Life360 is a surveillance app marketed to families that tracks and shares users’ location information in the name of child safety. Using this app as a case study, I examine how one Silicon Valley company promotes the idea that digital data are inherently objective and meaningful, specifically in the way they frame location information as necessary and sufficient for protecting children from harm. Apps like Life360 sell users a service that collects, repackages, and commodifies their personal information. These functions help fulfill the promise that Silicon Valley innovations developed for consumers can help solve social problems—in this case, that an app can help make children safer in public spaces. By closely analyzing the app itself and the texts produced by the company, this article finds that such technological solutions to risk both create and relieve a new anxiety about the need to know exactly where one’s family members are at all times.
BalsamoAnne Marie. 1996. “Myths of Information: The Cultural Impact of New Information Technologies.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management8 (3): 341–48.
BoesenJulieRodeJennifer A.ManciniClara. 2010. “The Domestic Panopticon: Location Tracking in Families.” Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, Copenhagen, September 26–29.
8.
boyddanahCrawfordKate. 2012. “Critical Questions for Big Data.” Information, Communication & Society15 (5): 662–79. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878.
de MontjoyeYves-AlexandreHidalgoCésar A.VerleysenMichelBlondelVincent D.2013. “Unique in the Crowd: The Privacy Bounds of Human Mobility.” Scientific Reports3:1376.
17.
DobsonJerome E.FisherPeter F.2003. “Geoslavery.” IEEE Technology and Society Magazine22 (1): 47–52.
18.
DubrofskyRachel E.MagnetShoshana Amielle, eds. 2015. Feminist Surveillance Studies. Durham: Duke University Press.
FoucaultMichel. 1995. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, 2nd Vintage Books ed. New York: Vintage Books.
21.
FoxJesseOsbornJeremy L.WarberKatie M.2014. “Relational Dialectics and Social Networking Sites: The Role of Facebook in Romantic Relationship Escalation, Maintenance, Conflict, and Dissolution.” Computers in Human Behavior35:527–34. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.031.
22.
GatesKelly. 2011. Our Biometric Future: Facial Recognition Technology and the Culture of Surveillance, Critical Cultural Communication. New York: New York University Press.
23.
GitelmanLisa. 2013. Raw Data Is an Oxymoron. Cambridge: MIT Press.
24.
GreggMelissa. 2014. “Adultery Technologies.” In Identity Technologies: Constructing the Self Online, edited by PolettiAnnaRakJulie, 99–111. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
25.
HallRachel. 2015. The Transparent Traveler: The Performance and Culture of Airport Security. Durham: Duke University Press.
26.
HillmanMayerAdamsJohnWhiteleggJohn. 1990. One False Move . . . : A Study of Children’s Independent Mobility. London, UK: Policy Studies Institute.
27.
KatzCindi. 2001. “The State Goes Home: Local Hyper-Vigilance of Children and the Global Retreat from Social Reproduction.” Social Justice28:47–56.
LuptonDeborah. 2016. “You Are Your Data: Self-Tracking Practices and Concepts of Data.” In Lifelogging: Digital self-tracking and Lifelogging - between disruptive technology and cultural transformation, edited by SelkeStefan, 61–79. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS.
30.
MagnetShoshana. 2011. When Biometrics Fail: Gender, Race, and the Technology of Identity. Durham: Duke University Press.
31.
MaloneKaren. 2007. “The Bubble-Wrap Generation: Children Growing up in Walled Gardens.” Environmental Education Research13 (4): 513–27.
32.
ManciniClaraRogersYvonneThomasKeerthiJoinsonAdam N.PriceBlaine A.BandaraArosha K.JedrzejczykLukaszNuseibehBashar. 2011. “In the Best Families: Tracking and Relationships.” Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, May 7–12.
33.
MarwickAlice E.2015. Status Update: Celebrity, Publicity, and Branding in the Social Media Age. New Haven: Yale University Press.
34.
MarxGarySteevesValerie. 2010. “From the Beginning: Children as Subjects and Agents of Surveillance.” Surveillance & Society7 (3/4): 192–230.
35.
MasonCorinne LysandraMagnetShoshana. 2012. “Surveillance Studies and Violence against Women.” Surveillance & Society10 (2): 105–118.
36.
MayerRobert N.2003. “Technology, Families, and Privacy: Can We Know Too Much about Our Loved Ones?”Journal of Consumer Policy26 (4): 419–39.
37.
MonahanTorin. 2010. Surveillance in the Time of Insecurity. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
38.
MuiseAmyChristofidesEmilyDesmaraisSerge. 2009. “More Information than You Ever Wanted: Does Facebook Bring Out the Green-Eyed Monster of Jealousy?”CyberPsychology & Behavior12 (4): 441–44.
39.
NeffGinaNafusDawn. 2016. Self-Tracking. Cambridge: MIT Press.
40.
NissenbaumHelen. 2004. “Privacy as Contextual Integrity.” Washington Law Review79:119–58.
41.
OostveenAnne-MarieVasalouAsiminaVan den BesselaarPeterBrownIan. 2014. “Child Location Tracking in the US and the UK: Same Technology, Different Social Implications.” Surveillance and Society12 (4): 581–93.
42.
RentschlerCarrie A.2003. “Designing Fear: How Environmental Security Protects Property at the Expense of People.” In Foucault, Cultural Studies, and Governmentality, edited by BratichJackPackerJeremyMcCarthyCameron, 243–72. Albany: State University of New York Press.
43.
SaukkoPaula. 2003. Doing Research in Cultural Studies: An Introduction to Classical and Newer Methodological Approaches, Introducing Qualitative Methods. London: Sage.
44.
ShadeLeslie Regan. 2011. “Surveilling the Girl via the Third and Networked Screen.” In Mediated Girlhoods: New Explorations of Girls’ Media Culture, edited by KearneyMary Celeste, 261–75. New York: Peter Lang.
45.
SimpsonBrian. 2014. “Tracking Children, Constructing Fear: GPS and the Manufacture of Family Safety.” Information & Communications Technology Law23 (3): 273–85.
46.
SouthworthCynthiaFinnJerryDawsonShawndellFraserCynthiaTuckerSarah. 2007. “Intimate Partner Violence, Technology, and Stalking.” Violence Against Women13 (8): 842–56.
TofteSarah. 2007. No Easy Answers: Sex Offender Laws in the US. New York: Human Rights Watch.
50.
TokunagaRobert S.2011. “Social Networking Site or Social Surveillance Site? Understanding the Use of Interpersonal Electronic Surveillance in Romantic Relationships.” Computers in Human Behavior27 (2): 705–13.
51.
TrottierDaniel. 2012. “Interpersonal Surveillance on Social Media.” Canadian Journal of Communication37 (2): 319–32.
Van DijckJosé. 2014. “Datafication, Dataism and Dataveillance: Big Data between Scientific Paradigm and Ideology.” Surveillance & Society12 (2): 197–208.
54.
VasalouAsiminaOostveenAnne-MarieJoinsonAdam N.2012. “A Case Study of Non-adoption: The Values of Location Tracking in the Family.” Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Seattle, February 11–15.
55.
WoodDavid MurakamiWilliamC.WebsterR.2009. “Living in Surveillance Societies: The Normalisation of Surveillance in Europe and the Threat of Britain’s Bad Example.” Journal of Contemporary European Research5 (2): 259–73.
