Through a study of mimetic political videos produced by civil society groups and mainstream political parties during state-level elections in the east Indian West Bengal in 2021, this paper explores how diverse actors evoked politics of fun as a strategy to resist and extend digital nationalism. Fun has been theorized as “a political matter”; and as an agent to undermine hegemony. Fun also remained an indelible feature of right wing mobilization and nationalism. Everyday digital practices are articulated through wit, parody, sarcasm, and “memification”; and translate to joyful conducts, spontaneity and lightness, or fun. Drawing from Lempert’s “mimetic practice,” this research argues that fun emerges as the site of “mimetic resistance” or ideological tension, as diverse political actors negotiate cultural identity through challenge to cultural purity and engagement with news.
AG. 2022. Interview by author, September 20. Zoom.
2.
BaishyaAnirban K.2021. “The Conquest of the World as Meme: Memetic Visuality and Political Humor in Critiques of the Hindu Right Wing in India.” Media Culture & Society43 (6): 1113–35.
3.
BasuLaura. 2018. “News Satire: Giving the News a Memory.” TripleC16 (1): 241–255.
4.
BayatAsef. 2007. “Islamism and the Politics of Fun.” Public Culture19 (3): 433–459.
5.
BaymGeoffreyJonesJeffrey P.2013. “News Parody in Global Perspective: Politics, Power, and Resistance.” In News Parody and Political Satire Across the Globe, edited by GeoffreyBaymJonesJeffrey P., 1–12. London: Routledge.
6.
BebićDomagojVolarevicMarija. 2018. “Do Not Mess With a Meme: The Use of Viral Content in Communicating Politics.” Communication & Society31 (3): 43–54.
CarlanHannah. 2015. “Dented, Painted, and Proud’: Satire on Indian Social Media After the 2012 Delhi Gang Rape.” Texas Linguistics Forum58 (2): 11–22.
15.
ChadhaKalyaniKumarSangeetParameswaranRadhika. 2021. “Introduction to the Special Issue Forum “Digital Cultures of South Asia: Inequalities, Informatization, Infrastructures”.” Communication Culture & Critique14 (3): 487–490.
16.
DavisJenny L.LoveTony P.KillenGemma. 2018. “Seriously Funny: The Political Work of Humor on Social Media.” New Media & Society20 (10): 3898–916.
17.
FuchsChristian. 2018. “Racism, Nationalism and Right-Wing Extremism Online: The Austrian Presidential Election 2016 on Facebook.” In Critical Theory and Authoritarian Populism, edited by JeremiahMorelock, 157–206. London: University of Westminster Press.
18.
HardyKathryn C.2015. “Constituting a Diffuse Region: Cartographies of Mass-Mediated Bhojpuri Belonging.” BioScope66 (2): 145–164.
19.
HirschkindCharles. 2006. The Ethical Soundscape: Cassettes Sermons and Islamic Counterpublics. New York: Columbia University Press.
20.
HsiehHFShannonSE. 2005. “Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis.” Qualitative Health Research15 (9): 1277–1288.
21.
JaffrelotChristopheVerniersGilles. 2020. “The BJP’s 2019 Election Campaign: Not Business as Usual.” Contemporary South Asia28 (2): 155–77.
22.
JenzenOluErhartItirEslen-ZiyaHandeGüçdemirDeryaKorkutUmutMcGarryAidan. 2020. “Music Videos as Protest Communication: The Gezi Park Protest on Youtube.” In The Aesthetics of Global Protest, edited by McGarryAidanErhartItirEslen-ZiyaHandeJenzenOluKorkutUmut, 211–232. Dublin, Ireland: Amsterdam University Press.
23.
KumarSangeet. 2015. “Contagious Memes, Viral Videos and Subversive Parody: The Grammar of Contention on the Indian Web.” International Communication Gazette77 (3): 232–247.
24.
LainesteLiisiVoolaidPiret. 2017. “Laughing Across Borders: Intertextuality of Internet Memes.” European Journal of Humour Research4 (4): 26–49.
25.
LempertMichael. 2014. “Imitation.” Annual Review of Anthropology43 (1): 379–395.
