This article focuses on the impact of global television formats on local (nonformat) homegrown shows and examines how formats reshape industrial–cultural conventions for local productions. Empirically, the article looks at how (Indian) Idol rewrites cultural values, assumptions, and norms for nonfictional entertainment, particularly music talent shows in India. Using a production studies approach, analysis zooms in on production negotiations—the strategies and goals of the Idol format, specific calculations targeting Indian market, and how rival, homegrown shows review and revise (or reject) a format’s appeals. By investigating how producers from local nonformat shows such as Saregamapa (discussed further in the article) deliberate and rewrite their productions to challenge and overcome Idol’s allure while also adopting Idol’s features, this article argues that format copying is a coping mechanism, which reveals the tactical, creative, and cultural responses to the power of global media capital and not creative lethargy or mere copycatting.
BourdonJerome. 2012. “From Discrete Adaptations to Hard Copies: The Rise of Formats in European Television.” In Global Television Formats: Understanding Television across Borders, edited by OrenTashaShahafSharon, 111–127. New York: Routledge.
2.
CaldwellJohn T.2006. “Critical Industrial Practices: Branding, Repurposing, and the Migratory Patterns of Industrial Texts.”Television & New Media7 (2): 99–134.
3.
CavesRichard E.2000. Creative Industries: Contracts between Art and Commerce. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
HolmesSu. 2004. “‘Reality Goes Pop!’ Reality TV, Popular Music and Narratives of Stardom in Pop Idol.”Television & New Media5 (2): 147–72.
12.
HoltJenniferPerrenAlisa. 2009. “Introduction: Does the World Really Need One More Field of Study?” In Media Industries: History, Theory, and Method, edited by HoltJenniferPerrenAlisa, 1–2. Wiley-Blackwell.
KeaneMichaelMoranAlbert. 2008. “Television’s New Engines.”Television & New Media9 (2): 155–69.
16.
KjusY.2009. “Idolizing and Monetizing the Public: The Production of Celebrities and Fans, Representatives and Citizens in Reality TV.”International Journal of Communication2:277–300.
17.
MehtaNalin. 2008. India on Television: How Satellite News Channels Have Changed the Way We Think and Act. New Delhi: HarperCollins and India Today Group.
18.
NavarroVinicius. 2012. “More than Copycat Television: Format Adaptation as Performance.” In Global Television Formats: Understanding Television across Borders, edited by OrenTashaShahafSharon, 23–38. New York: Routledge.
OrenTashaShahafSharon. 2012. Global Television Formats: Understanding Television across Borders. New York: Routledge.
21.
PunathambekarAswin. 2010. “Reality TV and Participatory Culture in India.”Popular Communication8:241–55.
22.
PunathambekarAswin. 2013. From Bombay to Bollywood: The Making of a Global Media Industry. New York: New York University Press.
23.
RaiMugdhaCottleSimon. 2007. “Global Mediations: On the Changing Ecology of Satellite Television News.”Global Media and Communications3 (1): 51–78.
24.
RajagopalArvind. 1999. “Thinking through Emerging Markets: Brand Logics and the Cultural Forms of Political Society in India.”Social Text60:131–49.
25.
RoySrirupa. 2011. “Television News and Democratic Change in India.”Media, Culture & Society33 (5): 761–77.
26.
SenBiswarup. 2012. “Idol Worship: Ethnicity and Difference in Global Television.” In Global Television Formats: Understanding Television across Borders, edited by OrenTashaShahafSharon, 203–22. New York: Routledge.
27.
SinghalArvindObregonRaphaelRogersEverett M.1994. “Reconstructing the Story of Simplemente Maria, the Most Popular Telenovela in Latin America of All Time.”Gazette54:1–15.
28.
ThussuDaya K.2007. “The ‘Murdochization’ of News? The Case of Star TV in India.”Media, Culture & Society29 (4): 593–611.
29.
WaisbordSilvio. 2004. “McTV: Understanding the Global Popularity of Television Formats.”Television & New Media5 (4): 359–83.
