Assessment of the influence of stitching on the tensile stress relaxation of laminated fabrics

Abstract

Different parts of the garment may be laminated with an interlining in order to obtain specific appearance and form. Mechanical properties of the laminated fabric is affected by the properties of interlining and differs from the face fabric. Moreover, the existence of seam for joining the laminated fabrics in various parts of the garment is another issue, which has to be considered during the evaluation of the mechanical behavior of garment. Garments’ time dependent mechanical behavior such as the tensile stress relaxation is of great importance while wearing them. In this study, the tensile properties and the stress relaxation of a group of woven fabric, which was laminated by a nylon interlining, were investigated at two strain levels, before and after stitching. In this regard, the effects of strain level, lamination process, seam type and the stitch length were evaluated. According to the results, it can be declared that increasing the strain level reduces the stress relaxation percentage. The laminated fabric presented higher values of tensile stress and strain, while lower stress relaxation was occurred in this structure compared to the un-laminated fabric. Analysis of results showed that higher stress relaxation was obtained for the “stitched laminated fabric” compared to the “laminated fabric without seam.” Overall, in the presence of seam, the stress relaxation is affected by the seam type and the stitch length. Finally, the best correlation between the experimental stress relaxation results and the viscoelastic models were obtained for the two-component Maxwell model. The result of this study should be considered in designing and manufacturing of protective textiles and clothing that include both lamination and stitching processes and during use may be encountered with constant strains for a period of time.

Keywords

Stress relaxation laminated fabric seam type strain level sewing thread

Introduction

While wearing garments and during the daily physical activities, various parts of the garment such as the fabric and seams are subjected to different levels of tensile strains. In some parts of the garments, interlinings are laminated to the fabric in order to improve the appearance and stability of the garment. Therefore, evaluation of the mechanical properties of the “laminated fabric” and the “stitched laminated fabric” is important. In some previous research works, the mechanical behavior of seams and also laminated fabrics have been investigated.

Shimazaki and Lloyd (1990) assessed the opening behavior of lockstitch seams subjected to the tensile cyclic loads and offered a predicting model for the explanation of the effects of sewing thread properties, the amount of applied load and the number of loading cycles.¹ Yildirim (2010) developed a mathematical model to calculate seam slippage in seat fabrics during constant loading and also seam fatigue test. They concluded that fabric density, yarn count of constituent yarns and stitch density are dominant reasons of seam slippage.² Sülar et al. (2015) investigated the influence of weave structure and density, linear density of warp and weft yarns, sewing thread type and count on the seam performance and appearance of cotton and polyester fabrics in terms of seam strength, seam efficiency, seam pucker and seam slippage. Obtained results revealed that the influence of sewing thread type on the seam efficiency of cotton fabric is not significant. In addition, polyester fabrics sewn with core-spun sewing thread presented worse seam puckering than mercerized cotton sewing thread.³

Kim et al. (2011) examined the influence of fusing process and application of adhesive interlining on the flexural rigidity of the face fabric considering laminated theory. Their studies illustrated that considering mechanical characteristics of both fused face fabric and interlining is an effective way to predict bending behavior of laminated fabric with better accuracy.⁴ Farzandi et al. (2013) analyzed the physical and mechanical properties of wind stoppers after fusing procedure. In this study, it was presented that the fusing process would improve the flexural rigidity, crease recovery, drape and rises air permeability and water vapor permeability of the fused wind stoppers.⁵ Zhang and Kan (2018) reviewed the usage of fusible interlinings in clothing industry from various aspects of classification, manufacture, characteristic, function, fusing technology and application.⁶ Sudhakar and Rengini (2020) in a review paper concentrated on the factors affecting the properties of fused fabric composites and provided a guidance for the choice of interlinings for a particular hand feel and performance.⁷

When a garment is subjected to a definite extent of strain, as much as the strain remains constant, by the passage of time, the resultant stress considering the mentioned strain diminishes. This phenomenon is one of the important time-dependent mechanical property of the fabric, which is called the stress relaxation occurrence. Therefore, many previous research works have focused on the tensile and stress relaxation properties of fabrics as the constituent element of the garment.

