Australia is a country firmly part of the Global North, yet geographically located in the Global South. This North-in-South divide plays out internally within Australia given its status as a British settler-colonial society which continues to perpetrate imperial and colonial practices vis-à-vis the Indigenous peoples and vis-à-vis Australia’s neighboring countries in the Asia-Pacific region. This article draws on and discusses five seminal examples forming a case study on Australia to examine big data practices through the lens of Southern Theory from a criminological perspective. We argue that Australia’s use of big data cements its status as a North-in-South environment where colonial domination is continued via modern technologies to effect enduring informational imperialism and digital colonialism. We conclude by outlining some promising ways in which data practices can be decolonized through Indigenous Data Sovereignty but acknowledge these are not currently the norm; so Australia’s digital colonialism/coloniality endures for the time being.
AntonDonald K.2014. “Timor Sea Treaty Arbitration: Timor-Leste Challenges Australian Espionage and Seizure of Documents.” American Society of International Law18 (6): 1–6.
5.
Australian Crime Commission. 2014. “The Final Report of the National Indigenous Intelligence Taskforce 2006-2014.” Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.
6.
BallDesmond. 2001. “Silent Witness: Australian Intelligence and East Timor.” The Pacific Review14 (1): 35–62.
7.
BarclayGlen St John. 1995. “Problems in Australian Foreign Policy, January–June 1995.” Australian Journal of Politics & History41 (3): 339–55.
8.
BerdaYael. 2013. “Managing Dangerous Populations: Colonial Legacies of Security and Surveillance.” Sociological Forum28 (3): 627–30.
9.
BrambleTom. 2015. “Australia: A Mid-level Imperialist in the Asia Pacific.” Historical Materialism23 (3): 65–110.
10.
BreviniBenedetta. 2017. “Metadata Law, Journalism and Resistance in Australia.” Media and Communication5 (1): 76–83.
11.
BriskmanLinda. 2013. “Technology, Control and Surveillance in Australia’s Immigration Detention Centres.” Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees29 (1): 9–19.
12.
BrowneSimone. 2015. Dark Matters: On the Surveillance of Blackness. Durham: Duke University Press.
13.
CalmaTom. 2009. “The Northern Territory Intervention—It’s Not Our Dream.” Law in Context27 (2): 14–41.
14.
CarringtonKerryHoggRussellSozzoMaximo. 2016. “Southern criminology.” British Journal of Criminology56 (1): 1–20.
15.
CasilliAntonio. 2017. “Digital Labor Studies Go Global: Toward a Digital Decolonial Turn.” International Journal of Communication11:3934–54.
Community Affairs References Committee. 2017. Senate Inquiry into the Design, Scope, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Contracts Awarded and Implementation Associated with the Better Management of the Social Welfare System Initiative. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
18.
ConnellRaewyn. 2007. Southern Theory: The Global Dynamics of Knowledge in Social Science. Crows Nest, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
19.
ConnellRaewyn. 2014. “Using Southern Theory: Decolonizing Social Thought in Theory, Research and Application.” Planning Theory13 (2): 210–23.
CoutinhoFrancisco PereiraGalaFrancisco. 2014. “David and Goliath Revisited: A Tale about the Timor-Leste/Australia Timor Sea Agreements.” Texas Journal of Oil, Gas, and Energy Law10 (2): 429–62.
22.
CowanAnna. 2013. “UNDRIP and the Intervention: Indigenous Self-determination, Participation, and Racial Discrimination in the Northern Territory of Australia.” Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal22 (2): 247–310.
23.
DalyAngela. 2016. “Digital Rights in Australia’s Asian Century: A Good Neighbour?” In The Good Life in Asia’s Digital 21st Century, edited by Digital Asia Hub, 128–38. Hong Kong: Digital Asia Hub.
24.
DalyAngela. 2017. “Privacy in Automation: An Appraisal of the Emerging Australian Approach.” Computer Law & Security Review33 (6): 836–46.
DeeMike. 2013. “Welfare Surveillance, Income Management and New Paternalism in Australia.” Surveillance & Society11 (3): 272–86.
27.
de ZwartMelissaHumphreysSalvan DisselBeatrix. 2014. “Surveillance, Big Data and Democracy: Lessons for Australia from the US and UK.” University of New South Wales Law Journal37 (2): 713–47.
28.
DicksonAndonea. 2015. “Distancing Asylum Seekers from the State: Australia’s Evolving Political Geography of Immigration and Border Control.” Australian Geographer46 (4): 437–54.
29.
FergusonAndrew. 2017. The Rise of Big Data Policing: Surveillance, Race, and the Future of Law Enforcement. New York: New York University Press.
30.
FredericksBronwyn. 2010. “Re-empowering Ourselves: Australian Aboriginal Women.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society35 (3): 546–50.
31.
