This article traces the discourses surrounding home video-recording technologies, from their emergence in the mid-1960s to their popularity in the mid-1990s. Through an analysis of newspapers, magazines, and advertisements, this article contends that video’s history has been shaped by two seemingly opposed visions of the medium: one which embraced it as a tool for intimacy, and another that condemned it as a harbinger of spectacle. Ultimately, I argue that these two seemingly contradictory views actually share similar convictions and emerge in response to crises and conditions of American capitalism. In their attempt to grapple with video, they condemn commercial television, defend a nostalgic vision of home and family, and in so doing reveal the instability of intimacy and persistence of spectacle at the heart of American domestic life.
BaudrillardJean. 1994. Simulacra and Simulation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
3.
BerlantLauren Gail. 1997. The Queen of America Goes to Washington City: Essays on Sex and Citizenship. Durham: Duke University Press.
4.
BerlantLauren Gail. 1998. “Intimacy: A Special Issue.” Critical Inquiry24 (2): 281–88.
5.
BoyleDeirdre. 1997. Subject to Change: Guerrilla Television Revisited. New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
CeroneDaniel. 1990. “The Candid Camcorder.” Los Angles Times, February14, sec. F, 1, 12.
7.
ChalfenRichard. 1987. Snapshot Versions of Life. Bowling Green: Bowling Green State University Popular Press.
8.
CoopersmithJonathan. 1998. “Pornography, Technology, and Progress.” ICON4:94–125.
9.
DawsonMax. 2007. “Home Video and the ‘TV Problem’: Cultural Critics and Technological Change.” Technology and Culture48 (3): 524–49. doi:10.1353/tech.2007.0103.
10.
DebordGuy. 2000. Society of the Spectacle. Detroit: Black & Red.
11.
DeNikeLisa. 1982. “Home Movies: Videotaping a Family’s Cherished Memories.” The Baltimore Sun, November18, sec. E, 2.
12.
DwyerMichael D.2015. Back to the Fifties: Nostalgia, Hollywood Film, and Popular Music of the Seventies and Eighties. New York: Oxford University Press.
13.
EnsanianArmand. 1989. “How to Make Better Home Videos.” Popular Mechanics, July, 101–117.
14.
FeuerJane. 1995. Seeing through the Eighties: Television and Reaganism. Durham: Duke University Press.
15.
FlemingNigel. 1980. “The Great Videosex Explosion.” Adam Film World, March, 1–5.
16.
FrippBill. 1980. “Bringing the Family Tree to Life on Videotape.” The Boston Globe, July22, 1, 9.
17.
GoodmanEllen. 1988. “The Abosule Mania for Recording Our Lives.” The Washington Post, May24, sec. A, 23.
18.
GranberryMike. 1985. “Family Memories Preserved on Videotape.” Los Angles Times, November28, sec. E, 1, 20.
19.
GurneyDavid. 2011. “Recombinant Comedy, Transmedial Mobility, and Viral Video.” The Velvet Light Trap68 (July): 3–13. doi:10.1353/vlt.2011.0018.
20.
HallKimberly. 2016. “Selfies and Self-writing: Cue Card Confessions as Social Media Technologies of the Self.” Television & New Media17 (3): 228–42. doi:10.1177/1527476415591221.
21.
HalleckDeeDee. 2002. Hand-held Visions: The Impossible Possibilities of Community Media. New York: Fordham University Press.
22.
HawkinsWilliams J.1980. “Save the Action with Color Video Cameras.” Popular Science, November, 96–99.
23.
HensonPat. 1990. “Sex, Lives and Videotape.” Videomaker Magazine, October, 46–47.
24.
HessAaron. 2015. “The Selfie Assemblage.” International Journal of Communication9:18.
25.
HilderbrandLucas. 2009. Inherent Vice: Bootleg Histories of Videotape and Copyright. Durham: Duke University Press.
ImmermanJune. 1988. “Family Saga Moves into Video Age.” The New York Times, February7, sec. WC, 11.
28.
IsenbergBarbara. 1982. “Second Chance at Life.” Los Angeles Times, October24, sec. L, 2.
29.
JacobsonMax. 1990. “Inside ‘America’s Funniest Home Videos.’”Chicago Tribune, March30, sec. CN, 1–2.
30.
KlingerBarbara. 2006. Beyond the Multiplex: Cinema, New Technologies, and the Home. Berkeley: University of California Press.
31.
LarsenDave. 1980. “More Tangible than Memories: Videotaping of Private Thoughts.” Los Angles Times, November10, sec. F, 1, 7.
32.
McCarthyAnna. 2001. Ambient Television: Visual Culture and Public Space. Console-ing Passions. Durham: Duke University Press.
33.
MoranJames M.2002. There’s No Place like Home Video. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
34.
NewmanMichael Z.2014. Video Revolutions: On the History of a Medium. New York: Columbia University Press.
35.
OuelletteLaurie J.1995. “Camcorder Dos and Don’ts: Popular Discourses on Amateur Video and Participatory Television.” The Velvet Light Trap36:33–44.
36.
RaphaelChad. 2004. “The Political Economic Origins of Reali-TV.” In Reality TV: Remaking Television Culture, edited by MurraySusanOuelletteLaurie J., 123–40. New York: New York University Press.
37.
RoseGillian. 2010. Doing Family Photography: The Domestic, the Public, and the Politics of Sentiment. Burlington: Ashgate.
38.
RosenbergHoward. 1990. “America’s UNfunniest Home Videos.” Los Angles Times, April9, sec. F, 1, 12.
SpigelLynn. 1992. Make Room for TV: Television and the Family Ideal in Postwar America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44.
The New York Times. 1991. “Video Vacations.” August29, sec. A, 28.
45.
“The 1980s: A Reference Guide to Motion Pictures, Television, VCR and Cable.”1991. The Velvet Light Trap27:77–88.
46.
WarfieldKatie. 2017. “MirrorCameraRoom: The Gendered Multi-(in)Stabilities of the Selfie.” Feminist Media Studies17 (1): 77–92. doi:10.1080/14680777.2017.1261843.
47.
WasserFrederick. 2001. Veni, Vidi, Video: The Hollywood Empire and the VCR. Austin: University of Texas Press.
48.
ZimmermannPatricia Rodden. 1995. Reel Families: A Social History of Amateur Film. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