Milasiene et al. (2003) evaluated the viscoelastic behavior of micro porous polyurethane film laminated leather and utilized the linear viscoelastic model such as generalized Maxwell model in order to predict their stress relaxation. Based on the results, it was declared that the viscoelastic nature of polyurethane film dominates on the long-term characteristics of the laminated leather layers.⁸ Milašius et al. (2003) examined stress relaxation of breathable three-ply coated fabric in warp, weft and bias (45°) directions. Based on the outcomes, stress relaxation of coated samples in all studied directions is lower than the face layer.⁹ In another research, Sajn et al. (2006) used various mechanical models such as the Maxwell’s model, Alfrey’s model and the three-component Maxwell’s model with nonlinear spring in order to predict the 1-h and the 24-h relaxation curves of fabrics with increased elasticity. The best explanation was achieved by means of models with higher components.¹⁰ Urbelis et al. (2007) inspected stress relaxation behavior of woven and knitted fabrics that were joined to two warp knitted interlinings through fusing process under different strain levels. Their outcomes reveal that fusing procedure changed the fabric’s stress relaxation performance considerably. Stress relaxation trend of fused fabrics is similar to its constituent’s elements; however, its value depends on the physical and mechanical characteristics of fabric and interlining.¹¹ In a research by Urbelis and Petrauskas (2008) the stress relaxation of clothing fabrics subjected to the hygrothermal treatment and the fusing process was evaluated. In this work, it was declared that during the uniaxial extension, the stress values and the relaxation performance of fabrics and fused systems was influenced by the steaming cycle and the level of specimens’ deformability.¹² Gersak et al. (2011) investigated the stress relaxation performance of wound fabrics consisted of elastane yarns under constant strain, and they found that stress relaxation behavior of wound fabrics could be described considering Maxwell’s model and the modified standard linear solid model.¹³ Hezavehi et al. (2013) examined the influence of extension rate on stress relaxation performance of cylindrical shell woven fabrics and studied the correlation of experimental outcomes with the viscoelastic models. The best agreement was obtained for the three-component Maxwell’s model.¹⁴ Qureshi and Temesgen (2014) studied the stress relaxation phenomenon in nonwoven fabrics, they discovered that gsm of nonwoven structure, bonding method of fibers, and the constituent fibers have an influential effect on the stress relaxation performance.¹⁵ Milašius and Laureckiene (2014) probed stress relaxation of woven fabrics consisted of multifilament polyester yarns during long time and they observed that rate of relaxation in terms of logarithm of time can be illustrated by two straight lines.¹⁶ Hashemi et al. (2016) probed the stress relaxation behavior in two bar warp knitted fabrics considering strain value and fabric direction. Their outcomes reveal that not only fabric structure, but also strain level and fabric direction determine the stress relaxation performance of fabric.¹⁷ Liu and Zhou (2019), focused on the inverse stress relaxation occurs during repeated wear in compression garments used in sportswear in order to offer a guidance for elevating the sportswear performance with regards to fabric engineering and stitch design.¹⁸ Younesi and Ezazshahabi (2020) inspected tensile and stress relaxation of woven fabrics with various weave patterns in different directions. Their observations state that stress relaxation behavior of fabrics depends on the fabric direction, weave structure and also exerted strain level and its variation in terms of fabric direction follows a Gaussian function.¹⁹ Mirjalili Bandari et al. (2020) assessed the impact of strain level on the tensile stress relaxation of rib weft knitted fabrics. In this research it was concluded that application of greater tensile strain would result in a growth in the stress relaxation of the fabrics.²⁰ Mirakhorli and Asayesh (2021) evaluated the tensile stress relaxation of rib weft-knitted fabrics consisting of different knitting patterns, in various directions. According to the results it was shown that the fabric structure considerably influenced the stress relaxation of them in both coarse and wale directions.²¹ Asayesh and Yousefi (2020) investigated the tensile stress relaxation phenomenon in net warp knitted fabric with various structures. According to the outcomes of this study, pin hole-net and quasi-marqussite structures in comparison with tricot, sandfly and quasi-sand fly presented the highest and lowest stress relaxation, respectively.²² Ruznan et al. (2020) assessed stress relaxation of two commercial bandage fabrics that were exposure to 20% extension during 24 h and over 5 days. Their results recommended that rewrapping the bandage after 12 h could be beneficial to keep the exerted pressure on the body in a reasonable range due to the stress relaxation of fabric.²³ Stolyarov and Mostovykh (2020) developed a viscoelastic model consist of elastic, viscous, friction element and also element with complex properties to estimate behavior of polyester woven fabric from various aspects. Their outcomes reveal that recommended model can predict time dependent performance of fabric with reasonable precise.²⁴

Reviewing former research works presented that although many researchers probed the stress relaxation of fabric with various structures, the influence of the application of interlining and lamination (that is applied to improve the fabric appearance and performance) were considered in very limited studies. In the previous studies, stress relaxation behaviour of textile materials with various forms including fibers, yarn and fabric with different structure such as knitted and woven have been considered. Since in the garments, protective textiles and clothing, and other industrial textiles, assemblies of these structures such as stitched fabric and laminated fabrics are utilized, and due to the constantly confronting of these assemblies with the various strain levels during application, detailed assessment of the stress relaxation of these assemblies is necessary. In addition, usually lamination of fabric in a garment is followed by stitching procedure that can affect the time dependent behavior of the laminated fabric, which was not considered in previous researches. In this regard, the aim of this study is to examine the tensile and stress relaxation of fabrics before and after lamination with an interlining. Then, the impact of stitching on the variation of stress relaxation of laminated fabric is considered. To this end, two common seam types that are utilized in joining fabrics including superimposed seam and lapped seam are considered for sample preparation. Since lockstitch is the most stitch type for assembling fabrics to each other in a garment, it is applied for stitching. Moreover, the effect of stitch length and seam type are examined on the stress relaxation of laminated fabric after stitching.

