (pp. 269–286). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
198.
O’SullivanM.EkmanP.FriesenW.V. (1988). The effect of comparisons on detecting deceit. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12, 203–216.
199.
O’SullivanM.FrankM.G.HurleyC.M.TiwanaJ. (in press). Police lie detection accuracy: The effect of lie scenario. Law and Human Behavior,
200.
ParkH.S.LevineT.R.McCornackS.A.MorrissonK.FerraraM. (2002). How people really detect lies. Communication Monographs, 69, 144–157.
201.
PattersonM.L. (1995). Invited article: A parallel process model of nonverbal communication. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 19, 3–29.
202.
PattersonM.L. (2006). The evolution of theories of interactive behavior. In ManusovV.PattersonM.L. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of nonverbal communication (pp. 21–39). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
203.
PickelK.L. (2004). When a lie becomes the truth: The effects of self-generated misinformation on eyewitness memory. Memory, 12, 14–26.
204.
PorterS.EnglandL.JuodisM.ten BrinkeL.WilsonK. (2008). Is the face the window to the soul?: Investigation of the accuracy of intuitive judgments of the trustworthiness of human faces. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 40, 171–177.
205.
PorterS.GustawC.ten BrinkeL. (2010). Dangerous decisions: The impact of first impressions of trustworthiness on the evaluation of legal evidence and defendant culpability. Psychology Crime & Law, 16, 477–491.
206.
PorterS.JuodisM.ten BrinkeL.KleinR.WilsonK. (2010). Evaluation of a brief deception detection training program. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 21, 66–76.
207.
PorterS.PeaceK. (2007). The scars of memory: A prospective, longitudinal investigation of the consistency of traumatic and positive emotional memories in adulthood. Psychological Science, 18, 435–441.
208.
PorterS.SpencerL.BirtA. (2003). Blinded by emotion? Effect of emotionality of a scene on susceptibility to false memories. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 35, 165–175.
209.
PorterS.ten BrinkeL. (2008). Reading between the lies: Identifying concealed and falsified emotions in universal facial expressions. Psychological Science, 19, 508–514.
210.
PorterS.ten BrinkeL. (2009). Dangerous decisions: A theoretical framework for understanding how judges assess credibility in the courtroom. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 14, 119–134.
211.
PorterS.ten BrinkeL. (2010). Truth about lies: What works in detecting high-stakes deception? [Special issue]. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15, 57–76.
212.
PorterS.WoodworthM. (2007). I’m sorry I did it…but he started it: A comparison of the official and self-reported homicide descriptions of psychopath and non-psychopaths. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 91–107.
213.
PorterS.WoodworthM.BirtA.R. (2000). Truth, lies, and videotape: An investigation of the ability of federal parole officers to detect deception. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 643–658.
214.
PorterS.WoodworthM.McCabeS.PeaceK.A. (2007). “Genius is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration”…or is it? An investigation of the impact of motivation and feedback on deception detection. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 12, 297–310.
215.
PorterS.YuilleJ.C. (1995). Credibility assessment of criminal suspects through statement analysis. Psychology, Crime and Law, 1, 319–331.
216.
PorterS.YuilleJ.C. (1996). The language of deceit: An investigation of the verbal clues to deception in the interrogation context. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 443–459.
217.
PorterS.YuilleJ.C.LehmanD.R. (1999). The nature of real, implanted and fabricated memories for emotional childhood events: Implications for the recovered memory debate. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 517–537.
218.
QuasJ.A.DavisE.L.GoodmanG.S.MyersJ.E.B. (2007). Repeated questions, deception, and children’s true and false reports of body touch. Child Maltreatment, 12, 60–67.
219.
R. v. Lifchus, 3 S.C.R. 320 (1997).
220.
ReinhardM.A.SporerS.L. (2008). Verbal and nonverbal behaviour as a basis for credibility attribution: The impact of task involvement and cognitive capacity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 477–488.
221.
ReinhardM.A.SporerS.L.MarksteinerT. (2009). Situational familiarity and the use of nonverbal and verbal information in judgments of veracity. Manuscript under review.
222.
