This article explores the mechanisms that shape how race is represented in online TV interfaces by analyzing Netflix’s personalized cover art, an essential digital paratext designed to attract viewers through individualized images. Netflix has previously been accused of using its personalized cover art or thumbnails in racially biased ways, displaying either Black or white characters based on the presumed race of users. To further existing research on this digital feature, this article focuses not just on whether Black characters are represented, but also on how they are represented. Through an exploratory pilot study that involves the creation of different algorithmic identities with disparate viewing histories, I trace the distinct and divergent representational patterns generated by Netflix’s personalized thumbnails, and point to how aesthetic patterns, such as changes in color palette, composition, and facial expressions, subvert as well as reproduce stereotypical imagery, thereby providing new insights into the racialized dimensions of SVODs.
AhmedSara. 2007. “A Phenomenology of Whiteness.”Feminist Theory8 (2): 149–68.
2.
AmatFernandoChandrashekarAshokJebaraTonyBasilicoJustin. 2018. “Artwork personalization at Netflix.” Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems.
3.
AmatriainXavier. 2013. “Big & personal: data and models behind Netflix recommendations.” Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Big Data, Streams and Heterogeneous Source Mining: Algorithms, Systems, Programming Models and Applications.
4.
ArnoldSarah. 2016. “Netflix and the Myth of Choice/Participation/Autonomy.” In The Netflix Effect: Technology and Entertainment in the 21st Century, edited by McDonaldKSmith-RowseyD. Bloomsbury.
Cheney-LippoldJohn. 2011. “A New Algorithmic Identity: Soft Biopolitics and the Modulation of Control.”Theory Culture & Society28 (6): 164–81.
7.
ChunWendy Hui Kyong. 2013. “Race and/as Technology or How to Do Things to Race.” In Race after the Internet, edited by NakamuraLisaChow-WhitePeter, Routledge.
8.
CollinsPatricia Hill. 2004. Black Sexual Politics: African Americans, Gender, and the New Racism. Routledge.
DeCarvalhoLauren J.Nicole B. Cox. 2016. “Extended “visiting hours” deconstructing identity in Netflix’s promotional campaigns for Orange Is the New Black.”Television & New Media17 (6): 504–19.
11.
DickinsonGregAndersonKarrin Vasby. 2004. “Fallen: OJ Simpson, Hillary Rodham Clinton, and the Re-centering of White Patriarchy.”Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies1 (3): 271–96.
12.
EklundOliver. 2022. “Custom Thumbnails: The Changing Face of Personalisation Strategies on Netflix.”Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies28 (3): 737–60.
13.
GawFatima. 2022. “Algorithmic Logics and the Construction of Cultural Taste of the Netflix Recommender System.”Media Culture & Society44 (4): 706–25.
14.
GillespieTarleton. 2014. “The Relevance of Algorithms.” In Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society, edited by GillespieTarletonBoczkowskiPablo J.FootKirsten A.MIT Press.
15.
GrayJonathan. 2010. Show Sold Separately: Promos, Spoilers, and Other Media Paratexts. New York University Press.
16.
HallinanBlakeStriphasTed. 2016. “Recommended for You: The Netflix Prize and the Production of Algorithmic Culture.”New Media & Society18 (1): 117–37.
McIlwainCharlton. 2017. “Racial Formation, Inequality and the Political Economy of Web Traffic.”Information Communication & Society20 (7): 1073–89.
26.
MeyerendDaniel. 2023. “The Algorithm Knows I’m Black: From Users to Subjects.”Media Culture & Society45 (3): 629–45.
27.
MorrisJeremy Wade. 2015. Selling Digital Music, Formatting Culture. University of California Press.
28.
MurrayNailaMarchesottiLucaPerronninFlorent Florent 2012. “AVA: A large-scale database for aesthetic visual analysis.” 2012 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition.
NobleSafiya Umoja. 2018. Algorithms of Oppression. New York University Press.
31.
PettyMiriam J.2016. Stealing the Show: African American Performers and Audiences in 1930s Hollywood. University of California Press.
32.
Pisarz-RamirezGabriele. 2015. “Racial Ambiguity and Racial Capital: Marketing the Postracial Melting Pot.” In Selling Ethnicity and Race: Consumerism and Representation in TwentyFirst-Century America, edited by Pisarz-RamirezGabrieleUsbeckFrankGrobAnneLippoldMaria. Mosaic Press.
SmitsRoderikNikdelE. W.2019. “Beyond Netflix and Amazon: MUBI and the Curation of on-Demand Film.”Studies in European Cinema16 (1): 22–37.
35.
StanfillMel. 2015. “The Interface as Discourse: The Production of Norms Through Web Design.”New Media & Society17 (7): 1059–74.
36.
SteeleCatherine Knight. 2016. “Pride and Prejudice: Pervasiveness of Colorism and the Animated SeriesProud Family.”Howard Journal of Communications27 (1): 53–67.
37.
SubíasMónica HerreroLaverónMercedes MedinaMolinaAlicia María Urgellés. 2018. “Online Recommendation Systems in the Spanish Audiovisual Market: Comparative Analysis Between Atresmedia, Movistar+ and Netflix.”UCJC Business & Society Review12 (60): 54–89.
38.
ThylstrupNannaStina Teilmann-Lock. 2017. “The Transformative Power of the Thumbnail Image: Media Logistics and Infrastructural Aesthetics.”First Monday22 (10). doi:10.5210/fm.v22i10.7869.
