From After School Specials to After School Threesomes: Industrial Shifts in the Depiction of Sex on Teen TV and its Formation of the Sex Positive Teen Girl
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May, 2024
From After School Specials to After School Threesomes: Industrial Shifts in the Depiction of Sex on Teen TV and its Formation of the Sex Positive Teen Girl
A rash of teen TV shows that deal with stories and depictions of sex explicitly and graphically prove a marked change from the overtly pedagogical approach teen television shows of the past took to tackling controversial issues. Utilizing industry interviews to understand this shift, I argue that series include progressive rhetoric, specifically sex positive rhetoric lifted from the popular feminist movement, in their stories of teen sexuality in order to mitigate controversies that inevitably crop up in public discourse whenever teen sexuality is represented. In so doing, such series shape the potential and parameters of teen girl sexuality. This framing provides for a more capacious spectrum of sexuality for girls, namely in more nuanced and more frequent depictions of queer sexuality and sexually agentive girls. Yet it also highlights the dangers their sexuality poses living in a patriarchal world, subsequently upholding framings of caution and boundaries around girlhood sexuality.
ArthursJaneZachariasUsha. 2006. “Introduction: Sex Education and the Media.” Feminist Media Studies6 (4): 539–56.
2.
Banet-WeiserSarah. 2018. Empowered: Popular Feminism and Popular Misogyny. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
3.
BavidgeJenny. 2004. “Chosen Ones: Reading the Contemporary Teen Heroine.” In Teen TV: Genre, Consumption, Identity, edited by DavisGlynDickinsonKay, 41–53. London: BFI Pub.
4.
Bay-ChengLaina Y.2015. “The Agency Line: A Neoliberal Metric for Appraising Young Women’s Sexuality.” Sex Roles73: 279–91.
BuckinghamDavidBraggSara. 2004. Young People, Sex and the Media: The Facts of Life?London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
8.
CohnJonathanPorstJennifer. 2021. “A Very Special Introduction.” In Very Special Episodes: Televising Industrial and Social Change, edited by CohnJonathanPorstJennifer, 1–17. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
9.
CurtinMichael. 1996. “On Edge: Culture Industries in the Neo-network Era.” In Making and Selling Culture, edited by OhmannRichardAverillGageCurtinMichael, 181–202. Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press.
10.
DavisGlyn. 2004. “Saying It Out Loud’: Reading TV’s Queer Teens.” In Teen TV: Genre, Consumption, Identity, edited by DavisGlynDickinsonKay, 127–40. London: BFI Pub.
11.
DavisGlynDickinsonKay. 2004. “Introduction.” In Teen TV: Genre, Consumption, Identity, edited by DavisGlynDickinsonKay, 1–16. London: BFI Pub.
GrossLarry. 2001. Up From Invisibility: Lesbians, Gay Men and the Media in America. New York: Columbia University Press.
17.
HavensTimothyLotzAmanda D.TinicSerra. 2009. “Critical Media Industry Studies: A Research Approach.” Communication Culture & Critique2 (2): 234–53.
18.
HendershotHeather. 1998. Saturday Morning Censors: Television Regulation Before the V- Chip. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
19.
HilmesMichele. 2005. “The Bad Object: Television in the American Academy.” Cinema Journal45 (1): 111–7.
20.
KearneyMary Celeste. 2007. “The Changing Face of Television, or Why We All Love Buffy.” In Undead TV: Critical Writings on Buffy the Vampire Slayer, edited by ParksLisaLevineElana, 17–42. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
21.
KeelerAmanda Renee. 2016. “Premature Adulthood: Alcoholic Moms and Teenage Adults in the ABC Afterschool Specials.” Quarterly Review of Film and Video33 (6): 483–500.
NewmanMichael Z.LevineElana. 2012. Legitimating Television: Media Convergence and Cultural Status. New York and London: Routledge.
24.
OsgerbyBill. 2004. “So Who’s Got Time for Adults!’: Development of Teen TV From Gidget to Buffy.” In Teen TV: Genre, Consumption, Identity, edited by DavisGlynDickinsonKay, 71–86. London: BFI Pub.
Passanante ElmanJulie. 2010. “After School Special Education: Rehabilitative Television, Teen Citizenship, and Compulsory Able-Bodiedness.” Television & New Media11 (4): 260–92.
27.
PikeKirsten. 2011. “Lessons in Liberation: Schooling Girls in Feminism and Femininity in 1970s ABC Afterschool Specials.” Girlhood Studies4 (1): 95–113.
28.
RossSharon Marie. 2008. “Defining Teen Culture: The N Network.” In Teen Television: Essays on Programming and Fandom, edited by RossSharon MarieSteinLouisa, 61–77. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
29.
RossSharon MarieLouisaStein. 2008. “Introduction.” In Teen Television: Essays on Programming and Fandom, edited by RossSharon MarieSteinLouisa, 3–26. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
TolmanDeborah L.AndersonStephanie M.BelmonteKimberly. 2015. “Mobilizing Metaphor: Considering Complexities, Contradictions, and Contexts in Adolescent Girls’ and Young Women’s Sexual Agency.” Sex Roles73 (7-8): 298–310.
34.
WilksLauren. 2021. “From Colorblind to Culturally Specific: Examining Racial Specificity Over Time in Teen TV.” Society for Cinema and Media Studies Conference, March 17, Virtual.