RiggioR.E. (1994). Epilogue: Where are we going, and how do we get there?Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 514–518.
223.
RiggioR.E.TuckerJ.ThrockmortonB. (1988). Social skills and deception ability. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 568–577.
224.
RobinsonW.P. (1994). Reactions to falsifications in public and interpersonal contexts. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 497–513.
225.
RoneyJ.R.HansonK.N.DuranteK.M.MaestripieriD. (2006). Reading men’s faces: Women’s mate attractiveness judgments track men’s testosterone and interest in infants. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 273, 2169–2175.
226.
RossL. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental psychology (pp. 174–221). Vol. 10, New York: Academic Press.
227.
RotenbergK.J.SullivanC. (2003). Children’s use of gaze and limb movement cues to infer deception. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 164, 175–187.
228.
RubyC.L.BrighamJ.C. (1997). The usefulness of the criteria-based content analysis technique in distinguishing between truthful and fabricated allegations. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 3, 705–737.
229.
SchacterD.L.AddisR.D. (2007). The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory: Remembering the past and imagining the future. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 392, 773–786.
230.
SchlenkerB.R.LearyM.R. (1982). Social anxiety and self-presentation: A conceptualization and model. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 641–669.
SchweitzerM.E.BrodtS.E.CrosonR.T.A. (2002). Seeing and believing: Visual access and the strategic use of deception. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 13, 258–275.
233.
SchweitzerM.E.HersheyJ.C.BradlowE.T. (2006). Promises and lies: Restoring violated trust. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 101, 1–9.
234.
SeiterJ.S.BruschkeJ.BaiC. (2002). The acceptability of deception as a function of perceivers' culture, deceiver’s intention, and deceiver–deceived relationship. Western Journal of Communication, 66, 158–180.
235.
SpenceS.A. (2008). Playing devil’s advocate: The case against fMRI lie detection. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 13, 11–26.
236.
SpenceS.A.FarrowT.F.D.HerfordA.E.WilkinsonI.D.ZhengY.WoodruffP.W.R. (2001). Behavioural and functional anatomical correlates of deception in humans. Neuroreport: For Rapid Communication of Neuroscience Research, 12, 2849–2853.
237.
SporerS.L. (2004). Reality monitoring and detection of deception. In GranhagP.A.StrömwallL.A. (Eds.), Deception detection in forensic contexts (pp. 64–102). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
238.
SporerS.L.PenrodS.D.ReadJ.D.CutlerB.L. (1995). Choosing, confidence, and accuracy: A meta-analysis of the confidence-accuracy relation in eyewitness identification studies. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 315–327.
239.
SporerS.L.SchwandtB. (2006). Paraverbal indicators of deception: A meta-analytic synthesis. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 421–446.
240.
SporerS.L.SchwandtB. (2007). Moderators of nonverbal indicators of deception: A meta-analytic synthesis. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 13, 1–34.
241.
StiffJ.B.CormanS.KrizekB.SniderE. (1994). Individual differences and changes in nonverbal behavior: Unmasking the changing faces of deception. Communication Research, 21, 555–581.
242.
StiffJ.B.KimH.J.RameshC.N. (1992). Truth biases and aroused suspicion in relational deception. Communication Research, 19, 326–345.
243.
StiffJ.B.MillerG.R. (1986). “Come to think of it...”: Interrogative probes, deceptive communication, and deception detection. Human Communication Research, 12, 339–357.
244.
StiffJ.B.MillerG.R.SleightC.MongeauP.GarlickR.RoganR. (1989). Explanations for visual cue primacy in judgments of honesty and deceit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 555–564.
StrömwallL.A.GranhagP.A. (2005). Children’s repeated lies and truths: Effects on adults' judgments and reality monitoring scores. Psychiatry, Psychology, & Law, 12, 345–356.
247.
StrömwallL.A.GranhagP.A. (2007). Detecting deceit in pairs of children. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 1285–1304.
248.
StrömwallL.A.GranhagP.A.HartwigM. (2004). Practitioners' beliefs about deception. In GranhagP.A.StrömwallL.A. (Eds.), Deception detection in forensic contexts (pp. 229–250). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
249.
