This article reflects on the growing urge among researchers to visualize large-scale digital data. It argues that the desire to visualize unfolds in the context of a complex entanglement of (1) the pragmatics of data visualization, (2) the problematic ideological work that visualizations do, (3) the politics of data power and neoliberalism, and (4) visualization pleasures. The article begins by outlining the considerations that constitute data visualization design, highlighting the complexity of the process. It then provides an overview of critical debates about the way that visualizations work, which are relevant to reflective visualization practice. Then, it turns to the context (of datafication and the neoliberalization of the university) in which academic researchers contemplate visualization futures and which simultaneously constrains the realization of these futures. Finally, the article acknowledges the cracks in these structures, the pleasure of visualizing data, for example, in using visualization for advocacy and social justice.
GageJohn. 2009. Colour and Culture: Practice and Meaning from Antiquity to Abstraction. London: Thames & Hudson.
12.
Gibson-GrahamJ. K.2006. A Postcapitalist Politics. London: University of Minnesota Press.
13.
GillRosalind. 2007. Technobohemians or the New Cybertariat? New Media Work in Amsterdam a Decade after the Web. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures.
14.
GillRosalind. 2009. “Breaking the Silence: The Hidden Injuries of Neo-liberal Academia.” In Secrecy and Silence in the Research Process: Feminist Reflections, edited by Ryan-FloodRoisinGillRosalind, 228–44. London: Routledge.
HallStuart. 1973. Encoding and Decoding in the Television Discourse Birmingham Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies. Birmingham: The University of Birmingham.
17.
HalpernOrit. 2014. Beautiful Data: A History of Vision and Reason since 1945. Durham: Duke University Press.
18.
HankeBobHearnAlison. 2012. “Out of the Ruins, the University to Come.” Topia28: 11-20.
19.
HarvieDavidDe AngelisMassimo. 2009. “‘Cognitive Capitalism’ and the Rat-race: How Capital Measures Immaterial Labour in British Universities.” Historical Materialism17 (3): 3–30.
20.
HesmondhalghDavidBakerSarah. 2010. Creative Labour: Media Work in Three Cultural Industries. London: Routledge.
21.
IraniLilly. 2015. “Hackathons and the Making of Entrepreneurial Citizenship.” Science, Technology & Human Values40 (5): 799–824.
22.
KennedyHelen. 2016. Post, Mine, Repeat: Social Media Data Mining Becomes Ordinary. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
23.
KennedyHelenAllenWilliam. 2016. “Data Visualisation as an Emerging Tool for Online Research.” In The Sage Handbook of Online Research Methods, edited by FieldingNigel G.LeeRaymond M.BlankGrant. London: Sage.
24.
KennedyHelenHillRosemaryAielloGiorgiaAllenWilliam. 2016. “The Work that Visualisation Conventions Do.” Information, Communication & Society19 (6): 715–35.
25.
KennedyHelenHillRosemaryAllenWilliamKirkAndy. Forthcoming. “(Big) Data Visualisations and Their Users: How Socio-cultural Factors Challenge Existing Definitions of Effectiveness.” First Monday.
26.
KennedyHelenPoellThomasvan DijckJose. 2015. “Data and Agency.” Big Data & Society2 (2). doi:10.1177/2053951715621569.
27.
KirkAndy. 2016. Data Visualisation: A Handbook for Data Driven Design. London: Sage.
28.
KressGuntherVan LeeuwenTheo. 2002. “Colour as a Semiotic Mode: Notes for a Grammar of Colour.” Visual Communication1 (3): 343–68.
29.
LynchKathleen. 2010. “Carelessness: A Hidden Doxa of Higher Education.” Arts and Humanities in Higher Education9 (1): 54–67.
30.
ManovichLev. 2011. “What Is Visualisation?”Visual Studies26 (1): 36–49.
31.
Mayer-SchönbergerViktorCukierKenneth. 2013. Big Data: A Revolution that Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
PorterTheodore M.1995. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Chichester: Princeton University Press.
34.
RoseNikolas. 1991. “Governing by Numbers: Figuring Out Democracy.” Accounting, Organizations and Society16 (7): 673–92.
35.
RossAndrew. 2004. No-collar: The Humane Workplace and Its Hidden Costs. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
36.
RuckensteinMinna. 2014. “Visualized and Interacted Life: Personal Analytics and Engagements with Data Doubles.” Societies4 (1): 68–84. doi:10.3390/soc4010068.
37.
RuppertEvelyn. 2014. “Visualising a Journal: Big Data and Society.” ICS Visual & Digital Cultures Research Seminar, Leeds, May 13.
38.
SavageMikeBurrowsRoger. 2007. “The Coming Crisis of Empirical Sociology.” Sociology45 (1): 885–900.
39.
SlaughterSheilaRhoadesGary. 2004. Academic Capitalism and the New Economy. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
ValarakisAlexandros. 2014. “On Data Visualization: Rhetoric and the Revival of the Body Politic.” Master’s thesis, University of Amsterdam.
44.
Van der VeldenLonneke. 2015. “Forensic Devices for Activism: Metadata Tracking and Public Proof.” Big Data & Society2 (2): 1–14.
45.
van DijckJosé. 2014. “Datafication, Dataism and Dataveillance: Big Data between Scientific Paradigm and Ideology.” Surveillance & Society12 (2): 197–208.
46.
van ZoonenLiesbet. 2014. “Data Delirium.” Sociologie Magazine22 (3): 10.
