This article examines a new form of resistance to right-wing populist discourse on social media which I define as counter-populist algorithmic activism. Practitioners of this type of activism exploit platforms’ automated ranking mechanisms and interface design to bolster the online visibility of counter-populist voices. By so doing, activists seek to stymie the digitally mediated spread of right-wing populist rhetoric and advance an alternative, non-exclusionary vision of “the people.” To explore this nascent form of resistance, this study draws on a year-long online ethnography of a Facebook group of Israeli activists called Strengthening the Left Online. Through an observation of the group’s activities during 2017, as well as interviews with its main administrator and other left-wing Facebook users, I elucidate the distinctive nature of the motivations, strategies, and goals that guide counter-populist algorithmic activists.
Baldwin-PhilippiJessica. 2019. “The Technological Performance of Populism.” New Media & Society21 (2): 376–97.
3.
BennettW. LanceLivingstonSteven. 2018. “The Disinformation Order: Disruptive Communication and the Decline of Democratic Institutions.” European Journal of Communication33 (2): 122–39.
4.
BraccialeRobertaMartellaAntonio. 2017. “Define the Populist Political Communication Style: The Case of Italian Political Leaders on Twitter.” Information Communication & Society20 (9): 1310–29.
5.
BucherTaina. 2018. If. . .Then: Algorithmic Power and Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
Castelli GattinaraPietroBouronSamuel. 2020. “Extreme-Right Communication in Italy and France: Political Culture and Media Practices in CasaPound Italia and Les Identitaires.” Information Communication & Society23 (12): 1805–19.
7.
ChakravarttyPaulaRoySrirupa. 2015. “Mr. Modi Goes to Delhi: Mediated Populism and the 2014 Indian Elections.” Television & New Media16 (4): 311–22.
8.
EngesserSvenFawziNaylaLarssonAnders Olof. 2017a. “Populist Online Communication: Introduction to the Special Issue.” Information Communication & Society20 (9): 1279–92.
9.
EngesserSvenErnstNicoleEsserFrankBüchelFlorin. 2017b. “Populism and Social Media: How Politicians Spread a Fragmented Ideology.” Information Communication & Society20 (8): 1109–26.
10.
ErnstNicoleEngesserSvenBüchelFlorinBlassnigSinaEsserFrank. 2017. “Extreme Parties and Populism: An Analysis of Facebook and Twitter Across Six Countries.” Information Communication & Society20 (9): 1347–64.
11.
FarkasJohanNeumayerChristina. 2017. “‘Stop Fake Hate Profiles on Facebook’: Challenges for Crowdsourced Activism on Social Media.” First Monday22 (9). doi:10.5210/fm.v22i9.8042
12.
FilcDani. 2009. The Political Right in Israel: Different Faces of Jewish Populism. New York: Routledge.
13.
FilcDaniLebelUdi. 2005. “The Post-Oslo Israeli Populist Radical Right in Comparative Perspective: Leadership, Voter Characteristics and Political Discourse.” Mediterranean Politics10 (1): 85–97.
14.
GearhartShericeZhangWeiwu. 2015. ““Was It Something I Said?” “No, It Was Something You Posted!” A Study of the Spiral of Silence Theory in Social Media Contexts.” Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking18 (4): 208–13.
15.
GerbaudoPaolo. 2018. “Social Media and Populism: An Elective Affinity?” Media Culture & Society40 (5): 745–53.
16.
GidronNoamBonikowskiBart. 2013. “Varieties of Populism: Literature Review and Research Agenda.” 13–0004. Working Paper Series, Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2459387.
17.
HatakkaNiko. 2020. “Expose, Debunk, Ridicule, Resist! Networked Civic Monitoring of Populist Radical Right Online Action in Finland.” Information Communication & Society23: 1311–26.
18.
JagersJanWalgraveStefaan. 2007. “Populism as Political Communication Style: An Empirical Study of Political Parties’ Discourse in Belgium.” European Journal of Political Research46 (3): 319–45.
19.
JansenRobert S.2011. “Populist Mobilization: A New Theoretical Approach to Populism.” Sociological Theory29 (2): 75–96.
20.
JohnNicholas A.Dvir-GvirsmanShira. 2015. “‘I Don’t Like You Any More’: Facebook Unfriending by Israelis During the Israel-Gaza Conflict of 2014.” Journal of Communication65 (6): 953–74.
21.
KimmerlingBaruch. 2001. The Invention and Decline of Israeliness: State, Society, and the Military. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
22.
KozinetsRobert V.2010. Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
23.
KrämerBenjamin. 2017. “Populist Online Practices: The Function of the Internet in Right-Wing Populism.” Information Communication & Society20 (9): 1293–309.
24.
KunstmanAdiSteinRebecca. 2015. Digital Militarism: Israel’s Occupation in the Social Media Age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
25.
LaclauErnesto. 2005. On Populist Reason. London: Verso.
MalyIco. 2019. “New Right Metapolitics and the Algorithmic Activism of Schild & Vrienden.” Social Media + Society5 (2): 1–15.
29.
MuddeCas. 2004. “The Populist Zeitgeist.” Government and Opposition39 (4): 541–63.
30.
MüllerJan-Werner. 2014. “‘The People Must Be Extracted From Within the People’: Reflections on Populism.” Constellations21 (4): 483–93.
31.
MüllerJan-Werner. 2016. What Is Populism?Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
32.
OliverJ. EricRahnW. M. 2016. “Rise of the Trumpenvolk: Populism in the 2016 Election.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science667 (1): 189–206.
33.
PedahzurAmi. 2012. The Triumph of Israels Radical Right. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34.
StierSebastianPoschLisaBleierArnimStrohmaierMarkus. 2017. “When Populists Become Popular: Comparing Facebook Use by the Right-Wing Movement Pegida and German Political Parties.” Information Communication & Society20 (9): 1365–88.
35.
StoycheffElizabeth. 2016. “Under Surveillance: Examining Facebook’s Spiral of Silence Effects in the Wake of NSA Internet Monitoring.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly93 (2): 296–311.
36.
SunsteinCass R.2017. #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37.
TaggartPaul. 2000. Populism. Buckingham: Open University Press.
TreréEmiliano. 2018. Hybrid Media Activism: Ecologies, Imaginaries, Algorithms. New York: Routledge.
40.
Van KesselStijnCasteleinRemco. 2016. “Shifting the Blame. Populist Politicians’ Use of Twitter as a Tool of Opposition.” Journal of Contemporary European Research12 (2): 954–614.
41.
VelkovaJuliaKaunAnne. 2021. “Algorithmic Resistance: Media Practices and the Politics of Repair.” Information Communication & Society24: 523–40.
42.
WaisbordSilvioAmadoAdriana. 2017. “Populist Communication by Digital Means: Presidential Twitter in Latin America.” Information Communication & Society20 (9): 1330–46.
ZiegeleMarcNaabTeresa K.JostPablo. 2020. “Lonely Together? Identifying the Determinants of Collective Corrective Action Against Uncivil Comments.” New Media & Society22: 731–51.