StrömwallL.A.GranhagP.A.JonssonA.C. (2003). Deception among pairs: “Let’s say we had lunch together and hope they will swallow it.”. Psychology, Crime & Law, 9, 109–124.
250.
StrömwallL.AGranhagP.A.LandströmS. (2007). Children’s prepared and unprepared lies: Can adults see through their strategies?Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 457–471.
251.
TaylorR.HickR.F. (2007). Believed cues to deception: Judgments in self-generated serious and trivial situations. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 12, 321–332.
252.
TesserA. (1978). Self-generated attitude change. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 288–338). Vol. 11, New York: Academic Press.
253.
Tickle-DegnenL.RosenthalR. (1990). The nature of rapport and its nonverbal correlates. Psychological Inquiry, 1, 285–293.
254.
TodorovA. (2008). Evaluating faces on trustworthiness: An extension of systems for recognition of emotions signaling approach/avoidance behaviors. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124, 208–224.
255.
TorisC.DePauloB.M. (1984). Effects of actual deception and suspiciousness of deception on interpersonal perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1063–1073.
256.
TrankellA. (1972). Reliability of evidence. Stockholm, Sweden: Beckmans.
257.
TrovilloP.V. (1939). A history of lie detection. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 29, 848–881.
258.
TurnerR.E.EdgleyC.OlmsteadG. (1975). Information control in conversations: Honesty is not always the best policy. Kansas Journal of Sociology, 11, 69–89.
259.
UndeutschU. (1967). Beurteilung der Glaubhaftigkeit von Aussagen [Evaluation of the credibility of statements]. In UndeutschU. (Ed.), Handbuch der Psychologie Vol. 11: Forensische Psychologie[Handbook of Psychology Vol. 11: Forensic psychology] (pp. 26–181). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
260.
UndeutschU. (1982). Statement reality analysis. In TrankellA. (Ed.), Reconstructing the past: The role of psychologists in criminal trials (pp. 27–56). Deventer, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
261.
UndeutschU. (1984). Courtroom evaluation of eyewitness testimony. International Review of Applied Psychology, 33, 51–67.
262.
UndeutschU. (1989). The development of statement reality analysis. In YuilleJ. C. (Ed.), Credibility assessment (pp. 101–121). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
263.
Van RossumW. (1998). Verschijnen voor de rechter: Hoe het hoort en het ritueel van Turkse verdachten in de rechtszaal[Appearing before the court: How to behave and the ritual of Turkish defendants in the courtroom]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Uitgeverij Duizend & Een.
264.
VrijA. (1993). Credibility judgments of detectives: The impact of nonverbal behavior, social skills and physical characteristics on impression formation. Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 601–611.
265.
VrijA. (1994). The impact of information and setting on detection of deception by police detectives. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 18, 117–137.
266.
VrijA. (1995). Behavioral correlates of deception in a simulated police interview. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 129, 15–29.
267.
VrijA. (2000). Telling and detecting lies as a function of raising the stakes. In BreurC.M.KommerM.M.NijboerJ.F.ReintjesJ.M. (Eds.), New trends in criminal investigation and evidence (Vol. 2, pp. 699–709). Antwerpen, Belgium: Intersentia.
268.
VrijA. (2004). Invited article: Why professionals fail to catch liars and how they can improve. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9, 159–181.
269.
VrijA. (2005). Criteria-based content analysis: A qualitative review of the first 37 studies. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 3–41.
270.
VrijA. (2006). Challenging interviewees during interviews: The potential effects on lie detection. Psychology, Crime & Law, 12, 193–206.
271.
VrijA. (2007). Deception: A social lubricant and a selfish act. In FiedlerK. (Ed.), Frontiers of social psychology: Social communication (pp. 309–342). New York: Psychology Press.
272.
VrijA. (2008a). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities. (2nd ed.).
Chichester, England: Wiley.
273.
VrijA. (2008b). Nonverbal dominance versus verbal accuracy in lie detection: A plea to change police practice. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 1323–1336.
274.
VrijA.AkehurstL.KnightS. (2006). Police officers', social workers', teachers' and the general public’s beliefs about deception in children, adolescents and adults. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11, 297–312.