Experimental

Materials

In order to study the tensile and stress relaxation behavior of laminated fabric with adhesive interlining before and after stitching, a worsted fabric comprised of 10% polyester and 90% wool fibers was applied as the face fabric. In addition, a woven adhesive interlining was used to join to the face fabric through fusing process. On the purpose of examining the influence of stitching on the tensile and stress relaxation of face fabric after lamination, a commercial sewing thread was selected to prepare the seamed specimens. The characteristics of the mentioned materials are presented in the Table 1.

Table 1.

Characteristics of fabric, interlining and sewing thread.

Fabric characteristics
Fabric weight (g/m²)	Weave pattern	Warp density (cm⁻¹)	Weft density (cm⁻¹)	Thickness (mm)
225	Herringbone twill 2/1	35	17	0.37
Interlining characteristics
Fabric weight (g/m²)	Weave pattern	Warp density (cm⁻¹)	Weft density (cm⁻¹)	Thickness (mm)
75	Plain	17	17	0.28
Sewing thread characteristics
Yarn code	Fibre composition	Yarn type	Count (tex)	Twist (tpm)
PES/core	Polyester	Core spun	63	575

Sample preparation

In order to probe the tensile and stress relaxation of laminated fabric, Gygli (PR8M) continuous fusing machine was utilized for joining the face fabric and interlining through fusing process. Both face fabric and interlining were cut in the warp direction with the dimension of $35 \times 5 c m^{2}$ . The lamination process was performed in the temperature of 120°C, under pressure of 2 bar for duration of 12 s.

As sewing process, due to the lack of integration of fused fabric can change the tensile and stress relaxation behavior of laminated fabrics, it is necessary to investigate the tensile properties and stress relaxation of laminated fabrics both with seam and without seam.

To this end, two strips of laminated fabrics with the dimension of $35 \times 5 c m^{2}$ were sewn by a lockstitch Adler sewing machine Model 271. In order to prepare test specimens, three stitch lengths including 2, 3 and 4 mm and a constant seam allowance of 8 mm were used. Furthermore, in order to inspect the effect of geometry of fabric layers placement on each other in the seam line, two main seams which are applied for joining fabrics including the superimposed seam (SS) and lapped seam (LS) were considered for sample preparation. The configuration of the stated seams is presented in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Configuration of the lapped and superimposed seam (a) superimposed seam; (b) lapped seam.

It should be noted that laminated fabric strips were sewn along the shorter edge (weft direction); consequently, the force is applied perpendicular to the seam line.

Testing procedure

Tensile characteristics

In order to examine the tensile behavior of the face fabric, interlining, and the laminated fabrics in both conditions of with seam and without seam, the BS EN ISO 13934-1:1999 standard test method was utilized and the tests were performed by the Instron 5566 tensile testing machine. According to the mentioned test method, the gauge length was set to 20 cm and test procedure was performed with the rate of 100 mm/min. Moreover, a pre-tension of 10 g was applied to all samples. For each specimen, five samples were tested and the tests were continued until complete failure of samples. The average values of various tensile parameters were reported.

Stress relaxation behavior

During the physical activities of the wearer and various body positioning, the entire garment including the fabric, laminated sections and the seam lines tolerate different levels of tensile loads for a period of time. Subsequently, besides the tensile performance of mentioned parts, their mechanical manner during the passage of time, such as stress relaxation should be considered. The stress relaxation behavior of the face fabric and the laminated components “while having seam” and “without seam,” were evaluated at two-strain levels (below the breaking strain) which were defined based on the results of their tensile behavior. The two mentioned strain levels were consisted of strain “before the yield point” and “between the yield and rupture point,” in order to investigate the stress relaxation performance of the mentioned components, in both linear and non-linear deformation zones, respectively. It should be considered that the stress relaxation tests for the laminated samples before and after stitching were carried out using Instron 5566 tensile testing machine.

