On popular television, parenting narratives have emerged as a dominant representational paradigm in depicting lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) subjectivities as “normal.” However, I argue that the work of normalization in TV programs also operates on figures and relationships related to gay parents. I identify this secondary process as “anxious displacement” in which figures and relationships circulating around gay parents are overloaded with negatively codified social differences and symbolic excesses. This study examines the cultural work of anxious displacement in Modern Family and The New Normal by interrogating how racial excess, cultural capital, queerness, and the extreme are displaced onto characters in the gay parents’ immediate world. Ultimately, anxious displacement instantiates gay parenting as culturally intelligible and legitimate, and in doing so, reproduces potential normative liabilities by reinscribing hierarchies of personhood. At the same time, anxious displacement validates gay parenting, undermines homophobia, and affirms gay masculinities.
AllanJames. 2007. “And Baby Makes Three . . . Gay Men, Straight Women, and the Parental Imperative in Film and Television.” In Media/Queered, edited by BarnhurstKevin, 57–72. New York: Peter Lang.
2.
Avila-SaavedraGuillermo. 2009. “Nothing Queer about Queer Television: Televised Construction of Gay Masculinities.” Media, Culture & Society31 (1): 5–21.
3.
BattlesKathleenHilton-MorrowWendy. 2002. “Gay Characters in Conventional Spaces.” Critical Studies in Media Communication19 (1): 87–105.
4.
BeckerRon. 2006. Gay TV and Straight America. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
ButlerJudith. 2004. Undoing Gender. New York: Routledge.
8.
DerridaJacques. 1982. Margins of Philosophy. Translated by BassAlan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
DoranSteven E.2013. “Housebroken: Homodomesticity and the Normalization of Queerness in Modern Family.” In Queer Love in Film and Television: Critical Essays, edited by DemoryPamelaPullenChristopher, 95–104. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
10.
DotyAlexander. 1993. Making Things Perfectly Queer: Interpreting Mass Culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
11.
DowBonnie. 2001. “Ellen, Television, and the Politics of Gay and Lesbian Visibility.” Critical Studies in Media Communication18 (2): 123–40.
DugganLisa. 2003. The Twilight of Equality? Neoliberalism, Cultural Politics, and the Attack on Democracy. Boston: Beacon Press.
14.
FassinDidier. 2011. “Racialization: How to Do Races with Bodies.” In A Companion to the Anthropology of the Body and Embodiment, edited by Mascia-LeesFrances E., 419–34. Hoboken: Blackwell.
15.
FejesFred. 2000. “Making a Gay Masculinity.” Critical Studies in Media Communication17:113–6.
GrayHerman. 2005. Cultural Moves: African Americans and the Politics of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
20.
GrossLarry. 2001. Up from Invisibility: Lesbians, Gay Men and the Media in America. New York: Columbia University Press.
21.
HalberstamJudith. 2005. In a Queer Time and Place: Transgender Bodies, Subcultural Lives. New York: New York University Press.
22.
HalperinDavid. 1995. Saint Foucault: Towards a Gay Hagiography. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
Harris-PerryMelissa. 2011. Sister Citizen: Shame, Stereotypes and Black Women in America. New Haven: Yale University Press.
24.
HicksStephen. 2005. “Is Gay Parenting Bad for Kids? Responding to the ‘Very Idea of Difference’ in Research on Gay and Lesbian Parents.” Sexualities8:153–67.
25.
HicksStephen. 2006. “Genealogy’s Desire: Practices of Kinship amongst Lesbian and Gay Foster-Carers and Adopters.” British Journal of Social Work36:761–76.
26.
JamesonFredric. 1979. “Reification and Utopia in Mass Culture.” Social Text1:130–48.
SeidmanSteven. 2002. Beyond the Closet: The Transformation of Gay and Lesbian Life. New York: Routledge.
35.
SloopJohn M.2000. “Disciplining the Transgendered: Brandon Teena, Public Representation, and Normativity.” Western Journal of Communication64 (2): 165–89.
36.
SmithDorothy. 1993. “The Standard North American Family: SNAF as an Ideological Code.” Journal of Family Issues14 (1): 50–65.
