This article argues that independent TV channels releasing narratives of intersecting identities innovate in the organization and technological dissemination of representations, specifying cultural production in ways that more fully value communities in the United States and at times abroad. Through interviews with founders of ten currently running and defunct independent channels, I show how the value of intersectionality is not simply in branding corporate channels or supplying them with new narratives but also in critiquing and reinventing industrial practices to accommodate communities historically excluded from the system. These indie channels allow scholars to see the work of development itself, chronically understudied despite its rapid expansion through net-neutral web distribution and its legacy as the process from which all TV shows emerge.
AslingerBen. 2009. “Creating a Network for Queer Audiences at Logo TV.”Popular Communication7 (2): 107–21.
3.
AufderheidePat. 1992. “Cable Television and the Public Interest.”Journal of Communication42 (1): 52–65.
4.
AufderheidePat. 1996. “Public Service Broadcasting in the United States.”Journal of Media Economics9 (1): 63–76.
5.
Banet-WeiserSarah. 2007. “The Nickelodeon Brand: Buying and Selling the Audience.” In Cable Visions Television beyond Broadcasting, edited by Banet-WeiserSarahChrisCynthiaFreitasAnthony, 234–54. New York: New York University Press.
6.
Banet-WeiserSarah. 2012. Authentictm: The Politics of Ambivalence in a Brand Culture. New York: New York University Press.
7.
Banet-WeiserSarah. 2018. Empowered: Popular Feminism and Popular Misogyny. Durham: Duke University Press.
8.
BeltránMary. 2009. Latina/o Stars in US Eyes: The Making and Meanings of Film and TV Stardom. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
9.
BourdieuPierre. 1996. On Television. New York: New Press.
10.
BoyleDeidre. 1997. Subject to Change: Guerrilla Television Revisited. London: Oxford University Press.
11.
BrockAndré. 2012. “From the Blackhand Side: Twitter as a Cultural Conversation.”Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media56 (4): 529–49.
12.
ChristianAymar J.2011. “Beyond Big Video: The Instability of Independent Distribution in a New Media Market.”Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies26 (1): 73–87.
13.
ChristianAymar J.2018. Open TV: Innovation beyond Hollywood and the Rise of Web Television. New York: New York University Press.
14.
ColemanRobin R. MeansCobbJasmine. 2007. “No Way of Seeing: Mainstreaming and Selling the Gaze of Homo-Thug Hip-Hop.”Popular Communication5 (2): 89–108.
15.
CollinsPatricia H.2000. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge.
16.
CrenshawKimberle. 1991. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color.”Stanford Law Review43 (6): 1241–99.
17.
CunninghamStuartCraigDavidSilverJon. 2016. “YouTube, Multichannel Networks and the Accelerated Evolution of the New Screen Ecology.”Convergence22 (4): 376–91.
18.
CurtinMichael. 2009. “Matrix media.” In Television Studies after TV: Understanding Television in the Post-broadcast Era. edited by TurnerGraemeTayJinna, 9–19. New York: Routledge.
19.
DávilaArlene. 2001. Latinos, Inc.: The Marketing and Making of a People. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
20.
FergusonRoderick. 2004. Aberrations in Black: Toward a Queer of Color Critique. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
21.
FreitasAnthony. 2007. “Gay Programming, Gay Publics: Public and Private Tensions in Lesbian and Gay Cable Channels.” In Cable Visions Television beyond Broadcasting, edited by Banet-WeiserSarahChrisCynthiaFreitasAnthony, 215–33. New York: New York University Press.
22.
FullerJennifer. 2010. “Branding Blackness on US Cable Television.”Media, Culture & Society32 (2): 285–305.
23.
GrayHerman. 2004. Watching Race: Television and the Struggle for Blackness. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
24.
HallStuart. 2001. “Foucault: Power, Knowledge and Discourse.” In Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader, edited by WetherellMargaretTaylorStephanieYatesSimeon J., 72–81. London: Sage.
25.
HendersonFelicia D.2011. “The Culture behind Closed Doors: Issues of Gender and Race in the Writers’ Room.”Cinema Journal50 (2): 145–52.
26.
HimbergJulia. 2014. “Multicasting: Lesbian Programming and the Changing Landscape of Cable TV.”Television and New Media15 (4): 289–304.
LopezLori. 2018. “ISAtv: YouTube and the Branding of Asian America.” In From Networks to Netflix: A Guide to Changing Channels, edited by JohnsonDerek, 255–63. New York: Routledge.
37.
MartinAlfred. 2015. “Scripting Black Gayness: Television Authorship in Black-cast Sitcoms.”Television & New Media16 (7): 648–63.
38.
McChesneyRobert W.1999. Rich Media, Poor Democracy: Communication Politics in Dubious Times. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
39.
McChesneyRobert W.2000. “So Much for the Magic of Technology and the Free Marker.” In The World Wide Web and Contemporary Cultural Theory: Magic, Metaphor, Power, edited by SwissThomasHermanAndrew, 5–35. New York: Routledge.
40.
McChesneyRobert W.2013. Digital Disconnect: How Capitalism Is Turning the Internet against Democracy. New York: The New Press.
41.
MercerKobena. 1993. “Dark and Lovely Too: Black Gay Men in Independent Film.” In Queer Looks: Perspectives on Lesbian and Gay Film and Video, edited by GeverMarthaParmarPratibhaGreysonJohn, 238–56. New York: Routledge.
42.
MooreCandace. 2013. “Distribution Is Queen: LGBTQ Media on Demand.”Cinema Journal53 (1): 137–44.
43.
MoragaCherríeAnzaldúaGloria E., eds. 2015. This Bridge Called My Back: Writings by Radical Women of Color. Albany: State University of New York Press.
44.
MullenMegan. 2002. “The Fall and Rise of Cable Narrowcasting.”Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies8 (1): 62–83.
45.
MuñozJosé E.1999. Disidentifications: Queers of Color and the Performance of Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
46.
NewmanMichaelLevineElana. 2012. Legitimating Television: Media Convergence and Cultural Status. New York: Columbia University Press.
47.
NgEve. 2013. “A ‘Post-gay’ Era? Media Gaystreaming, Homonormativity, and the Politics of LGBT Integration.”Communication, Culture & Critique6 (12): 258–83.
48.
OuelletteLaurieHayJames. 2008. Better Living through Reality TV: Television and Post-welfare Citizenship. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
SenderKatherine. 2004. “Neither Fish nor Fowl: Feminism, Desire, and the Lesbian Consumer Market.”Communication Review7 (4): 407–32.
52.
SenderKatherine. 2007. “Dualcasting: Bravo’s Gay Programming and the Quest for Women Audiences.” In Cable Visions Television beyond Broadcasting, edited by Banet-WeiserSarahChrisCynthiaFreitasAnthony, 302–18. New York: New York University Press.
53.
SenderKatherine. 2012. The Makeover: Reality Television and Reflexive Audiences. New York: New York University Press.
Smith-ShomadeBeretta E.2002. Shaded Lives: African-American Women and Television. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
56.
Smith-ShomadeBeretta E.2004. “Narrowcasting in the new world information order: A space for the audience?”Television & New Media5 (1): 69–81.
57.
Smith-ShomadeBeretta E.2008. Pimpin’ Ain’t Easy: Selling Black Entertainment Television. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
58.
StreeterThomas. 1987. “The cable fable revisited: Discourse, policy, and the making of cable television.”Critical Studies in Mass Communication4 (2): 174–200.