The stress relaxation percentage of samples was calculated by equation (1):

Stress Relaxation (%) = \frac{σ_{\max} - σ_{\min}}{σ_{\max}} \times 100

(1)

where:

$σ_{\max}$ : The maximum applied stress

$σ_{\min}$ : The minimum applied stress (measured after the passage of 900 s)

For assessing the stress relaxation performance of the mentioned structures (fabric, interlining and laminated fabric in both conditions of with seam and without seam), five samples with the dimensions of 20 cm × 5 cm were tested. The stress relaxation tests were performed at two strain levels including the maximum elastic strain (before yield point) and 65% of the breaking strain. The initial length of the sample was 7.5 cm and the extension rate was 20 mm/min. The variation of the fabric’s stress was observed and analyzed for a period of 900 s. The setup of tensile testing machine for both stress relaxation and tensile strength of samples are presented in Figure 2. As it is mentioned in the Figure 2, the gauge length of stress relaxation and tensile behavior tests are different.

Figure 2.

Device setup for tensile behavior and stress relaxation tests.

The precise amounts of the exerted strain for each structure are shown in Table 2. It should be noted that in case of stitched laminated fabric, only the strain level of 7% (elastic zone) was applied. The various stages of testing materials are summarized in Figure 3.

Table 2.

Strain levels for stress relaxation experiment of all tested structures.

Sample code	Strain before yield point (%)	Strain after yield point (%)
Fabric	8	10
Interlining	8	24
Laminated fabric	7	8
Stitched laminated fabric-SS-PES/core	7
Stitched laminated fabric-LS-PES/core	7

Figure 3.

Testing process for various materials and assemblies.

Results and discussion

Tensile behavior

Prior to the evaluation of the tensile stress relaxation behavior of the stitched laminated fabric, it was necessary to investigate the tensile characteristics of the constituent elements of it including the face fabric and interlining, separately. Besides, the tensile performance of laminated fabric were measured before and after sewing. Basically, the mentioned experiments were carried out in order to define the strain levels in both elastic and non-linear deformation zones, which are required to be applied in the stress relaxation tests (Table 2).

As it was mentioned before, the face fabric used in this study was a worsted woven fabric, which was fused with a nylon woven interlining. The tensile characteristics of the face fabric, interlining and the laminated fabric, are gathered in Table 3, in terms of breaking stress, breaking strain and the initial modulus.

Table 3.

Tensile properties of the face fabric, interlining and laminated fabric.

Sample	Breaking stress (N/mm)	Breaking strain (%)	Initial modulus (N/mm)
Sample	Mean	Mean	Mean
Face fabric	12.3 ± 0.74	18.5 ± 1.65	82.5 ± 3.92
Interlining	10.4 ± 0.85	20 ± 1.04	28.89 ± 2.98
Laminated fabric	12.43 ± 1.52	13 ± 2.32	84.05 ± 1.81

According to the results shown in Table 3, it was observed that the tensile breaking stress and the initial modulus of the face fabric was higher than the interlining, while the breaking strain of the interlining is much higher than the face fabric. The mentioned results can be interpreted based on the characteristics of them, which were reported in Table 1. The lower areal weight, warp and weft density and thickness of the interlining fabric is the reason for the obtained result. Moreover, the outcomes of the tensile tests showed that the strength and the initial modulus of the laminated fabric is slightly higher than the face fabric. The most considerable effect of lamination was on the breaking strain. The process of laminating a woven fabric with a layer of interlining would increase the firmness of the laminated structure, thus its resistance to deformation would rise and consequently higher value of modulus and lower amount of breaking strain were obtained.

As it was mentioned before, in this study, the laminated fabrics were sewn using lockstitch with an identical type of polyester “core-spun” sewing thread and three stitch lengths of 2, 2 and 4 mm. It should be noted that two main seams including the superimposed seam (SS) and lapped seam (LS) were also used and the effect of seam type on the tensile behavior of stitched laminated fabric was analyzed, as well. The results of the tensile properties of the laminated seamed fabrics are shown in Table 4.

Table 4.

Tensile properties of laminated seamed fabric.

Seam type	Superimposed seam			Lapped seam
Stitch length (mm)	2	3	4	2	3	4
Stitch length (mm)	Mean	Mean	Mean	Mean	Mean	Mean
Breaking stress (N/mm)	14.63 ± 0.57	12.71 ± 0.88	10.05 ± 0.78	16.89 ± 0.77	14.02 ± 0.65	12.79 ± 1.09
Breaking strain (%)	15 ± 1.05	13 ± 0.97	12 ± 1.20	13 ± 0.94	12 ± 0.78	11 ± 1.14

Considering the data gathered in Table 4, it can be declared that the breaking stress and breaking strain of the stitched laminated fabric were influenced by the seam type and also the stitch length. The breaking stress of the lapped seam was higher than the superimposed seam, since in lapped seam structure, both fabric’s edges are positioned in reverse directions. Therefore, the interlock points of the threads sewn with both fabric layers withstand the applied tensile force. In case of utilizing superimposed seam, fabrics edges are placed on the same directions, so during the extension of the superimposed seam, the exerted load is tolerated by the sewing thread in the seam line and fabric layers have no significant role in the confrontation against the tensile load, so the seam strength is reduced in this structure. Based on the mentioned elaboration on the effect of seam type on the tensile properties, it was also observed that the tensile breaking strain in the lapped seam structure is slightly lower than the superimposed seam, due to its higher resistance against deformation.

