Beneath Turkish TV dramas’ global glamor lie workplace accidents, systemic injuries on workers’ bodies, and deaths. In response, workers seek to impose restraints on what can be done to their bodies by resorting to law and evoking ideals of equality as they struggle for workplace safety, healthcare, and dignity. Drawing on ethnographic research across production sets, industry summits, union meetings and more than fifty interviews since 2015, this article documents drama workers’ bodily vulnerabilities, arguing that precarity in this global media industry is a bodily phenomenon legally sanctioned by the state. I dewesternize the notion of precarity in creative industries by foregrounding the materiality of the body and the regulative power of law as centers of exploitation and resistance. Critical scholars of media production could learn from non-Western contexts in identifying how creative workers do not only demand stable incomes but also legal recognition and protection of their bodies.
AlacovskaAnaGillRosalind. 2019. “De-Westernizing Creative Labour Studies: The Informality of Creative Work From an Ex-Centric Perspective.” International Journal of Cultural Studies22 (2): 195–212.
4.
AlganEceKaptanYeşim. 2021. “Turkey’s TV Celebrities as Cultural Envoys: The Role of Celebrity Diplomacy in Nation Branding and the Pursuit of Soft Power.” Popular Communication19 (3): 222–34.
5.
BettiEloisa. 2018. “Historicizing Precarious Work: Forty Years of Research in the Social Sciences and Humanities.” International Review of Social History63 (2): 273–319.
6.
BhuttoFatima. 2019. New Kings of the World: Dispatches From Bollywood, Dizi and K-Pop. New York: Penguin Random House.
7.
Bozkurt-GüngenSümercan. 2018. “Labour and Authoritarian Neoliberalism: Changes and Continuities Under the AKP Governments in Turkey.” South European Society & Politics23 (2): 219–38.
8.
BremanJan. 2013. “A Bogus Concept?” New Left ReviewII (no. 84): 130–38.
9.
BuğraAyşe. 2020. “Politics of Social Policy in a Late Industrializing Country: The Case of Turkey.” Development and Change51 (2): 442–62.
10.
BulutErgin. 2020. A Precarious Game: The Illusion of Dream Jobs in the Video Game Industry. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
11.
BulutErginCanBaşak. 2021. “Media, Affect, and Authoritarian Futures in ‘New Turkey:’ Spectacular Confessions on Television in the Post-Coup Era.” Communication Culture & Critique13 (4): 403–21.
12.
ButlerJudith. 2006. Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London: Verso.
13.
CaldwellJohn Thornton. 2008. Production Culture: Industrial Reflexivity and Critical Practice in Film and Television. Durham, N.C: Duke University Press.
14.
CarneyJosh. 2014. “Re-Creating History and Recreating Publics: The Success and Failure of Recent Ottoman Costume Dramas in Turkish Media.” European Journal of Turkish Studies (19): 1–25.
15.
CarneyJosh. 2015. “A Dizi-Ying Past: Magnificent Century and the Motivated Uses of History in Contemporary Turkey.” Ph.D., Bloomington: Indiana University.
16.
ÇelenkSevilay. 2005. Televizyon, Temsil, Kültür. Ankara: Ütopya Yayınevi.
17.
CelenkSevilay. 2018. “Kendi Dizi’mizin Dibinde: Yerli Diziler Ve Kültürel Iktidar Mücadelesi.” Birikim (no. 347): 125–35.
18.
Celik RappasIpek AKayhanSezen. 2018. “TV Series Production and the Urban Restructuring of Istanbul.” Television & New Media19 (1): 3–23.
19.
CernyPhilip G.2010. “The Competition State Today: Fromraison d’Étattoraison Du Monde.” Policy Studies31 (1): 5–21.
20.
CetinFeride. 2017. “Sinema ve Televizyon Sektorune Genel Br Bakis: Oyuncularin Calisma Kosullari.” In Sahne ve Perde Calisanlarinin Hukuki Sorunlari, edited by AlpagutGulsevil, 19–23. Istanbul: Aristo.
