For the past several years, media commentary and cultural analysis has grown increasingly fixated on YouTube as a radicalization hub, particularly around extremist, alt-right content. However, a growing community of leftist YouTube content creators, loosely coalescing into the platform’s “LeftTube,” have developed dialogic relationships with some of YouTube’s most extreme content. This work focuses on one specific LeftTube creator, ContraPoints, to explore how those on the political left engage with YouTube’s cultural and technical affordances to challenge alt-right ideology. Through a textual analysis of ContraPoints’ top thirty videos, we identified three main discursive strategies: practicing deradicalization strategies on YouTube; establishing alt-right individuals as an intentional audience; and developing a language for escaping alt-right logics. ContraPoints, and her rightful critics, demonstrate how political subjectivities are created and contested within YouTube as both a technical and cultural space.
Banet-WeiserSarah. 2018. Empowered: Popular Feminism and Popular Misogyny. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
4.
BaymNancyDanahBoyd. 2012. “Socially Mediated Publicness: An Introduction.” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media56 (3): 320–9.
5.
BenklerYochaiFarisRobertRobertsHal (2018). Networked Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
BlodgettBridgetSalterAnastasia. 2018. “Ghostbusters is for Boys: Understanding Masculinity’s Role in the Rise of the Alt-Right.” Communication, Culture, and Critique11 (1): 133–46.
7.
boyddanah. 2010. “Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications.” In Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites, edited by PapacharissiZ., 39-58. London: Routledge.
CotterKelley. 2018. “Playing the Visibility Game: How Digital Influencers and Algorithms Negotiate Influence on Instagram.” New Media & Society21 (4): 895–913.
DeanJodi. 2005. “Communicative Capitalism: Circulation and the Foreclosure of Politics.” Cultural Politics1 (1): 51–74.
28.
DonovanJoanboyddanah. 2019. “Stop the Presses? Moving from Strategic Silence to Strategic Amplification in a Networked Media Ecosystem.” American Behavioral Scientist. Online ahead of print. doi:10.1177/0002764219878229
29.
DuffyBrooke Erin. 2017. Not Getting Paid to Do What You Love: Gender, Social Media, and Aspirational Work. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
EbnerJulia. 2019. “Counter-Creativity: Innovative Ways to Counter Far-Right Communication Tactics.” In Post-Digital Cultures of the Far-Right: Online Actions and Offline Consequences in Europe and the US, edited by FielitzM.ThurstonN., 169–82. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
HallStuart. 1975. “Introduction.” In Paper Voices: The Popular Press and Social Change, 1935-1965, edited by SmithA. C. H., 11–24. London: Chatto & Windus.
41.
HallStuart. 1979. “The Great Moving Right Show.” Marxism Today, January, 14–20.
42.
HallStuart. 1980. “Encoding/Decoding.” In Culture, Media, Language, edited by HallS.HobsonD.LoveA.WillisP., 128–38. London: Hutchinson.
43.
HallStuart. 1981. “Notes on Deconstructing “The Popular”.” In People’s History and Socialist Theory, edited by SamuelR., 227–40. London: Routledge.
44.
KuehnKathleenSalterLeon. 2020. “Assessing Digital Threats to Democracy, and Workable Solutions: A Review of the Recent Literature.” International Journal of Cultural Studies14 (1): 2589–610.
45.
LewisRebecca. 2018. Alternative Influence: Broadcasting the Reactionary Right on YouTube. New York: Data & Society Research Institute.
46.
LewisRebecca. 2019. ““This is What the News Won’t Show You”: YouTube Creators and the Reactionary Politics of Micro-celebrity.” Television & New Media21 (2):201–17.
47.
LoewingerMicah. 2019. On the Media. In Internal Scream, edited by GladstoneB.New York: WNYC Studios.
OngJonathan Corpus. 2020. “Limits and Luxuries of Slow Research in Radical War: How Should We Represent Perpetrators?” Digital War1–6. Online ahead of print. DOI: 10.1057/s42984-020-00006-x
57.
PhillipovMichelle. 2013. “In Defense of Textual Analysis: Resisting Methodological Hegemony in Media and Cultural Studies.” Critical Studies in Media Communication30 (3): 209–23.
58.
PhillipsWhitney. 2015. This is Why We Can’t Have Nice Things: Mapping the Relationship between Online Trolling and Mainstream Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
59.
PhillipsWhitney. 2018. The Oxygen of Amplification: Better Practices for Reporting on Extremists, Antagonists, and Manipulators. New York: Data & Society Research Institute.
60.
PhillipsWhitney. 2019. “It Wasn’t Just the Trolls: Early Internet Culture, ‘Fun,’ and the Fires of Exclusionary Laughter.” Social Media + Society5 (3): 205630511984949.
61.
PhillipsWhitneyMilnerRyan M.2017. The Ambivalent Internet: Mischief, Oddity, and Antagonism Online. Cambridge: Polity.
62.
SeguraMaria SoledadWaisbordSilvio. 2019. “Between data capitalism and data citizenship.” Television and New Media20 (4): 412–9.
63.
ShawAdrienne. 2017. “Encoding and Decoding Affordances: Stuart Hall and Interactive Media Technologies.” Media, Culture, & Society39 (4): 592–602.
