This article analyzes whether and to what extent public broadcasters have been able to transpose concepts like interaction, cocreation, and participation into actual media service delivery. The article theoretically frames this discussion, first, by defining and operationalizing interaction with, cocreation of, and participation in public service media (PSM), focusing mainly on participation, and, second, by analyzing the challenges that emerge from these concepts. Subsequently, a comparative case study analysis is conducted. Included in the analysis are three PSM multiplatform projects targeted at younger users: that is, TV Lab (France Télévisions), Carte Blanche (VRT, Flanders), and BNN University (NPO, the Netherlands). Findings are based on a qualitative document analysis and semistructured interviews with both producers of and participants in these multiplatform projects.
BakkerPiet. 2011. “Expectations, Experiences & Exceptions: Promises and Realities of Participation on Websites.” In Regaining the Initiative for PSM, edited by LoweGregorySteemersJeanette, 237–51. Göteberg: Nordicom.
2.
BakkerTom P.De VreeseClaes H.2011. “Good News for the Future? Young People, Internet Use and Political Participation.” Communication Research38 (4): 451–70.
3.
BardoelJod’HaenensLeen. 2008. “Reinventing PSB in Europe: Prospects, Promises and Problems.” Media, Culture & Society30 (3): 337–55.
BucyErikGregsonKimberly. 2001. “Media Participation: A Legitimizing Mechanism of Mass Democracy.” New Media & Society3 (3): 357–80.
10.
CarlssonU.2014. “PSM and the Young: Media Use and Challenges to Democracy from a Nordic Horizon.” Keynote speech given at EBU knowledge exchange, October5. http://tinyurl.com/lt9zq4b (accessed February 6, 2014).
11.
CarpentierNico. 2011. Media and Participation: A Site of Ideological-Democratic Struggle. Bristol: Intellect.
12.
CiminoFrancesca. 2014. “Youth and Media in Europe.” Presentation given at EBU knowledge exchange. October5. http://www3.ebu.ch/calendar/KX14 (accessed February 6, 2014).
13.
CoenegrachtMark. 2014. “OP12 kan jongeren niet boeien [Young people are not interested in OP12].” Het Laatste Nieuws, January31.
14.
CouldryNickLivingstoneSonjaMarkhamTim. 2010. Media Consumption and Public Engagement: Beyond the Presumption of Attention. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
15.
DahlgrenPeter. 2013. The Political Web: Media, Participation an Alternative Democracy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
16.
EBU. 2013. “Eurovision TV Lab Attract France 4 Winning Entry.” http://tinyurl.com/ncguule (accessed June 26, 2013).
17.
ElsteinDavid. 2008. “How to Fund Public Service Content in the Digital Age?” In The Price of Plurality: Choice, Diversity and Broadcasting Institutions in the Digital Age, edited by GardamTimLevyDavid, 86–90. Oxford: University of Oxford - Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
GlowackiMichal. 2014. “New Public + New Media = New Leadership?” In Public Media Management for the Twenty-first Century. Creativity, Innovation, and Interaction, edited by GlowackiMichalJacksonLizzie, 181–98. New York: Routledge.
23.
HallinDanielManciniPaolo. 2004. Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
HarrisAnitaWynJohannaYounesSelem. 2010. “Beyond Apathetic or Activist Youth: ‘Ordinary’ Young People and Contemporary Forms of Participation.” Young18 (1): 9–32.
25.
HarrisonJackie. 2009. “UGC and Gatekeeping at BBC Hub.” Journalism Studies11 (2): 243–56.
26.
HasebrinkUwe. 2011. “Giving the Audience a Voice: The Role of Research in Making Media Regulation More Responsive to the Needs of the Audience.” Journal of Information Policy1 (1): 321–36.
27.
HerzogChristianKarppinenKari. 2014. “Policy Streams and Public Service Media Funding Reforms in Germany and Finland.” European Journal of Communication29 (4): 416–32.
HumphreysPeter. 2012. “A Political Scientist’s Contribution to the Comparative Study of Media Systems in Europe: A Response to Hallin and Mancini.” In Trends in Communication Policy Research, edited by JustNataschaPuppisManuel, 157–77. Bristol: Intellect Books - ECREA.
30.
HutchinsonJonathon. 2012. “Extending the ABC’s Public Service Remit through ABC Pool.” Paper presented at RIPE, Sydney, September 5–6.
31.
IosofidisPetros. 2011. “The Public Sphere, Social Networks and PSM.”Information, Communication & Society14 (5): 619–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2010.514356 (accessed February 5, 2014).
32.
JacksonLizzie. 2014. “Participating Publics.” In Public Media Management for the Twenty-First Century. Creativity, Innovation, and Interaction, edited by GlowackiMichalJacksonLizzie, 234–51. New York: Routledge.
33.
JakubowiczKarol. 2010. “PSB 3.0: Reinventing European PSB.” In Reinventing Public Service Communication: European Broadcasters and Beyond, edited by IosifidisPetros, 9–22. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
34.
JakubowiczKarol. 2014. “Managing Spontaneity: UGC in the Media Ecology.” In Public Media Management for the Twenty-First Century. Creativity, Innovation, and Interaction, edited by GlowackiMichalJacksonLizzie, 216–34. New York: Routledge.
35.
KarlsenFaltinSundetVilde SchankeSyvertsenTrineYtrebergEspen. 2009. “Non-professional Activity on Television in a Time of Digitalisation. More Fun for the Elite or New Opportunities for Ordinary People?”Nordicom Review30 (1): 19–36.