Moreover, the results gathered in Table 4, revealed that an increase in the stitch length, which in fact decreases the stitch density, would lead to a slight diminish in the value of tensile breaking stress and strain. The achieved outcome is related to the lower entanglement between the sewing thread and the laminated fabric.

Statistical analysis of results showed that the effect of seam type and the stitch length on the seam strength is significant at the confidence level of 95%.

Stress relaxation behavior

As it is known, stress relaxation can be defined as the reduction of induced stress in fabric or other textile structure, which is exposed to a specified level of strain, during the passage of time. As it was mentioned previously, in this study, stress relaxation behavior of face fabric, interlining, laminated fabric before and after sewing are investigated in both elastic and non-elastic deformation zones.

Face fabric and interlining

Stress relaxation of both face fabric and interlining were evaluated under two strain levels including before yield point and 65% of breaking strain during 900 s to examine stress relaxation of fabric and interlining in the elastic and non-elastic region. The variation of stress in terms of time for both face fabric and interlining are illustrated in Figure 4. According to this figure, a quick stress drop is clear at the first 30 s of the test. Then, stress reduction is followed with a low rate (nearly between the 30–250 s) and finally it leads to an approximately constant stress value.

Figure 4.

Stress relaxation behavior of face fabric and interlining at two strain levels (a) face fabric; (b) interlining.

Based on Figure 4, it is observed that the rise of the strain level in both samples leads to the increase of stress value due to the higher strain and deformation made in the samples. The stress relaxation in face fabric and interlining in both strain levels were computed according to the equation (1). Obtained outcomes revealed that the stress relaxation of the face fabric and interlining at the maximum elastic strain were 24.7% and 26.4%, respectively. However, the value of stress relaxation of the former and the latter at 65% of breaking strain were correspondingly 25.46% and 26.54%. It seems that interlining has more tendency to get free of stress in comparison with the face fabric due to its lower warp density and higher extensibility. Therefore, the effect of strain level on the stress relaxation of interlining is not meaningful. On the other hand, increase of strain level results in more stress relaxation in the face fabric owing to the higher deformation developed in the fabric.

According to the statistical analysis of results, the difference of stress relaxation of face fabric and interlining at the confidence level of 95% is significant.

Laminated fabric

In order to investigate the impact of lamination on the stress relaxation of fabric, the face fabric was laminated by a woven interlining in fusing process. Stress relaxation behavior of laminated fabric was evaluated at two strain levels namely the maximum elastic strain and 65% of breaking strain. In Figure 5 the stress variation of laminated fabric at two strain levels are illustrated in terms of time.

Figure 5.

Stress relaxation behavior of laminated fabric at two strain levels.

According to the Figure 5, it can be noted that the same trend is achieved for the laminated fabric. In other words, the increasing of exerted strain on the specimen would lead to the higher stress in the sample. However, decrease of stress occurs during time with various rate, at first seconds it reduces rapidly and after that, it follows a moderate rate until remains almost constant.

Calculation of stress relaxation after lamination at two applied strains demonstrate that stress relaxation before and after yield point were 23.16% and 23.53%, respectively. It can be perceived that stress relaxation of face fabric and interlining decreases after lamination. However, the influence of strain level on the stress relaxation of laminated fabric is negligible. In fact, during fusing process that is utilized to join the interlining to the face fabric, due to the heating of the thermoplastic resin, the resin is converted to viscose material and performs as an adhesive. Because of application of pressure on the fabric and interlining during fusing process, the viscose resin penetrates into the fabric and in the ideal situation it is equally distributed between the fabric and interlining in the joining line. After the fusing procedure, the whole assembly cools down and thermoplastic resin again turns out to be rigid material. It should be considered that due to the penetration of resin into the fabric structure, the laminated fabric usually has more bending rigidity than face fabric. Consequently, the ability of laminated fabric to release the applied strain diminishes and it presents lower stress relaxation.

Stitched laminated fabric

On the aim of examination, the influence of sewing process and its related parameters such as stitch length and seam type on the stress relaxation of laminated fabric, stress relaxation of stitched laminated fabric after application of elastic strain was probed. In Figure 6 the stress variation of seamed samples during time is presented.