275.
VrijA.AkehurstL.SoukaraS.BullR. (2002). Will the truth come out? The effect of deception, age, status, coaching, and social skills on CBCA scores. Law and Human Behaviour, 26, 261–283.
276.
VrijA.AkehurstL.SoukaraS.BullR. (2004a). Detecting deceit via analyses of verbal and nonverbal behavior in children and adults. Human Communication Research, 30, 8–41.
277.
VrijA.AkehurstL.SoukaraS.BullR. (2004b). Let me inform you how to tell a convincing story: CBCA and reality monitoring scores as a function of age, coaching and deception. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 36, 113–126.
278.
VrijA.DragtA.W.KoppelaarL. (1992). Interviews with ethnic interviewees: Nonverbal communication errors in impression formation. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 2, 199–209.
279.
VrijA.EdwardK.BullR. (2001). Stereotypical verbal and nonverbal responses while deceiving others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 899–909.
280.
VrijA.EdwardK.RobertsK.P.BullR. (2000). Detecting deceit via analysis of verbal and nonverbal behavior. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 24, 239–263.
281.
VrijA.EvansH.AkehurstL.MannS. (2004). Rapid judgements in assessing verbal and nonverbal cues: Their potential for deception researchers and lie detection. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 283–296.
282.
VrijA.FischerA. (1995). The expression of emotions in simulated rape interviews. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 10, 64–67.
283.
VrijA.FischerA. (1997). The role of displays of emotions and ethnicity in judgements of rape victims. International Review of Victimology, 4, 255–265.
284.
VrijA.GrahamS. (1997). Individual differences between liars and the ability to detect lies. Expert Evidence, 5, 144–148.
285.
VrijA.GranhagP.A. (2007). Interviewing to detect deception. In ChristiansonS.A. (Ed.), Offenders' memories of violent crimes (pp. 279–304). Chichester, England: Wiley.
286.
VrijA.GranhagP.A.MannS. (in press). Invited article: Good liars. Journal of Psychiatry and Law.
287.
VrijA.GranhagP.A.MannS.LealS. (in press). Lying about flying: The first experiment to detect false intent. Psychology, Crime & Law.
288.
VrijA.HardenF.TerryJ.EdwardK.BullR. (2001). The influence of personal characteristics, stakes and lie complexity on the accuracy and confidence to detect deceit. In RoeschR.CorradoR.R.DempsterR.J. (Eds.), Psychology in the courts: International advances in knowledge (pp. 289–304). London: Routledge.
289.
VrijA.KnellerW.MannS. (2000). The effect of informing liars about criteria-based content analysis on their ability to deceive CBCA-raters. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 5, 57–70.
290.
VrijA.LealS.GranhagP.A.MannS.FisherR.P.HillmanJ. (2009). Outsmarting the liars: The benefit of asking unanticipated questions. Law and Human Behavior, 33, 159–166.
291.
VrijA.LealS.MannS.GranhagP.A. (in press). A comparison between lying about intentions and past activities: Verbal cues and detection accuracy. Applied Cognitive Psychology.
292.
VrijA.LealS.MannS.WarmelinkL.GranhagP.A.FisherR.P. (2010). Drawings as an innovative and successful lie detection tool. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, 587–594.
293.
VrijA.MannS. (2001a). Telling and detecting lies in a high-stake situation: The case of a convicted murderer. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 187–203.
294.
VrijA.MannS. (2001b). Who killed my relative? Police officers' ability to detect real-life high-stake lies. Psychology, Crime & Law, 7, 119–132.
295.
VrijA.MannS. (2004). Detecting deception: The benefit of looking at a combination of behavioral, auditory and speech content related cues in a systematic manner. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13, 61–79.
296.
VrijA.MannS.FisherR. (2006a). An empirical test of the Behaviour Analysis Interview. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 329–345.
297.
VrijA.MannS.FisherR. (2006b). Information-gathering vs accusatory interview style: Individual differences in respondents' experiences. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 589–599.
298.
VrijA.MannS.FisherR.LealS.MilneB.BullR. (2008). Increasing cognitive load to facilitate lie detection: The benefit of recalling an event in reverse order. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 253–265.
