By drawing on eighty-nine qualitative interviews in which people account for their use of information and communication technology, this article analyzes how people negotiate their choices and principles in relation to prevalent discourses about proper and questionable conduct and content and whether old discourses are changing in the new media environment. Particular attention is paid to the way in which the cultural category of hobby is used as a speech repertoire that ennobles internet use. By describing their complementary use of different media and the meanings of different artifacts, informants are able to reverse default cultural hierarchies.
AbercrombieN.LonghurstB.1998. Audiences: A sociological theory of performance and imagination. London: Sage.
2.
AlasuutariP.1996. Television as a moral issue. In The construction of the viewer: Media ethnography and the anthropology of audiences, edited by CrawfordI.HafsteinssonS. B., 101–17. Höjberg, Denmark: Intervention Press.
3.
AlasuutariP., ed. 1999. Rethinking the media audience: The new agenda. London: Sage.
4.
AlasuutariP.2004. Social theory and human reality. London: Sage.
5.
AlasuutariP.2006. Is globalization undermining the sacred principles of modernity? In Questions of method in cultural studies, edited by WhiteM.SchwochJ., 221–40. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
6.
AndersonB.2002. The domestication of information and communication technologies. Colchester, UK: University of Essex.
7.
AndersonL.TaylorJ. D.2010. Standing out while fitting in: Serious leisure identities and aligning actions among skydivers and gun collectors. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography39 (1): 34–59.
8.
AndrejevicM.2008. Watching television without pity: The productivity of online fans. Television & New Media9 (1): 24–46.
9.
AngI.1991. Desperately seeking the audience. London: Routledge.
10.
BakardjievaM.2005. Internet society: The internet in everyday life. London: Sage.
11.
BaldwinC. K.NorrisP. A.1999. Exploring the dimensions of serious leisure: “Love me—love my dog!”Journal of Leisure Research31 (1): 1.
12.
BoothP.2010. Digital fandom: New media studies. New York: Peter Lang.
13.
BrownC. A.2007. The Carolina Shaggers: Dance as serious leisure. Journal of Leisure Research39 (4): 623–47.
14.
BurrV.2003. Social constructionism. 2nd ed.London: Routledge.
15.
ConsalvoM.2003. Zelda 64 and video game fans. Television & New Media4 (3): 321.
16.
CostelloV.MooreB.2007. Cultural outlaws: An examination of audience activity and online television fandom. Television & New Media8 (2): 124–43.
17.
CoverR.2006. Audience inter/active: Interactive media, narrative control and reconceiving audience history. New Media Society8 (1): 139–58.
18.
DeuzeM.2006. Ethnic media, community media and participatory culture. Journalism7 (3): 262–80.
19.
FontanaA.FreyJ. H.2000. The interview: From structured questions to negotiated text. In Handbook of qualitative research: Second edition, edited by DenzinN. K.LincolnY.S., 645–72. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
GelberS.1991. A job you can’t lose: Work and hobbies in the Great Depression. Journal of Social History24 (4): 741–66.
21.
GelberS.1997. Do-it-yourself: Constructing, repairing and maintaining domestic masculinity. American Quarterly49 (1): 66–112.
22.
GubriumJ. F.HolsteinJ. A.2002. From the individual interview to the interview society. In Handbook of interview research, edited by GubriumJ. F.HolsteinJ. A., 3–32. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
HaddonL.2007. Roger Silverstone’s legacies: Domestication. New Media & Society9 (1): 25–32.
24.
HarveyK.2000. Describing camp talk: Language/pragmatics/politics. Language and Literature9 (3): 240–60.
25.
HastingsD. W.KurthS. B.SchloderM.CyrD.1995. Reasons for participating in a serious leisure career: Comparison of Canadian and U.S. masters swimmers. International Review for the Sociology of Sport30 (1): 101–23.
26.
HillsM.2002. Fan cultures. London: Routledge.
27.
HolsteinJ. A.GubriumJ. F.1995. The active interview. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
HolsteinJ. A.GubriumJ. F.2008. Handbook of constructionist research. New York: Guilford Press.
29.