36.
KarppinenKariMoeHallvard. 2012. “What We Talk about When We Talk About Document Analysis.” In Trends in Communication Policy Research, edited by JustNataschaPuppisManuel, 177–95. Bristol: Intellect Books - ECREA.
37.
KuhnRaymond. 2006. “The Third Age of Public Television in France.” Paper presented at RIPE, Amsterdam, November.
38.
LivingstoneSoniaBoberMagdalenaHelsperEllen. 2005. “Active Participation or Just More Information? Young People’s Take up of Opportunities to Act and Interact on the Internet.” Information, Communication and Society8 (3): 287–314.
39.
LoweGregory. 2008. The Role of PSM for Widening Individual Participation in European Democracy. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
40.
LoweGregory. 2009. “Why Public Participation in PSM Matters.” In The Public in PSM, edited by GregoryLowe, 9–37. Göteberg: Nordicom.
41.
MäntymäkiEeva. 2009. “Journalistic Authority Meets Public Participation, Re-Reith in the Age of Networks.” In The Public in PSM, edited by LoweGregory71–87. Göteberg: Nordicom.
42.
MeijerIrene Costera. 2009. “Quality Taste or Tasting Quality. Excellence in PSM from an Audience Perspective.” In The Public in PSM, edited by LoweGregory, 189–213. Göteberg: Nordicom.
43.
Ministère de la culture et de la communication. 2009. Cahier de Charges France Télévisions [Management contract France Télévisions].
44.
MurdockGraham. 2004. “Building the Digital Commons: Public Broadcasting in the Age of the Internet.” Paper Presented at the 2004 Spry Memorial Lecture, Vancouver, 18 November/Montreal, 22 November.
45.
NipJoyce. 2006. “Exploring the Second Phase of Public Journalism.” Journalism Studies7 (2): 212–36.
NPO. 2014. Meerjarenbegroting 2015-2019 [Strategic plan 2015-2019]. Hilversum: NPO.
48.
RamseyPhilip. 2013. “The Search for a Civic Commons Online: An Assessment of Existing BBC Online P.” Media, Culture & Society35 (7): 864–79.
49.
RoscoeJane. 2004. “Multiplatform Event Television: Reconceptualizing Our Relationship with Television.” The Communication Review7 (4): 363–69.
50.
ScannellPaddy. 2005. “The Meaning of Broadcasting in the Digital Era.” In Cultural Dilemmas in PSB, edited by JauertPerLoweGregory, 129-143. Göteberg: Nordicom.
51.
ShahDhavan V.ChoJaehoEvelandWilliam P.KwakNojin. 2005. “Information and Expression in a Digital Age: Modeling Internet Effects on Civic Participation.” Communication Research32 (5): 531–65.
SorensenInge Eybe. 2013. “Channels as Content Curators: Multiplatform Strategies for Documentary Film and Factual Content in British PSB.” European Journal of Communication29 (1): 34–49.
54.
SpigelmanJames. 2014. “Defining Public Value in the Age of Information Abundance.” In The Public in PSM, edited by LoweGregory, 43–56. Göteberg: Nordicom.
55.
SunsteinCass. 2001. Republic.com. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
56.
TempleMick. 2013. “Civic and Audience Empowerment: The Role of Citizen Journalism.” In The Media, Political Participation and Empowerment, edited by ScullionRichardGerodimosRomanJacksonDanielLillekerDarren, 233–49. London: Routledge.
57.
ThorsenEinar. 2013. “Routinisation of Audience Participation: BBC News Online, Citizenship and Democratic Debate.” In The Media, Political Participation and Empowerment, edited by ScullionRichardGerodimosRomanJacksonDanielLillekerDarren, 116–30. London: Routledge.
58.
Van den BulckHilde. 2008. “Can PSB Stake Its Claim in a Media World of Digital Convergence?”Convergence14 (3): 329–43.
59.
Van VelthovenStephanOudenMarjan Den. 2007. De kwaliteit en beleving van dagbladmerken [The Quality and Experience of Newspaper Brands]. Amsterdam: Veldkamp/Cebuco.
60.
VennessonPascal. 2008. “Case Studies and Process tracing.” In Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences, edited by PortaDonatella DellaKeatingMichael, 223–39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61.
Vlaams Parlement. 2013. “Schriftelijke vraag nr. 87 [Written question nr. 87].” http://tinyurl.com/mkpulws (accessed June 26, 2013).
62.
VRT Studiedienst. 2014. Ongepubliceerde kijk- en sociale media cijfers Carte Blanche [Unpublished television and social media ratings of Carte Blanche]. Brussels: VRT & Vlaamse Gemeenschap.
63.
VRT and Vlaamse Regering. 2001. Beheersovereenkomst tussen de VRT en de Vlaamse gemeenschap 2002-2006 [Management between VRT and the Flemish government 2002-2006]. Brussels: VRT & Vlaamse Gemeenschap.
64.
VRT and Vlaamse Regering. 2006. Beheersovereenkomst 2007–2011 tussen de VRT en de Vlaamse Gemeenschap [Management between VRT and the Flemish government 2007-2011]. Brussels: VRT & Vlaamse Gemeenschap.
65.
VRT and Vlaamse Regering. 2011. Beheersovereenkomst tussen de VRT en de Vlaamse gemeenschap 2012-2016 [Management between VRT and the Flemish government 2012-2016]. Brussels: VRT & Vlaamse Gemeenschap.