299.
VrijA.MannS.KristenS.FisherR. (2007). Cues to deception and ability to detect lies as a function of police interview styles. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 499–518.
300.
VrijA.MannS.LealS.FisherR. (2010). “Look into my eyes”: Can an instruction to maintain eye contact facilitate lie detection?Psychology, Crime & Law, 16, 327–348.
301.
VrijA.MannS.LealS.GranhagP.A. (2010). Getting into the minds of pairs of liars and truth tellers: An examination of their strategies [Special issue]. The Open Criminology Journal, 3, 17–22.
302.
VrijA.SeminG.R. (1996). Lie experts' beliefs about nonverbal indicators of deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 20, 65–80.
303.
VrijA.WinkelF.W. (1991). Cultural patterns in Dutch and Surinam nonverbal behavior: An analysis of simulated police/citizen encounters. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 15, 169–184.
304.
VrijA.WinkelF.W. (1992). Crosscultural police–citizen interactions: The influence of race, beliefs and nonverbal communication on impression formation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1546–1559.
305.
VrijA.WinkelF.W. (1994). Perceptual distortions in cross-cultural interrogations: The impact of skin color, accent, speech style and spoken fluency on impression formation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25, 284–296.
306.
VrijA.WinkelF.W.KoppelaarL. (1991). Interactie tussen politiefunctionarissen en allochtone burgers: twee studies naar de frequentie en het effect van aan- en wegkijken op de impressieformatie [Cross-cultural police–citizen interactions: Two experiments examining the impact of gaze behavior on impression formation]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 46, 8–20.
307.
WaenkeM.BlessH. (2000). The effects of subjective ease of retrieval on attitudinal judgements: The moderating role of processing motivation. In BlessH.ForgasJ.P. (Eds.), The message within: The role of subjective experience in social cognition and behaviour (pp. 143–161). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
308.
WalczykJ.J.RoperK.S.SeemannE.HumphreyA.M. (2003). Cognitive mechanisms underlying lying to questions: Response time as a cue to deception. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 755–774.
309.
WalczykJ.J.SchwartzJ.P.CliftonR.AdamsB.WeiM.ZhaP. (2005). Lying person-to-person about live events: A cognitive framework for lie detection. Personnel Psychology, 58, 141–170.
310.
WangG.ChenH.AtabakhshH. (2004). Criminal identity deception and deception detection in law enforcement. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13, 111–127.
311.
WatanabeH. (2005). Semantic and episodic predictions of memory for plans. Japanese Psychological Research, 47, 40–45.
312.
WesselE.DrevlandG.EilertsenD.E.MagnussenS. (2006). Credibility of the emotional witness: A comparison of ratings by laypersons and court judges. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 221–230.
313.
WhiteC.H.BurgoonJ.K. (2001). Adaptation and communicative design: Patterns of interaction in truthful and deceptive conversations. Human Communication Research, 27, 9–37.
314.
WillisJ.TodorovA. (2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17, 592–598.
315.
WinkelF.W.KoppelaarL. (1991). Rape victims' style of self-presentation and secondary victimization by the environment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 6, 29–40.
316.
WinkelF.W.VrijA. (1990). Interaction and impression formation in a cross-cultural dyad: Frequency and meaning of culturally determined gaze behaviour in a police interview setting. Social Behaviour, 5, 335–350.
317.
WolpeP.R.FosterK.R.LanglebenD.D. (2005). Emerging neurotechnologies for lie-detection: Promises and perils. The American Journal of Bioethics, 5, 39–49.
318.
YuilleJ.C. (1988). The systematic assessment of children’s testimony. Canadian Psychology, 29, 247–262.
319.
ZuckermanM.DePauloB.M.RosenthalR. (1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 1–57). New York: Academic Press.
320.
ZuckermanM.DriverR.KoestnerR. (1982). Discrepancy as a cue to actual and perceived deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 7, 95–100.
321.
ZuckermanM.SpeigelN.H.DePauloB.M.RosenthalR. (1982). Nonverbal strategies for decoding deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 6, 171–187.