This paper investigates how users engage with content on TikTok that was originally produced for television. Based on interviews with participants in Costa Rica, we argue that watching television content on TikTok provides valuable insights into the future trajectories of both television and new media. To this end, we first demonstrate that TikTok’s television flow (in Raymond Williams’ sense) is “co-programed” through user interaction with algorithms, rather than being universally predetermined. We then posit the notion of “uncommitted attention” to argue that watching television on TikTok involves active engagement with content and texto-material conditions that make this experience fleeting and unstable. Finally, we examine how users establish cross-platform flows between TikTok and their broader media environments. In this way, we offer insights into how ontologically ambivalent platforms such as TikTok reconfigure traditional television watching.
PeraltaBrenesCarlosIgnacio SilesLarissaTristán Jiménez. 2024. Nuestras Apps de Cada Día: 2do Informe Sobre El Uso de Plataformas Digitales En Costa Rica [Our Daily Apps: 2nd Report on the Use of Digital Platforms in Costa Rica] (2024. San José: CICOM.
3.
BrownMaria-GemmaCarahNicholasRobardsBradyDobsonAmyRangiahLillianDe LazzariChiara. 2024. “No Targets, Just Vibes: Tuned Advertising and the Algorithmic Flow of Social Media.” Social Media + Society10 (1): 1–15.
4.
CarmiElinor. 2020. “Rhythmedia: A Study of Facebook Immune System.” Theory Culture & Society37 (5): 119–38.
5.
ColemanRebecca. 2018. “Theorizing the Present: Digital Media, Pre-emergence and Infra-Structures of Feeling.” Cultural Studies32 (4): 600–22.
6.
ColeSebastian. 2024. “Exploring Users’ Algorithmic Knowledge and Reflexivity in a Music Streaming Context: A Critical Realist Approach.” Convergence30 (6): 2075–15.
7.
CoxChristopher M.2018. “Programming–Flow in the Convergence of Digital Media Platforms and Television.” Critical Studies in Television13 (4): 438–54.
8.
FaltesekDanielGraalumElizbethBrevingBaileyKnudsenElseLuciaLucasJessicaYoungSierraEduardo Varas ZambranoFelix. 2023. “TikTok as Television.” Social Media + Society9 (3): 1–13.
9.
GrayJonathan. 2010. Show Sold Separately: Promos, Spoilers, and Other Media Paratexts. New York: NYU Press.
10.
GrayJonathanLotzAmanda D., eds. 2019. Television Studies. 2nd ed.Cambridge: Polity.
11.
JenkinsHenry. 2006. Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: NYU Press.
KendallTina. 2021. “From Binge-Watching to Binge-Scrolling: TikTok and the Rhythms Of# LockdownLife.” Film Quarterly75: 41–6.
14.
LüdersMarikaSchanke SundetVilde. 2022. “Conceptualizing the Experiential Affordances of Watching Online TV.” Television & New Media23 (4): 335–51.
15.
LupinacciLudmila. 2024. “Phenomenal Algorhythms: The Sensorial Orchestration of ‘Real-Time’ in the Social Media Manifold.” New Media & Society26 (7): 4078–98.
16.
McCarthyAnna. 2001. Ambient Television: Visual Culture and Public Space. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
17.
Muñoz-GonzálezRodrigo. 2025. Young People, Media, and Nostalgia: An Ethnography of How Youth Imagine Their Lives. London: Routledge.
18.
OswaldKathleenPackerJeremy. 2013. “Flow and Mobile Media: Broadcast Fixity to Digital Fluidity.” In Communication Matters: Materialist Approaches to Media, Mobility and Networks, edited by PackerJeremyCrofts WileyStephen B., 276–87. London: Routledge.
19.
SchellewaldAndreas. 2024. “Discussing the Role of TikTok Sharing Practices in Everyday Social Life.” Journal of International Communication18: 909–26.
20.
SilesIgnacio. 2023. Living With Algorithms: Agency and User Culture in Costa Rica. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
SilesIgnacioGómez-CruzEdgarRicaurtePaola. 2024a. “Fluid Agency in Relation to Algorithms: Tensions, Mediations, and Transversalities.” Convergence30 (3): 1025–40.
22.
SilesIgnacioValerio-AlfaroLucianaArriagadaArturo. 2024b. “‘Music is Just Right There on Social Media!’: Discovering, Exploring, and Incorporating Songs Across Platforms.” Journal of International Communication18: 3480–500.
23.
SilesIgnacioValerio-AlfaroLucianaMeléndez-MoranAriana. 2024c. “Learning to Like TikT ok. . . and Not: Algorithm Awareness as Process.” New Media & Society26: 5702–18.
24.
SilesIgnacioBoczkowskiPablo. 2012. “At the Intersection of Content and Materiality: A Texto-Material Perspective on Agency in the Use of Media Technologies.” Communication Theory22 (3): 227–49.
25.
SilesIgnacioMeléndez-MoranAriana. 2021. “‘The Most Aggressive of Algorithms’: User Awareness of and Attachment to TikTok’s Content Personalization.” Paper Presented at the 71st Annual Conference of the International Communication Association. Denver.
26.
SilesIgnacioSegura-CastilloAndrésSolísRicardoSanchoMónica. 2020. “Folk Theories of Algorithmic Recommendations on Spotify: Enacting Data Assemblages in the Global South.” Big Data & Society7 (1): 1–15.
27.
SilverstoneRoger. 1994. Television and Everyday Life. London: Routledge.
28.
TavoryIddoTimmermansStefan. 2014. Abductive Analysis: Theorizing Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
UricchioWilliam. 2004. “Television’s Next Generation: Technology/Interface Culture/Flow.” In Television After TV: Essays on a Medium in Transition, edited by SpigelLynnOlssonJan, 163–83. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
31.
UricchioWilliam. 2009. “The Future of a Medium Once Known as Television.” In The YouTube Reader, edited by SnickarsPelleVonderauPatrick, 24–39. New York: Columbia University Press.
32.
UricchioWilliam. 2013. “Constructing Television. Thirty Years That Froze an Otherwise Dynamic Medium.” In After the Break: Television Theory Today, edited by TeurlingsJande ValckMarijke, 65–78. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
33.
Vázquez-HerreroJorgeNegreira-ReyMaría-CruzRodríguez-VázquezAna-Isabel. 2021. “Intersections Between TikTok and TV: Channels and Programmes Thinking Outside the Box.” Journalism and Media2 (1): 1–13.
34.
WilliamsRaymond. 1975. Television: Technology and Cultural Form. New York: Schocken Books.