26.
MassanariAdrienne. 2017. “#G amergate and the Fappening: How Reddit’s Algorithm, Governance, and Culture Support Toxic Technocultures.” New Media & Society19 (3): 329–346.
MortensenMetteNeumayerChristina. 2021. “The Playful Politics of Memes.” Information Communication & Society24 (16): 2367–2377.
29.
NathSumanChowdhurySubhoprotim Roy. 2019. “Mapping Polarisation: Four Ethnographic Cases from West Bengal.” Journal of the Indian Anthropological Society/the Indian Anthropological Society54 (2): 51–64.
30.
NathSumanRaySubhasish. 2022. “Political Campaigning in West Bengal: Violence, Professionalisation, and Communalisation.” South Asian History and Culture13 (3): 305–20.
31.
NeyaziTaberez A.2017. “Social Media And Political Polarization in India.” Seminar699: 31–35.
32.
NissenbaumAsafShifman.Limor2018. “Meme Templates as Expressive Repertoires in a Globalizing World: A Cross-Linguistic Study.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication23 (5): 294–310. 2018.
PenneyJoel. 2017. The Citizen Marketer. New York: Oxford University Press.
43.
PenneyJoel. 2020. “It’s So Hard Not to be Funny in This Situation’: Memes and Humor in U.S. Youth Online Political Expression.” Television & New Media21 (8): 791–806.
44.
PereraSasankaPathakDev N.2022. “Introduction Cultural Politics of Humour in South Asia.” In Humour and the Performance of Power in South Asia Anxiety, Laughter and Politics in Unstable Times, edited by PereraSasankaPathakDev N., 1–22. Oxon, Abingdon and New York, New York: Routledge.
45.
RajadhyakshaAshish. 2003. “The ‘Bollywoodization’ of the Indian Cinema: Cultural Nationalism in a Global Arena.” Inter-Asia Cultural Studies4 (1): 25–39.
46.
SchneiderFlorian. 2016. “The Cultural Governance of Mass Media in Contemporary China.” In Handbook of Cultural and Creative Industries in China, edited by KeaneMichael, 189-206. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
47.
SchneiderFlorian. 2018. China’s Digital Nationalism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
48.
SchneiderFlorian. 2022. “Emergent Nationalism in China’s Sociotechnical Networks: How Technological Affordance and Complexity Amplify Digital Nationalism.” Nations and Nationalism28 (1): 267–285.
49.
SchroederRalph. 2018. Social Theory After the Internet Media, Technology and Globalization. London, UK: University College London Press.
50.
ShifmanLimor. 2013. “Memes in a Digital World: Reconciling With a Conceptual Troublemaker.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication18 (3): 362–377. 2013.
51.
SinghShiv Sahay. May4, 2021. “‘No vote for BJP’ campaign helped TMC register a massive victory.” The Hindu. .
52.
SM. 2022. Interview by author, September 27. Zoom.
53.
SongLin. 2023. “Politics of Fun and Participatory censorship: China’s Reception of Animal Crossing: New Horizons.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies29 (6): 1453–1464.
TrereEmiliano. 2022. Hybrid Media Activism Ecologies, Imaginaries, Algorithms. Oxon, OX, UK; New York, NY: Routledge.
56.
UdupaSahana. 2019. “Nationalism in the Digital Age: Fun as a Metapractice of Extreme Speech.” Journal of International Communication13 (2019): 3143–63.
57.
UdupaSahanaVenkatramanShriramKhanAasim. 2020. “Millennial India’: Global Digital Politics in Context.” Television & New Media21 (4): 343–59.
58.
US. 2022. Interview by author, October 18. Zoom.
59.
WayLyndon C. S.2012. “Turkish Popular Music Videos as a Multimodal Site of Resistance.” Multimodal Communication1 (3): 251–75.
60.
WedeenLisa. 2013. “Ideology and Humor in Dark Times: Notes From Syria.” Critical Inquiry39 (4): 841–73.
61.
ZouSheng. 2020. “Beneath the bitter laughter: Online parodies, structures of feeling and cultural citizenship in China.” Global Media and Communication16(2): 131–147.