21.
ÇevikSenem B.2019. “Turkish Historical Television Series: Public Broadcasting of Neo-Ottoman Illusions.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies19 (2): 227–42.
22.
ÇevikSenem B.2020. “The Empire Strikes Back: Propagating AKP’s Ottoman Empire Narrative on Turkish Television.” Middle East Critique29 (2): 177–97.
23.
ColesAmanda. 2016. “Creative Class Politics: Unions and the Creative Economy.” International Journal of Cultural Policy22 (3): 456–72.
24.
MichaelCurtinSansonKevin, eds. 2017. Voices of Labor: Creativity, Craft, and Conflict in Global Hollywood. California: University of California Press.
25.
MichaelCurtinSansonKevinCurtinMichaelSansonKevin, eds. 2016. Precarious Creativity: Global Media, Local Labor. Oakland, California: University of California Press.
26.
de PeuterGreigCohenNicole. 2015. “Emerging Labour Politics in Creative Industries.” In The Routledge Companion to the Cultural Industries, edited by OakleyKateO’ConnorJustin, 305–18. New York, NY: Routledge.
27.
DinlerDemet Şahende. 2018. “New Workers’ Struggles in Turkey Since the 2000s: Possibilities and Limits.” In The Class Strikes Back: Self-Organized Workers’ Struggles in the Twenty-First Century, edited by AzzelliniDarioKraftMichael G, 217–38. Leiden: Brill.
28.
EmersonRobertFretzRachelShawLinda. 1995. Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.
29.
ErolMehmet Erman. 2019. “State and Labour Under AKP Rule in Turkey: An Appraisal.” Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies21 (6): 663–77.
FeredayJenniferMuir-CochraneEimear. 2006. “Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods5 (1): 80–92.
FordeChrisSlaterGary. 2016. “Labour Market Regulation and the ‘Competition State’: An Analysis of the Implementation of the Agency Working Regulations in the UK.” Work Employment & Society30 (4): 590–606.
34.
GantiTejaswini. 2012. Producing Bollywood: Inside the Contemporary Hindi Film Industry. Durham: Duke University Press.
35.
GantiTejaswini. 2016. “‘No One Thinks in Hindi Here’ Language Hierarchies in Bollywood.” In Precarious Creativity, edited by MichaelCurtinSansonKevin, 118–31. California: University of California Press.
36.
HillSean. 2017. “Precarity in the Era of #BlackLivesMatter.” WSQ Women s Studies Quarterly45 (3-4): 94–109.
İSİG. 2020. İş Cinayetleri Raporu 2020. Istanbul: İSİG.
40.
JainLochlann. 2006. Injury: The Politics of Product Design and Safety Law in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
41.
Johansson WilénEvelina. 2021. “Ethics and Political Imagination in Feminist Theory.” Feminist Theory22 (2): 268–83.
42.
KadıgilSera. 2017. “Uygulamada Karşılaşılan Sorunlar Ve Çözüm Önerileri.” In Sahne ve Perde Çalışanlarının Hukuki Sorunları, edited by AlpagutGulsevil, 135–44. İstanbul: Aristo.
43.
KonuşluFırat. 2012. Production and Labour Process of the Contemporary Turkish Private Television Series. M.A, Ankara: ODTU.
44.
KraidyMarwan. 2019. “Boycotting Neo-Ottoman Cool: Geopolitics and Media Industries in the Egypt-Turkey Row Over Television Drama.” Middle East Journal of Culture and Communication (no. 12): 149–65.
45.
LoreyIsabel. 2014. State of Insecurity: Government of the Precarious. London: Verso.
46.
MartinSylvia J.2012a. Haunted: An Ethnography of the Hollywood and Hong Kong Media Industries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47.
MartinSylvia J.2012b. “Of Ghosts and Gangsters: Capitalist Cultural Production and the Hong Kong Film Industry.” Visual Anthropology Review28 (1): 32–49.
