Patriarchal bargains have been studied in many settings as a strategy that helps women circumvent constraints and forge spaces for individual empowerment. Despite the growing use of mediated communication, little is known about how patriarchal bargains are enacted and realized within online interactions such as in discussion forums. By analyzing how Chinese unwed single mothers renegotiate the state’s oppressive population control and gender policies through their online activity, this study proposes the concept of “online patriarchal bargain” to extend patriarchal bargain theory to women’s Internet use. It further explores linkages between social support and patriarchal bargain to elucidate how support is integral to enacting agency in the face of forbidding systemic constraints. The findings also delve into the role of therapeutic culture in the day-to-day experiences of women, especially those in marginalized communities.
AlianmoghaddamNargesPhibbsSuzanneBennCheryl. 2019. “‘I Did a Lot of Googling’: A Qualitative Study of Exclusive Breastfeeding Support through Social Media.” Women and Birth32 (2): 147–56.
2.
ArieliDaniella. 2007. “The Task of Being Content: Expatriate Wives in Beijing, Emotional Work and Patriarchal Bargain.” Journal of International Women’s Studies8 (4): 18–31.
3.
BeckerDana. 2005. The Myth of Empowerment: Women and the Therapeutic Culture in America. New York: New York University Press.
4.
BradyEllenGuerinSuzanne. 2010. “‘Not the Romantic, All Happy, Coochy Coo Experience’: A Qualitative Analysis of Interactions on an Irish Parenting Web Site.” Family Relations59 (1): 14–27.
5.
BragadóttirHelga. 2008. “Computer-mediated Support Group Intervention for Parents.” Journal of Nursing Scholarship40 (1): 32–38.
6.
CaoWeiwei. 2015. “Exploring ‘Glorious Motherhood’ in Chinese Abortion Law and Policy.” Feminist Legal Studies23 (3): 295–318.
CohenSheldonSymeLeonard. 1985. “Issues in the Study and Application of Social Support.” In Social Support and Health, edited by CohenSheldonSymeLeonard, 3–22. Orlando: Academic Press.
9.
ConnellRaewyn. 1987. Gender and Power: Society, the Person and Sexual Politics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
10.
CorbinJulietStraussAnselm. 2014. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 3rd ed.Thousand Oaks: Sage.
11.
CutronaCarolynSuhrJulie. 1992. “Controllability of Stressful Events and Satisfaction with Spouse Support Behaviors.” Communication Research19:154–74.
12.
DasRanjanaHodkinsonPaul. 2020. “Affective Coding: Strategies of Online Steganography in Fathers’ Mental Health Disclosure.” New Media & Society22:752–769.
13.
de BeauvoirSimone. 1961. The Second Sex. New York: Vintage Books.
14.
DubrofskyRachel. 2007. “Therapeutics of the Self: Surveillance in the Service of the Therapeutic.” Television & New Media8 (4): 263–84.
15.
ElliottLuther. 2004. “Goa Trance and the Practice of Community in the Age of the Internet.” Television & New Media5 (3): 272–88.
16.
EsareyAshleyXiaoQiang. 2011. “Digital Communication and Political Change in China.” International Journal of Communication5:298–319.
17.
FosterRoger. 2016. “Therapeutic Culture, Authenticity and Neo-liberalism.” History of the Human Sciences29 (1): 99–116.
18.
FriedanBetty. 1963. The Feminine Mystique. New York: W.W. Norton.
19.
FurediFrank. 2004. Therapy Culture: Cultivating Vulnerability in an Uncertain Age. London: Routledge.
20.
GreenhalghSusan. 2008. Just One Child: Science and Policy in Deng’s China. Oakland: University of California Press.
21.
HallWendyIrvineValerie. 2009. “E-communication among Mothers of Infants and Toddlers in a Community-based Cohort: A Content Analysis.” Journal of Advanced Nursing65 (1): 175–83.
22.
HertogEkaterina. 2009. Tough Choices: Bearing an Illegitimate Child in Japan. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
23.
hooksbell. 1981. Ain’t I a Woman? Black Women and Feminism. Boston: South End Press.
24.
HumphreysSalVeredKaren. 2014. “Reflecting on Gender and Digital Networked Media.” Television & New Media15 (1): 3–13.
25.
JongwilaiwanRattanaThompsonEric. 2013. “Thai Wives in Singapore and Transnational Patriarchy.” Gender, Place & Culture20 (3): 363–81.
26.
KandiyotiDeniz. 1988. “Bargaining with Patriarchy.” Gender & Society2 (3): 274–90.
27.
LanPei-Chia. 2000. “Bargaining with Patriarchy: Taiwanese Women Hiring Migrant Domestic Workers.” Anthropology of Work Review21 (3): 9–14.
28.
LimIn-Sook. 1997. “Korean Immigrant Women’s Challenge to Gender Inequality at Home: The Interplay of Economic Resources, Gender, and Family.” Gender & Society11 (1): 31–51.
29.
LuMeihuiXieJiayan. 2013. “Difficult Situation of Unmarried Mothers.” Journalist Observation8:57–59.
30.
McLeodJulieWrightKatie. 2009. “The Talking Cure in Everyday Life: Gender, Generations and Friendship.” Sociology40 (1): 122–39.
31.
PedersenSarahSmithsonJanet. 2013. “Mothers with Attitude—How the Mumsnet Parenting Forum Offers Space for New Forms of Femininity to Emerge Online.” Women’s Studies International Forum38:97–106.
32.
ReichStephanie. 2010. “Adolescents’ Sense of Community on Myspace and Facebook: A Mixed-methods Approach.” Journal of Community Psychology38 (6): 688–705.
33.
RieffPhilip. 1966. The Triumph of the Therapeutic: Uses of Faith after Freud. New York: Harper and Row.
34.
Sa’arAmalia. 2005. “Postcolonial Feminism, the Politics of Identification, and the Liberal Bargain.” Gender & Society19 (5): 680–700.
SunShuo. 2018. “A Judicial Solution and Judicial Adjudication to Parental Visitation Rights of Illegitimate Child.” Social Welfare (Theory)6:19–22.
37.
TønnessenLiv. 2010. “Is Islam a Threshold for Escape or an Insurmountable Barrier? Women Bargaining with Patriarchy in Post-Islamist Sudan.” Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East30 (3): 583–94.
38.
WaylenGeorgina. 1992. “Rethinking Women’s Political Participation and Protest: Chile 1970–1990.” Political Studies40 (2): 299–314.
39.
WrightKatie. 2008. “Theorizing Therapeutic Culture: Past Influences, Future Directions.” Journal of Sociology44 (4): 321–36.
40.
YangGuobin. 2013. The Power of the Internet in China: Citizen Activism Online. New York: Columbia University Press.
41.
YountKathryn. 2005. “The Patriarchal Bargain and Intergenerational Coresidence in Egypt.” The Sociological Quarterly46 (1): 137–64.