Figure 6.

Stress relaxation seamed laminated fabric at elastic strain (a) superimposed seam; (b) lapped seam.

As it is presented in Figure 6, it can be observed that stress relaxation of laminated fabric after sewing have the same propensity as previous samples in terms of stress reduction rate during time. The other point that should be noticed is the effect of stitch length on the developed stress in the sample. In other words, the longer stitch length leads to the lower developed stress in the sample. Decrease of stitch length results in higher number of interlocking points between sewing thread and fabric; hence, the exerted tension is distributed between more interlock points and to achieve a certain strain level, higher tension is developed in the sample. In addition, comparison of stress in superimposed seam and lapped seam reveals that higher stress is induced in the latter and this outcome is related to the seam structure and orientation of fabric layers in the seam type. The stress relaxation of various seamed samples are summarized in Table 5.

Table 5.

Stress relaxation of laminated fabric after sewing.

Seam type	Superimposed seam			Lapped seam
Stitch length (mm)	2	3	4	2	3	4
Stress relaxation (%)	Mean	Mean	Mean	Mean	Mean	Mean
Stress relaxation (%)	27.08 ± 0.54	25.69 ± 1.02	25.31 ± 0.25	26.56 ± 1.59	24.54 ± 0.49	23.94 ± 2.39

In order to analyze the influence of stitch length and seam type on the stress relaxation, in Figure 7 stress relaxation of laminated fabric after sewing with various parameters are compared.

Figure 7.

The effect of stitch length and seam type on the stress relaxation.

As it is clear in Figure 7, the highest and lowest stress relaxation belong to the sample sewn with stitch length of 2 mm and 4 mm, respectively. As it was mentioned previously, in the samples prepared with stitch length of 2 mm, higher elastic stress is developed in the sample that results in an instability. Consequently, the sample has more tendency to recover to the free-state condition. Besides, sample with superimposed seam have more propensity to release the stress comparing with lapped seam. This result is due to difference of seam structure. In lapped seam, free edges of fabric layers are placed in opposite direction, however; in the superimposed seam free edges are located in the same direction. During stress relaxation test, when strain is exerted perpendicular to the seam line, in superimposed seam the stress is exerted on the sewing thread in the seam line. On the other hand, in the lapped seam the stress is applied on the seam line, which include two fabric layers jointed to each other by sewing thread. In fact, fabric layers interlocked by sewing thread tolerate the applied strain. Hence, in superimposed seam, the seam line has more movability to return to the free of stress condition.

Statistical analysis of results reveal that the influence of stitch length and seam type on the stress relaxation of laminated fabric is significant at the confidence level of 95%.

The effect of sewing and lamination on the stress relaxation

To explore the impact of various processes that are performed during clothing manufacturing on the stress relaxation of fabric, in Figure 8 stress relaxation of face fabric before and after lamination and sewing are compared. It can be observed that before fusing process, the stress relaxation of interlining is higher than face fabric. This result is related to the lower warp density and higher extensibility of the tested interlining. However, it should be considered that stress relaxation of various interlinings can be different and it depends on the structural characteristics of interlining.

Figure 8.

The influence of various process and the stress relaxation of fabric.

After the fusing process, stress relaxation of laminated fabric reduced considerably compared to the face fabric and interlining due to the penetration of heated viscose resin into the fabric under the pressure that lead to the joining face fabric and interlining. Then in the cooling stage, the resin again turns to the dry and rigid state that reduce flexibility and movability of yarn in the fabric, consequently; least stress relaxation is obtained in laminated fabric. However, assembling two strips of laminated fabrics by sewing enhances stress relaxation. In other words, when tensile strain is exerted on a seamed laminated fabric, developed tensile stress is applied on the weakest point of the assembly, which is the seam line due to the lack of integration. Hence, each interlocking point of fabric and sewing thread tolerate the stress and has higher movability to release the stress. As it was explained previously, by increasing the stitch length, because of the lower induced stress in the seam line results in less stress relaxation. In addition, superimposed seam type presents higher stress relaxation due to the placement of fabrics and sewing thread in the superimposed seam that increase ability of the sewing thread to move and recover to the free of stress state rather than lapped seam.

Stress relaxation correlation with viscoelastic models

Textile materials during deformation exhibit both viscous and elastic characteristics, therefore; they are named viscoelastic materials. In other words, their behavior during loading includes both immediate and time dependent responses as a result of elastic and viscous property. In order to investigate time-dependent behavior of viscoelastic materials, viscoelastic models that combined of spring and dashpot are used. Spring and dashpot are used to present elastic and viscous property of material. Various viscoelastic models with different combinations of spring and dashpot are developed to explain viscoelastic characteristics of material. “Maxwell’s model” is the simplest model; however, application of more elements leads to models that present better adaptation with experimental and real condition.