GajjalaRadhikaBirzescuAnca. 2011. “Digital Imperialism through Online Social/Financial Networks.” Economic & Political Weekly46 (13): 95–102.
GallowayKate. 2017. “Big Data: A Case Study of Disruption and Government Power.” Alternative Law Journal42 (2): 89–95.
34.
GoldflamRussell. 2008. “Satellites, Citizens and Secrets: R v Law & Others.” Alternative Law Journal33 (2): 92–96.
35.
GruensteinJenna. 2008. “Australia’s Northern Territory National Emergency Response Act: Addressing Indigenous and Non-indigenous Inequities at the Expense of International Human Rights.” Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal17 (2): 467–95.
HeathMary. 2017. “Continuing the Cold War Tradition and Suppressing Contemporary Dissent.” Alternative Law Journal42 (4): 248–52.
38.
HeemsbergenLukeDalyAngela. 2017. “Leaking Boats and Borders: The Virtue of Surveilling Australia’s Refugee Population.” Surveillance & Society15 (3/4): 389–96.
39.
HendersonClaire. 2014. “Australia’s Treatment of Asylum Seekers: From Human Rights Violations to Crimes against Humanity.” Journal of International Criminal Justice12 (5): 1161–81.
40.
HenmanPaulMarstonGreg. 2008. “The Social Division of Welfare Surveillance.” Journal of Social Policy37 (2): 187–205.
41.
HillPaul Ronald. 1995. “Blackfellas and Whitefellas: Aboriginal Land Rights, the Mabo Decision, and the Meaning of Land.” Human Rights Quarterly17 (2): 303–22.
42.
International Court of Justice. 2014. Questions Relating to the Seizure and Detention of Certain Documents and Data (Timor-Leste v. Australia): Request for the Indication of Provisional Measures Order. The Hague: International Court of Justice. https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/156/156-20140303-ORD-01-00-EN.pdf.
43.
JandrićPetarKuzmanićAna. 2016. “Digital Postcolonialism.” IADIS International Journal on WWW/Internet13 (2): 34–51.
44.
JinDal Yong. 2015. Digital Platforms, Imperialism and Political Culture. London: Routledge.
45.
JohnstonAnnaLawsonAlan. 2000. “Settler Colonies.” In A Companion to Postcolonial Studies, edited by SchwarzHenryRaySangeeta, 360–76. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
KeenanSarah. 2017. “Smoke, Curtains and Mirrors: The Production of Race through Time and Title Registration.” Law and Critique28 (1): 87–108.
49.
KuehnKathleen. 2016. The Post-Snowden Era: Mass Surveillance and Privacy in New Zealand. Christchurch: Bridget Williams Books Texts.
50.
KukutaiTahuTaylorJohn. 2016. “Data Sovereignty for Indigenous Peoples: Current Practice and Future Needs.” In Indigenous Data Sovereignty: Towards an Agenda, edited by KukutaiTahuTaylorJohn, 1–23. Canberra: Australian National University Press.
51.
LeeMurray. 2018. “Crime and the Cyber Periphery: Criminological Theory Beyond Time and Space.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Criminology and the Global South, edited by CarringtonKerryHoggRussellScottJohnSozzoMaximo, 223–44. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
LovettRaymond. 2016. “Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Community Wellbeing: Identified Needs for Statistical Capacity.” In Indigenous Data Sovereignty: Towards an Agenda, edited by KukutaiTahuTaylorJohn, 213–32. Canberra: Australian National University Press.
54.
LumKristianIsaacWilliam. 2016. “To Predict and Serve?”Significance13 (5): 14–19.
55.
Maldonado-TorresNelson. 2007. “On the Coloniality of Being: Contributions to the Development of a Concept.” Cultural Studies21 (2/3): 240–70.
56.
MannMoniqueDalyAngelaWilsonMichaelSuzorNic. 2018. “The Limits of (Digital) Constitutionalism? Exploring the Privacy-security (Im)balance in Australia.” International Communication Gazette80 (4): 369–84.
57.
MannMoniqueSmithMarcus. 2017. “Automated Facial Recognition Technology: Recent Developments and Approaches to Oversight.” UNSW Law Journal40 (1): 121–45.
58.
MannMoniqueWarrenIan. 2018. “The Digital and Legal Divide: Silk Road, Transnational Online Policing and Southern Criminology.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Criminology and the Global South, edited by CarringtonKerryHoggRussellScottJohnSozzoMaximo, 245–60. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
59.
MbembeAchille. 2003. “Necropolitics.” Public Culture15 (1): 11–40
60.
MenonVijayalakshmi. 2018. “Timor-Leste Australia Maritime Boundary Treaty: Victory for Dili?” RSIS Commentaries, No. 055. Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
61.
MiddletonHannah. 2009. “The Campaign against US Military Bases in Australia.” In Ending War, Building Peace, edited by BlanchardLynda-AnnChanLeah, 121–35. Sydney: Sydney University Press.
