Although abstinence-only programs in the United States have historically failed to provide medically accurate information on sexual health, young people in the twenty-first century have turned to YouTube to answer their sex questions. The accessible and engaging format of the YouTube video has helped some sex educators achieve Internet fame among a mass audience of users devoted to watching their web series and interacting with them on social media. Using two sex education channels (Laci Green’s Sex Plus and Lindsey Doe’s Sexplanations) as case studies, this article investigates the ways in which YouTube stardom shapes the production of and engagement with online sex education videos. In doing so, the article uncovers how Internet fame helps to create a brand of sex education salient to audiences across media platforms that rely on the illusion of face-to-face interaction, the development of an authoritative yet approachable identity, and the cultivation of a virtual community.
AshcraftCatherine. 2006. “‘Girl, You Better Go Get You a Condom’: Popular Culture and Teen Sexuality as Resources for Critical Multicultural Curriculum.”The Teachers College Record108 (10): 2145–86.
2.
BashfordAlisonStrangeCarolyn. 2004. “Public Pedagogy: Sex Education and Mass Communication in the Twentieth Century.”Journal of the History of Sexuality13 (1): 71–99.
3.
BishopRonald. 2003. “The World’s Nicest Grown-up: A Fantasy Theme Analysis of News Media Coverage of Fred Rogers.”Journal of Communication53 (1): 16–31.
4.
BoyntonPetra M.2007. “Advice for Sex Advisors: A Guide for ‘Agony Aunts,’ Relationship Therapists and Sex Educators Who Want to Work with the Media.”Sex Education: Sexuality, Society and Learning7 (3): 309–26.
5.
BurgessJeanGreenJoshua. 2009. YouTube: Online Video and Participatory Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.
6.
BurnsKelli S.2009. Celeb 2.0: How Social Media Foster Our Fascination with Popular Culture. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.
EberweinRobert. 1999. Sex Ed: Film, Video, and the Framework of Desire. Piscataway: Rutgers University Press.
9.
EllcessorElizabeth. 2012. “Tweeting @feliciaday: Online Social Media, Convergence, and Subcultural Stardom.”Cinema Journal51 (2): 46–66.
10.
EllsworthElizabeth. 2005. Places of Learning: Media, Architecture, Pedagogy. New York: Taylor & Francis.
11.
EscobarMariana LeytonKommersP. A. M.BeldadArdion. 2014. “Using Narratives as Tools for Channeling Participation in Online Communities.”Computers in Human Behavior37:64–72.
JenkinsHenryFordSamGreenJoshua. 2013. Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture. New York: New York University Press.
14.
KimGooyong. 2011. “Online Videos, Everyday Pedagogy, and Female Political Agency: ‘Learning from YouTube’ Revisited.”Global Media Journal11 (18): 1–16.
MarshallP. David. 2002. “The New Intertextual Commodity.” In The New Media Book, edited by HarriesDan, 69–82. London: British Film Institute.
18.
MarwickAliceboyddanah. 2011. “To See and Be Seen: Celebrity Practice on Twitter.”Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies17 (2): 139–58.
19.
“Meet Lindsey Doe!—Welcome to Sexplanations—1.” YouTube video, 4:49. Posted by “Sexplanations,”June10, 2013. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQiadPyjJ4E (accessed March 31, 2016).
OrgeronDevinOrgeronMarshaStreibleDan. 2012. Learning with the Lights off: Educational Film in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
PrybutokGayle. 2013. “YouTube: An Effective Web 2.0 Informing Channel for Health Education to Prevent STDs.”Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline16:19–36.
23.
SchaeferEric. 1999. Bold! Daring! Shocking! True: A History of Exploitation Films, 1919-1959. Durham: Duke University Press.
24.
SenftTheresa M.2008. Camgirls: Celebrity and Community in the Age of Social Networks. New York: Peter Lang.
25.
SenftTheresa M.2012. “Microcelebrity and the Branded Self.” In A Companion to New Media Dynamics, edited by BurgessJeanHartleyJohnBrunsAxel, 346–54. West Sussex: Blackwell.
