This article deals with the streaming of online video, along a line of comparison to the music industry. Based on qualitative empirical research conducted in Sweden and other European countries, the article focuses on one particular aspect of streamed media, aggregation, since aggregation is central for how streaming is economically, technically, and socially organized. Developing its argument at the intersection of critical media industry studies and economic anthropology, the article argues that online aggregators have contributed to a process of devaluation that their services were designed to fight.
BakosYannisBrynjolfssonErik. 2000. “Bundling and Competition on the Internet.” Marketing Science19 (1): 63–82.
5.
BowkerGeoffrey C.2014. “The Theory/Data Thing.” International Journal of Communication8:1795–99.
6.
BraunJosh. 2014. “Transparent Intermediaries: Building the Infrastructures of Connected Viewing.” In Connected Viewing: Selling, Streaming, and Sharing Media in the Digital Era, edited by HoltJenniferSansonKevin, 124–43. New York: Routledge.
7.
BrookerWill. 2001. “Living on Dawson’s Creek: Teen Viewers, Cultural Convergence, and Television Overflow.” International Journal of Cultural Studies4 (4): 456–72.
8.
BurgessJeanPuschmannCornelius. 2014. “Metaphors of Big Data.” International Journal of Communication8:1690–709.
9.
CaldwellJohn. 2008. Production Culture: Industrial Reflexivity and Critical Practice in Film and Television. Durham: Duke University Press.
10.
CallonMichel. 1998. “An Essay on Framing and Overflowing: Economic Externalities Revisited by Sociology.” In The Laws of the Markets, edited by CallonMichel, 244–69. Oxford: Blackwell.
11.
ChamberlainDavid. 2010. “Television Interfaces.” Journal of Popular Film & Television38 (2): 84–8.
12.
Commission of the European Communities.2009. “Commission Staff Working Document: Impact Assessment.” SCO (2009) 893, Accompanying the Communication from the Commission on the Application of State Aid Rules to Public Service Broadcasting, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels.
13.
CullerJonathan. 1985. “Junk and Rubbish: A Semiotic Approach.” Diacritics15 (3): 2–12.
14.
DarwinCharles. 1875. Insectivorous Plants. London: John Murray.
ElberseAnita. 2008. “Should You Invest in the Long Tail?”Harvard Business Review86 (7–8): 88–96.
17.
ElberseAnita. 2014. Blockbusters: Hit-Making, Risk-Taking, and the Big Business of Entertainment. London: Faber & Faber.
18.
Federal Communications Commission. 2011. “Annual Assessment for the Status of Competition in the Market for the Delivery of Video Programming.” MB Docket No. 07–269, FCC11-65, April21.
19.
Federal Communications Commission. 2012. “Annual Assessment for the Status of Competition in the Market for the Delivery of Video Programming.” MB Docket No. 07–269, Fourteenth Report, FCC12-81, July20.
20.
GillespieTarleton. 2010. “The Politics of Platforms.” New Media & Society12 (3): 347–64.
21.
GillespieTarletonBoczkowskiPablo J.FootKirsten A., eds. 2014. Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
GreenbergJoshua. 2008. From Betamax to Blockbuster: Video Stores and the Invention of Movies on Video. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
24.
HallinanBlakeStriphasTed. 2014. “Recommended for You: The Netflix Prize and the Production of Algorithmic Culture,”New Media & Society. Published electronically June23. doi:10.1177/1461444814538646.
25.
HerbertDaniel. 2014. Videoland: Movie Culture at the American Video Store. Berkeley: University of California Press.
26.
HilderbrandLucas. 2009. Inherent Vice: Bootleg Histories of Videotape and Copyright. Durham: Duke University Press.
27.
HilmesMichele. 2013. Only Connect: A Cultural History of Broadcasting in the United States. 4th ed.Boston: Wadsworth.
28.
HoytEric. 2014. Hollywood Vault: Film Libraries before Home Video. Berkeley: University of California Press.
29.
IordanovaDina. 2012. “Digital Disruption: Technological Innovation and Global Film Circulation.” In Digital Disruption: Cinema Moves On-Line, edited by IordanovaDinaCunninghamStuart, 1–33. St Andrews: St Andrews Film Studies.
30.
ItoMimi. 2008. “Introduction.” In Networked Publics, edited by VarnelisKazys, 1–14. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
31.
JensenCasper BruunWinthereikBrit Ross. 2013. Monitoring Movements in Development Aid: Recursive Partnerships and Infrastructures. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
32.
JohanssonDaniel. 2013. “From Products to Consumption—Changes on the Swedish Music Market as a Result of Streaming Technologies.” Working Paper, Linnaeus University, Växjo, Sweden.
33.
KompareDerek. 2005. Rerun Nation: How Repeats Invented American Television. New York: Routledge.
34.
LangeAndré, ed. 2012. Yearbook, vol. 2: Television, Cinema, Video and On-Demand Audiovisual Services—The Pan-European Picture. Strasbourg: European Audiovisual Observatory.
MarxKarl. 1867. Das Kapital. Buch I: Der Produktionsprocess des Kapitals. Erster Band. Buch 1: Der Produktionsprocess des Kapitals [Capital. A Critique of Political Economy. Vol. 1, Book One: The Process of Production of Capital]. Hamburg, Germany: Meissner.
37.
McLuhanMarshall. 1962. The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
38.
ParksLisa. 2006. “Where the Cable Ends: Television in Fringe Areas.” In Cable Visions: Television Beyond Broadcasting, edited by Banet-WeiserSarahChrisCynthiaFreitasAnthony, 103–26. New York: New York University Press.
39.
PolanyiKarl. 1977. “The Economicist Fallacy.” Review1(1): 9–18.
40.
SampsonTony D.ParikkaJussi. 2009. “On Anomalous Objects of Digital Culture: An Introduction.” In The Spam Book: On Viruses, Porn, and Other Anomalies from the Dark Side of Digital Culture, edited by SampsonTony D.ParikkaJussi, 1–18. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
41.
SandvigChristian. 2010. “The Television Cannot Be Revolutionized.” Paper presented at the Berkman Center for Internet & SocietyBoston, MA, April 5.
42.
SanzEsteve. 2014. “On the Symbolic Production of Digital Markets for Cultural Goods.” Journal of Cultural Economy7 (2): 131–44.
43.
SchatzThomas. 2014. “HBO and Netflix: Getting Back to the Future.” Flow TV 19. flowtv.org (accessed May 15, 2014).
StarosielskiNicole. 2014. “Fiber Futures and the Aesthetics of Lag.” Paper presented at the SCMS Conference, Seattle, Washington, DC, March 19–23.
46.
SterneJonathan. 2012. MP3: The Meaning of a Format. Durham: Duke University Press.
47.
ThompsonMichael. 1979. Rubbish Theory: The Creation and Destruction of Value. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48.
TryonChuck. 2013. On-Demand Culture: Digital Delivery and the Future of Movies. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
49.
UlinJeffrey C.2013. The Business of Media Distribution: Monetizing Film, TV, Content in an Online World. 2nd ed.New York: Focal Press.
50.
UricchioWilliam. 2009. “The Future of the Medium Once Known as Television.” In The YouTube Reader, edited by SnickarsPelleVonderauPatrick, 360–75. Stockholm: National Library of Sweden.
VonderauPatrick. 2014. “Beyond Piracy: Understanding Digital Markets.” In Connected Viewing: Selling, Streaming, & Sharing Media in the Digital Era, edited by HoltJenniferSansonKevin, 99–123. New York: Routledge.