JenkinsH.1992. Textual poachers: Television fans & participatory culture. New York: Routledge.
30.
JenkinsH.2004. The cultural logic of media convergence. International Journal of Cultural Studies7 (1): 33–43.
31.
JenkinsH.2006. Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.
32.
JonesI.SymonG.2001. Lifelong learning as serious leisure: Policy, practice and potential. Leisure Studies20 (4): 269–83.
KleifT.FaulknerW.2003. “I’m no athlete [but] I can make this thing dance!”—Men’s pleasures in technology. Science, Technology & Human Values28 (2): 296.
35.
KurriK.WahlstromJ.2001. Dialogical management of morality in domestic violence counselling. Feminism & Psychology11 (2): 187–208.
36.
KurriK.WahlstromJ.2007. Reformulations of agentless talk in psychotherapy. Text & Talk27 (3): 315–38.
37.
LewisL. A.1992. The adoring audience: Fan culture and popular media. London: Routledge.
38.
LieM.SørensenK. H., eds. 1996. Making technology our own? Domesticating technology into everyday life. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
39.
LivingstoneS.2003. Children’s use of the internet: Reflections on the emerging research agenda. New Media Society5 (2): 147–66.
40.
LivingstoneS.2004. The challenge of changing audiences: Or, what is the audience researcher to do in the age of the internet?European Journal of Communication19 (1): 75–86.
41.
LonghurstB.2007. Cultural change and ordinary life. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
42.
LuomanenJ.2010. Living with the media: Analysing talk about information and communication technology. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
43.
McArthurJ. A.2009. Digital subculture: A geek meaning of style. Journal of Communication Inquiry33 (1): 58–70.
44.
MertonR.KingM. F.KendallP. L.1990. The focused interview: A manual of problems and procedures, 2nd ed.New York: Free Press.
45.
MillerT.YúdiceG.2002. Cultural policy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
MittellJ.2000. The cultural power of an anti-television metaphor: Questioning the “plug-in drug” and a TV-free America. Television New Media1 (2): 215–38.
47.
MorleyD.1986. Family television: Cultural power and domestic leisure. London: Comedia.
48.
NikunenK.2007. The intermedial practices of fandom. NORDICOM Review28 (2): 111–28.
49.
PangburnW.1922. The worker’s leisure and his individuality. The American Journal of Sociology27 (4): 433–41.
PeteriV.2006. Mediaksi kotiin: Tutkimus teknologioiden kotouttamisesta [Home by media: A study on domestication of media technologies]. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
52.
PetersonR. A.KernR. M.1996. Changing highbrow taste: From snob to omnivore. American Sociological Review61 (5): 900–7.
53.
PotterJ.1996. Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: Sage.
54.
PotterJ.WetherellM.1987. Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. Newbury Park: Sage.
55.
ReedL.2002. Governing (through) the internet: The discourse on pathological computer use as mobilized knowledge. European Journal of Cultural Studies5 (2): 131–53.
56.
RosenbergB. C.2011. The Our House DIY club: Amateurs, leisure knowledge and lifestyle media. International Journal of Cultural Studies14 (2): 173–90.
57.
RosenzweigR.1983. Eight hours for what we will: Workers and leisure in an industrial city, 1870-1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58.
SairinenR.2003. The politics of regulatory reform: “New” environmental policy instruments in Finland. Environmental Politics12 (1): 73.
59.
SanjekR.1991. The ethnographic present. Man26 (4): 609–28.
60.
SchlosbergD.RinfretS.2008. Ecological modernization, American style. Environmental Politics17 (2): 254–75.
61.
SilverstoneR.HirschE.MorleyD.1991. Listening to a long conversation: An ethnographic approach to the study of information and communication technologies in the home. Cultural Studies5 (2): 204.
62.
SimonB.2007. Geek chic: Machine aesthetics, digital gaming, and the cultural politics of the case mod. Games and Culture2 (3): 175–93.
63.
SontagS.1990. Notes on “camp.” In Against interpretation, and other essays, edited by SontagS., 275–92. New York: Picador.
64.
StebbinsR. A.1982. Serious leisure: A conceptual statement. The Pacific Sociological Review25 (2): 251–72.