Sajn et al. (2006)¹⁰ presented various mechanical models for the estimation of the viscoelastic performance of textile materials. In this study three-viscoelastic models including the “Maxwell’s model,” “two-component Maxwell’s model” and the “modified model of standard linear solid” was utilized in order to analyze the correlation between the experimental stress relaxation results obtained for the stitched laminated fabric and also the laminated fabric without seam. The mentioned models are observable in Figure 9.

Figure 9.

Viscoelastic models for analysis of stress relaxation (a) Maxwell’s model; (b) two-component Maxwell’s model; (c) modified model of standard linear solid.

The related equations to each of the models shown in Figure 9 are as below:

\begin{array}{l} Maxwell's model σ (t) = σ (t_{0}) e^{- \frac{(t - t_{0})}{τ}} \\ (t_{0} \leq t) \end{array}

(2)

\begin{array}{l} Two-component Maxwell's model σ (t) = σ_{1} (t_{0}) e^{- \frac{(t - t_{0})}{τ_{1}}} + σ_{2} (t_{0}) e^{- \frac{(t - t_{0})}{τ_{2}}} \\ (t_{0} \leq t) \end{array}

(3)

\begin{array}{l} Modified model of standard linear solid σ (t) = b ε {(t_{0})}^{2} + e^{- \frac{(t - t_{0})}{τ}} (σ (t_{0}) - b ε {(t_{0})}^{2}) \\ (t_{0} \leq t) \end{array}

(4)

In the mentioned models (equation (2), (3) and (4)), μ is the coefficient of viscosity and E is the elastic modulus. The stress and time are noted as σ and t, respectively. In addition, τ is the relation between the coefficient of viscosity (μ) and the elastic modulus E, in the form of $τ = μ / E$ . Besides, in equation (4) which is presented for the modified model of standard linear solid, a nonlinear spring is used parallel to the Maxwell’s component, for better representation of the nonlinear relation between stress and deformation of the viscoelastic material. In equation (4), ε_nl is the deformation, σ_nl is the stress and b is the constant of the nonlinear spring.

The correction between the mentioned viscoelastic models and the stress relaxation behavior of the “face fabric,” “laminated fabric without seam” and the “stitched laminated fabric” is shown in Figure 10.

Figure 10.

Correlation between the experimental stress relaxation results and viscoelastic models (a) face fabric; (b) laminated fabric; (c) stitched laminated fabric.

As it is shown in Figure 10, by the comparison of the R-squared values obtained for the viscoelastic models which were analyzed in this study for the evaluation of the stress relaxation process of “face fabric,” “laminated fabric” and the “stitched laminated fabric,” it is clear that the best correlation was attained for the “two-component Maxwell’s model.” The values of the R-squared value for the “face fabric,” “laminated fabric,” and “stitched laminated fabric” were 0.9746, 0.9698 and 0.9689, respectively. Among the investigated models the “Maxwell’s model” showed the worst correlation because of its fewer elements and its simple structure, which reduced the model’s capability to correlate the experimental results.

In view of the previous works such as references¹⁷ and^19–21 it was observed that the two-component Maxwell model and the modified model of standard linear solid was used with an acceptable correlation for validation of the experimental results. In this research, it is more desired to utilize models with lower components but satisfactory compatibility. Therefore, the two-component Maxwell model was selected for the confirmation of the stress relaxation experimental results.

Conclusion

Since during body movement, various parts of the garment including fabric, laminated fabric and seamed fabrics are exposed to tensile strain, investigation of tensile behavior and stress relaxation of mentioned elements are necessary. In this regard, a worsted fabric and a woven interlining were utilized to make laminated samples. Furthermore, laminated strips were assembled by superimposed seam and lapped seam type and a commercial sewing thread with three different stitch lengths. Tensile strength and stress relaxation of various elements were measured. The obtained outcomes reveal that:

• The breaking strain of laminated structure is lower than face fabric.

• The seam type and stitch density affect the breaking stress of stitched laminated fabric.

• The breaking stress of lapped seam is higher than superimposed seam. This result is related to the seam structure and the orientation of layers in the seam zone.

• In both seam types, increase of stitch length leads to the lower breaking stress and strain due to the lower entanglement between the sewing thread and laminated fabric.

• The interlining is more prone to release the induced stress due to its lower warp density and higher extensibility.

• Stress relaxation of fabric and interlining decrease after lamination.

• Samples stitched with smaller stitch length present higher stress relaxation.

• In the similar condition, superimposed seam have higher stress relaxation than lapped seam.

