We are often told that data are the new oil. But unlike oil, data are not a substance found in nature. It must be appropriated. The capture and processing of social data unfolds through a process we call data relations, which ensures the “natural” conversion of daily life into a data stream. The result is nothing less than a new social order, based on continuous tracking, and offering unprecedented new opportunities for social discrimination and behavioral influence. We propose that this process is best understood through the history of colonialism. Thus, data relations enact a new form of data colonialism, normalizing the exploitation of human beings through data, just as historic colonialism appropriated territory and resources and ruled subjects for profit. Data colonialism paves the way for a new stage of capitalism whose outlines we only glimpse: the capitalization of life without limit.
AgambenGiorgio. 1998. Homo Sacer. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
2.
AlaimoCristinaKallinikosJannis. 2016. “Computing the Everyday: Social Media as Data Platforms.” The Information Society33 (4): 175–91.
3.
AroraPayal. 2016. “The Bottom of the Data Pyramid: Big Data and the Global South.” International Journal of Communication10:1681–99.
4.
ArvidssonAdam. 2016. “Facebook and Finance: On the Social Logic of the Derivative.” Theory Culture & Society33 (6): 3–23.
5.
BucherTaina. 2017. “The Algorithmic Imaginary: Exploring the Ordinary Affects of Facebook Algorithms.” Information Communication & Society20 (1): 30–44.
6.
CohenJulie E.2016. “The Surveillance–Innovation Complex: The Irony of the Participatory Turn.” In Participatory Condition, edited by BarneyDarinColemanGabriellaRossChristineSterneJonathanTembeckTamar, 207–26. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
7.
CohenJulie E.2018. “The Biopolitical Public Domain: The Legal Construction of the Surveillance Economy.” Philosophy & Technology31 (2): 213–33. doi:10.1007/s13347-017-0258-2
8.
CowenDeborah. 2014. The Deadly Life of Logistics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
9.
DavenportThomas. 2014. Big Data @ Work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
10.
de las CasasBartolomé. 1951. Historia de Las Indias [History of the Indies]. Vol. 3. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Economica.
11.
DusselEnrique. 1985. Philosophy of Liberation. Translated by MartinezAquilinaMorkovskyChristine. Eugene: Wipf and Stock.
12.
EubanksVirginia. 2018. Automating Inequality. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
13.
FuchsChristian. 2017. Digital Labour and Karl Marx. London: Routledge.
14.
ChristianFuchsMoscoVincent, ed. 2017. Marx in the Age of Digital Capitalism. Leiden: Brill.
15.
GerlitzCarolinHelmondAnne. 2013. “The Like Economy: Social Buttons and the Data-intensive Web.” New Media & Society15 (8): 1348–65.
16.
GillRosalindPrattAndy. 2008. “In the Social Factory? Immaterial Labor, Precariousness and Cultural Work.” Theory Culture & Society25 (7-8): 1–30.
17.
GillespieTarleton. 2010. “The Politics of “Platforms.” New Media & Society12 (3): 347–64.
18.
GitelmanLisa, ed. 2013. “Raw Data” Is an Oxymoron. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19.
GreeneDaniel MarcusJosephDaniel. 2015. “The Digital Spatial Fix.” Triple C13 (2): 223–47.
20.
HaggertyKevinEricsonRichard. 2000. “The Surveillant Assemblage.” British Journal of Sociology51 (4): 605–22.
21.
HardtMichaelNegriAntonio. 2017. Assembly. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
HarveyDavid. 2004. “The ‘New’ Imperialism: Accumulation by Dispossession.” Socialist Register40:63–87.
23.
KitchinRobDodgeMartin. 2011. Code/Space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24.
LazzaratoMaurizio. 2014. Signs and Machines: Capitalism and the Production of Subjectivity. Translated by Joshua DavidJordan. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25.
LevyKaren. 2015. “The Contexts of Control: Information, Power, and Truck-driving Work.” The Information Society31 (2): 160–74.
26.
MarazziChristian. 2008. Capital and Language: From the New Economy to the War Economy. Translated by GregoryConti. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27.
MarxKarl. 1976. Capital, Volume I. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
28.
Mayer-SchonbergerViktorCukierKenneth. 2013. Big Data. London: John Murray.
29.
MezzadraSandroBrettNeilson. “On the Multiple Frontiers of Extraction: Excavating Contemporary Capitalism.” Cultural Studies31(2–3): 185–204.
30.
MilanStefaniaTreréEmiliano. 2019. “Big Data from the South(s): Beyond Data Universalism.” Television & New Media20(4): 319–35.
31.
MooreJason W.2015. Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital. New York: Verso.
32.
NegriAntonio. 1989. The Politics of Subversion: A Manifesto for the Twenty-first Century. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
33.
O’NeilCathy. 2016. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. London: Allen Lane.
34.
PostoneMoishe. 1998. “Rethinking Marx (in a Post-Marxist World).” In Reclaiming the Sociological Classics, edited by CamicCharles. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
35.
QuijanoAníbal. 2007. “Coloniality and Modernity/Rationality.” Cultural Studies21 (2-3): 168–78.
36.
RiederBernhardSireGuillaume. 2014. “Conflicts of Interest and Incentives to Bias: A Microeconomic Critique of Google’s Tangled Position on the Web.” New Media & Society16 (2): 195–211.
37.
RossAndrew. 2013. “In Search of the Lost Paycheck.” In Digital Labor: The Internet as Playground and Factory, edited by ScholzTrebor, 14–32. New York: Routledge.
38.
SchneierBruce. 2015. Data and Goliath. New York: W.W. Norton.
39.
ScholzTrebor, ed. 2013. Digital Labor: The Internet as Playground and Factory. Routledge: New York.
40.
SenAmartya. 2002. Rationality and Freedom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
ShepherdTamara.2015. “Mapped, Measured, and Mined: The Social Graph and Colonial Visuality.” Social Media & Society1 (1). doi:10.1177/2056305115578671
42.
SmytheDallas W.1977. “Communications: Blindspot of Western Marxism.” Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory1 (3): 1–27.
TerranovaTiziana. 2000. “Free Labor: Producing Culture for the Digital Economy.” Social Text18 (2): 63–88.
45.
ThatcherJimO’SullivanDavidMahmoudiDillon. 2016. “Data Colonialism through Accumulation by Dispossession: New Metaphors for Daily Data.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space34 (6): 990–1006.
46.
TrontiMario. 1966. Operai E Capitale. Turin: Einaudi.
ZuboffShoshana. 2015. “Big Other: Surveillance Capitalism and the Prospects of an Information Civilization.” Journal of Information Technology30 (1): 75–89.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