48.
MayerVickiBanksMirandaCaldwellJohn Thornton, eds. 2009. Production Studies: Cultural Studies of Media Industries. New York & London: Routledge.
49.
MillarKathleen M.2014. “The Precarious Present: Wageless Labor and Disrupted Life in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.” Cultural Anthropology29 (1): 32–53.
50.
MoléNoelle J. 2010. “Precarious Subjects: Anticipating Neoliberalism in Northern Italy’s Workplace.” American Anthropologist112 (1): 38–53.
51.
NeilsonTai. 2018. “Unions in Digital Labour Studies: A Review of Information Society and Marxist Autonomist Approaches.” TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society16 (2): 882–900.
52.
Nyong’oTavia. 2013. “Situating Precarity Between the Body and the Commons.” Women & Performance a journal of feminist theory23 (2): 157–61.
53.
ObiayaIkechukwu, Andrew2012. “Behind the Scenes: The Hidden Face of Nollywood.” In Working in the Global Film and Television Industries: Creativity, Systems, Space, Patronage, edited by DawsonSean PHolmes, 109–23. London: Bloomsbury.
54.
PatemanCarole. 2002. “Self-Ownership and Property in the Person: Democratization and a Tale of Two Concepts.” Journal of Political Philosophy10 (1): 20–53.
55.
PetrynaAdriana. 2002. Life Exposed: Biological Citizens After Chernobyl. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
56.
RATEM. 2019. “Türkiye Radyo Ve Televizyon Yayıncılığı Sektör Raporu. İstanbul: Radyo Televizyon Yayıncıları Meslek Birliği.
57.
RidoutNicholasSchneiderRebecca. 2012. “Precarity and Performance: An Introduction.” The Drama Review TDR56 (4): 5–9.
58.
SalamandraChrista. 2012. “The Muhannad Effect: Media Panic, Melodrama, and the Arab Female Gaze.” Anthropological Quarterly85 (1): 45–77.
59.
SalamonErrol. 2016. “E-Lancer Resistance: Precarious Freelance Journalists Use Digital Communications to Refuse Rights-Grabbing Contracts.” Digital Journalism4 (8): 980–1000.
60.
ShillingChris. 1993. The Body and Social Theory. London ; Newbury Park, California: SAGE.
61.
StahlMatt. 2012. Unfree Masters: Recording Artists and the Politics of Work. Refiguring American Music. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
62.
SümerBurcuTaşOğuzhan. 2020. “The Regulation of Television Content in Turkey: From State Monopoly to Commercial Broadcasting and Beyond.” In Television in Turkey: Local Production, Transnational Expansion and Political Aspirations, edited by KaptanYeşimAlganEce, 27–47. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave MacMillan.
TokdoğanNagehan. 2020. “Reading Politics through Emotions: Ontological Ressentiment as the Emotional Basis of Current Politics in Turkey.” Nations and Nationalism26: 388–406.
65.
YanardağoğluEylemTurhallıNeval. 2020. “From TRT to Netflix: Implications of Convergence for Television Dramas in Turkey.” In Television in Turkey: Local Production, Transnational Expansion and Political Aspirations, edited by KaptanYeşimAlganEce, 189–204. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
66.
YesilBilge. 2015. “Transnationalization of Turkish Dramas: Exploring the Convergence of Local and Global Market Imperatives.” Global Media and Communication11: 43–60. April.
67.
YeşilBilge. 2018. “Authoritarian Turn or Continuity? Governance of Media Through Capture and Discipline in the AKP Era.” South European Society & Politics23 (2): 239–57.
68.
Yıldız-HakkakulÖzge. 2017. “Sahne ve Perde Çalışanlarının Hukuki Statüsü.” In Sahne ve Perde Çalışanlarının Hukuki Sorunları, edited by AlpagutGülsevil, 23–74, İstanbul: Aristo.