• The lamination process would decrease the stress relaxation of fabric. On the other hand, stitching of the laminated fabrics would lead to the increase of the stress relaxation percentage.

• The experimental results of the stress relaxation behavior of the fabric, laminated fabric and the stitched laminated fabric with various stitch length were correlated by the two-component Maxwell’s model in an acceptable manner.

The result of this study should be considered in designing and manufacturing of protective textiles and clothing that include both lamination and stitching processes and during use may be encountered with constant strains for a period of time.

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iDs

Nazanin Ezazshahabi

Fatemeh Mousazadegan

References

Shimazaki

Lloyd

. Opening behavior of lockstitch seams in woven fabrics under cyclic loading. Text Res J 1990; 60: 654–662.

Yildirim

. Predicting seam opening behavior of woven seat fabrics. Text Res J 2010; 80: 472–480.

Sülar

Meşegül

Kefsiz

, et al. A comparative study on seam performance of cotton and polyester woven fabrics. J Text Inst 2015; 106: 19–30.

Kim

Inui

Takatera

. Verification of prediction for bending rigidity of woven fabric laminated with interlining by adhesive bonding. Text Res J 2011; 81: 598–607.

Farzandi

Razipour

Mousazadegan

, et al. Effects of using interlinings on physical and mechanical properties of wind stoppers. Int J Cloth Sci Technol 2013; 25: 99–108.

Zhang

Kan

. A review of fusible interlinings usage in garment manufacture. Polymers 2018; 10: 1230–1262.

Sudhakar

Rengini

. Evaluation and prediction of fused fabric composites properties––a review. J Ind Text 2020; 2020: 152808372091985.

Milasiene

Jankauskaite

Aicisauskaite

. prediction of stress relaxation in laminated leather layers. Mater Sci 2003; 9: 73–79.

Milašius

Milašiene

Jankauskaite

. Investigation of stress relaxation of breathable coated fabric for clothing and footwear. Fibres Text East Eur 2003; 11: 52–54.

10.

Sajn

Gersak

Flajs

. Prediction of stress relaxation of fabrics with increased elasticity. Text Res J 2006; 76: 742–750.

11.

Urbelis

Petrauskas

Gulbiniene

. Stress relaxation of clothing fabrics and their systems. Mater Sci 2007; 13: 327–332.

12.

Urbelis

Petrauskas

. Influence of hygrothermal treatment on the stress relaxation of clothing fabrics’ systems. Mater Sci 2008; 14: 69–74.

13.

Gersak

Sajn

Bukosek

. A study of the relaxation phenomena in the fabrics containing elastane yarns. Int J Cloth Sci Technol 2011; 81: 598–607.

14.

Hezavehi

Azadiyan

Zolgharnein

. Investigation and modelling of stress relaxation on cylindrical shell woven fabrics: effect of experimental speed. Fibres Text East Eur 2013; 21: 64–73.

15.

Qureshi

Temesgen

. An experimental analysis of stress relaxation in nonwoven fabrics. RJTA 2014; 18: 38–43.

16.

Milašius

Laureckiene

. Prediction of long-lasting relaxation properties of polyester yarns and fabrics. Fibres Text East Eur 2014; 22: 97–100.

17.

Hashemi

Asayesh

Asgharian Jeddi

, et al. The influence of two bar warp-knitted structure on the fabric tensile stress relaxation. J Text Inst 2016; 107: 512–524.

18.

Liu

Zhou

. Analysis of the dynamic properties of elastic knitted fabric for sportswear: inverse stress relaxation. Text Res J 2019; 89: 1673–1683.

19.

Younesi

Ezazshahabi

. Tensile characteristics and stress relaxation analysis of woven fabrics in terms of fabric direction. J Text Inst 2020; 111: 453–466.

20.

Mirjalili Bandari

Asayesh

Latifi

. The effect of fabric structure and strain percentage on the tensile stress relaxation of rib weft knitted fabrics. Fiber Polym 2020; 21: 921–929.

21.

Mirakhorli

Asayesh

. The influence of fabric structure and loading direction on the tensile stress relaxation of rib weft-knitted fabrics. Mech Time-Depend Mater 2021.

22.

Asayesh

Yousefi

. Effect of fabric structure on the tensile stress relaxation of net warp knitted fabric. J Text Polym 2020; 8: 65–71.

23.

Ruznan

Laing

Lowe

, et al. Understanding stress-strain behavioural change in fabrics for compression bandaging. Int J Low Extrem Wounds 2020; 20(3): 244–250.

24.

Stolyarov

Mostovykh

. Creep and stress relaxation behaviour of woven polyester fabrics: experiment and modeling. Mech Time-Depend Mater 2022.