Moreton-RobinsonAileen. 2015. The White Possessive: Property, Power and Indigenous Sovereignty. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
64.
MorseValerie, ed. 2010. The Day the Raids Came: Stories of Survival and Resistance to the State Terror Raids. Texas: Rebel Press.
65.
MuldoonPaulSchaapAndrew. 2012. “Aboriginal Sovereignty and the Politics of Reconciliation: The Constituent Power of the Aboriginal Embassy in Australia.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space30 (3): 534–50.
66.
NobleSafiya Umoja. 2017. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York: New York University Press.
67.
O’NeilAndrew. 2017. “Australia and the ‘Five Eyes’ Intelligence Network: The Perils of an Asymmetric Alliance.” Australian Journal of International Affairs71 (5): 529–43.
68.
PatmanRobertSouthgateLaura. 2015. “National Security and Surveillance: The Public Impact of the GCSB Amendment Bill and the Snowden Revelations in New Zealand.” Intelligence and National Security31 (6): 871–87.
69.
PoolIan. 2016. “Colonialism’s and Postcolonialism’s Fellow Traveller: The Collection, Use and Misuse of Data on Indigenous People.” In Indigenous Data Sovereignty: Towards an Agenda, edited by KukutaiTahuTaylorJohn, 57–77. Canberra: Australian National University Press.
70.
RajaramPrem Kumar. 2003. “‘Making Place’: The ‘Pacific Solution’ and Australian Emplacement in the Pacific and on Refugee Bodies.” Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography24 (3): 290–306.
71.
RennieEllieGoldenfeinJakeThomasJulian. 2017. “Internet Policy and Australia’s Northern Territory Intervention.” Internet Policy Review6 (1): 1–17.
72.
RubyFelicityGogginGerardKeaneJohn. 2017. “‘Comparative Silence’ Still?” Digital Journalism5 (3): 353–67.
73.
SaulBen. 2012. “Dark Justice: Australia’s Indefinite Detention of Refugees on Security Grounds under International Human Rights Law.” Melbourne Journal of International Law13 (2): 685–731.
74.
SentasVickiPandolfiniCamilla. 2017. Policing Young People in NSW: A Study of the Suspect Targeting Management Plan. A Report of the Youth Justice Coalition NSW. Sydney: Youth Justice Coalition NSW. http://www.yjc.org.au/resources/YJC-STMP-Report.pdf.
75.
SuzorNicolasPappalardoKylieMcIntoshNatalie. 2017. “The Passage of Australia’s Data Retention Regime: National Security, Human Rights, and Media Scrutiny.” Internet Policy Review6 (1): 1–16.
76.
TauriJuan MarcellusPorouNgati. 2014. “Criminal Justice as a Colonial Project in Contemporary Settler Colonialism.” African Journal of Criminology and Justice Studies8 (1): 20–37.
ThatcherJimO’SullivanDavidMahmoudiDillon. 2016. “Data Colonialism through Accumulation by Dispossession: New Metaphors for Daily Data.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space34 (6): 990–1006.
80.
VeraciniLorenzo. 2010. Settler-Colonialism: A Theoretical Overview. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
81.
WatsonIrene, ed. 2018. “First Nations, Indigenous Peoples: Our Laws Have Always Been Here.” In Indigenous Peoples as Subjects of International Law, 96–119. Oxon: Routledge.
82.
WatsonJini Kim. 2015. “From Pacific Way to Pacific Solution: Sovereignty and Dependence in Oceanic Literature.” Australian Humanities Review58:29–49.
83.
WhiteRob. 2015. “Indigenous Young People and Hyperincarceration in Australia.” Youth Justice15 (3): 256–70.
84.
WilliamsGeorgeReynoldsDaniel. 2017. A Charter of Rights for Australia. Sydney: NewSouth Publishing.
85.
WilsonJon E.2007. “Early Colonial India beyond Empire.” The Historical Journal50 (4): 951–70.
86.
YapMandyYuEunice. 2016. “Data Sovereignty for the Yawuru in Western Australia.” In Indigenous Data Sovereignty: Towards an Agenda, edited by KukutaiTahuTaylorJohn, 233–52. Canberra: Australian National University Press.
87.
Agreement between the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia and the Government of the United States of America relating to the Establishment of a Joint Defence Space Research Facility [Pine Gap, NT], U.S.-AUS., December9, 1966, ATS 17.
88.
United Nations Law of the Sea Convention (UNCLOS), December10, 1982, U.N.T.S.,1982.
89.
Treaty with the Government of the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste on Certain Maritime Arrangements in the Timor Sea (CMATS Treaty), January12, 2006.
90.
UKUSA Agreement, U.S.-U.K., March5, 1947.
91.
Defence Special Undertakings Act1952 (Cth).
92.
Northern Territory National Emergency Response Act2007 (Cth).
