This article examines the globalization of the telenovela format in relation to issues of adaptation, proximities, and national identities. As a case study of glocalized telenovelas, it deals with the domestic adaptation of one of the most popular Latin American telenovelas, Yo soy Betty, la fea (1999-2001), into the “telenovelle” Sara (2007-2008), which takes place in a Belgian (more specifically Flemish) context. Therefore, this article specifically asks how Flemish identities are represented through the production process of Sara. While examining the international flow of telenovelas and the cross-cultural adaptation of the telenovela format, this case study considers an additional geopolitical and cultural context, as well as confronts and combines thematic textual analysis with expert interviews. Considering the successful export of “canned” telenovelas and the adaptation of this format within the framework of national identity and identification, this article deals with the emergence of the telenovelle as a local genre that is inspired by, and modifies, the original Latin American format.
Acosta-AlzuruC.2003. Tackling the issues: Meaning making in a telenovela. Popular Communication1 (4): 192-215.
2.
Acosta-AlzuruC.2004. Beauty queens, machistas and street children: The production and reception of socio-cultural issues in telenovelas. International Journal of Cultural Studies13 (2): 185-203.
3.
AdriaensF.2010. The glocalized telenovela as a space for identifications for diaspora girls in Flanders. An audience cum content analysis of Sara. OBS* Observatorio4 (4): 171-95.
4.
AkassK.McCabeJ.2007. Not so ugly: Local production, global franchise, discursive femininities, and the Ugly Betty phenomenon. Flow TV5 (7). www.flowtv.org.
5.
AllatsonP.2007. Key terms in Latino/a cultural and literacy studies. Oxford: Blackwell.
6.
AltmanR.2004. 95 theses about film genre. In Film/TV/genre, edited by BiltereystD.MeersP., 31-58. Ghent: Academia Press.
7.
AmayaH.2010. Citizenship, diversity, law and Ugly Betty. Media, Culture and Society32 (5): 801-17.
8.
AntolaL.RogersE. M.1984. Television flows in Latin America. Communication Research11 (2): 183-202.
9.
BarrieroP.2010. Understanding Ugly Betty: Negotiating race in a culturally-mixed text. Divergencias. Revista de Studios Linguisticos y Literarios8 (1): 34-40.
10.
BeedenA.De BruinJ.2010. The Office: Articulations of national identity in television format adaptation. Television & New Media11 (1): 3-19.
11.
BielbyD.HarringtonL.2005. Opening America? The telenovela-ization of U.S. soap operas. Television & New Media6 (4): 383-99.
12.
BilligM.1995. Banal nationalism. London: Sage.
13.
BiltereystD.1990. As telenovelas e o publico flamengo. Intercom: Revista Brasiliera de Comunicaçao13 (62-63): 81-95.
14.
BiltereystD.1991. Resisting American hegemony: A comparative analysis of the reception of domestic and US fiction. European Journal of Communication6 (4): 469-97.
15.
BiltereystD.MeersP.2000. The international telenovela debate and the contra-flow argument: A reappraisal. Media, Culture and Society22 (4): 392-413.
16.
CurranJ.MorleyD.2006. Media & cultural theory. London: Routledge.
17.
De CilliaR.ReisiglM.WodakR.1999. The discursive construction of national identities. Discourse and Society10: 149-73.
18.
DhoestA.2001. National identity as normality: Representation and typing in Flemish television fiction. Intersections: The Journal of Global Communications and Culture1 (2): 15-26.
19.
EspositoJ.2009. What does race have to do with Ugly Betty? An analysis of privilege and postracial representations on a television sitcom. Television & New Media10 (6): 521-35.
20.
GledhillC.1997. Gender and genre: The case of soap opera. In Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices, edited by HallS., 337-86. London: Open University Press.
21.
HallS.1996. Introduction: Who needs identity? In Questions of cultural identity, edited by HallS.Du GayP., 29-44. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
KraidyM.2002. Hybridity in cultural globalization. Communication Theory12 (3): 316-39.
23.
KraidyM.2005. Hybridity, or the cultural logic of globalization. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
24.
La PastinaA. C.2002. The sexual other in Brazilian television. International Journal of Cultural Studies5 (1): 83-99.
25.
La PastinaA. C.2004. Telenovela reception in rural Brazil: Gendered readings and sexual mores. Critical Studies in Media Communication21 (2): 162-81.
26.
La PastinaA. C.StraubhaarJ. D.2005. Multiple proximities between television genres and audiences. The schism between telenovelas’ global distribution and local consumption. Gazette: The International Journal of Communication Studies67 (3): 271-88.
27.
LopezA.1995. Our welcomed guests: Telenovelas in Latin America. In To be continued: Soap operas around the world, edited by AllenR. C., 256-75. London: Routledge.
28.
Martin-BarberoJ.2006. A Latin American perspective on communication/cultural mediation. Global Media and Communication2 (3): 279-97.
29.
McAnanyE.La PastinaA.1994. Telenovela audiences: A review and methodological critique of Latin American research. Communication Research21: 828-49.
30.
MatoD.2005. The transnationalization of the telenovela industry, territorial references, and the production of markets and representations of transnational identities. Television & New Media6 (4): 423-44.
31.
MayerV.2003. Living telenovelas/telenovelizing life: Mexican American girls’ identities and transnational telenovelas. Journal of Communication53 (4): 479-95.
32.
MayerV.BanksM. J.CaldwellJ. T., eds. 2009. Production studies: Cultural studies of media industries. New York: Routledge.
33.
MillerJ.2010. Ugly Betty goes global: Global networks of localized content in the telenovela industry. Global Media & Communication6 (2): 198-217.
34.
Molina-GuzmanI.2010. Globalizing television: Ugly Betty and the American dream. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Suntec Singapore International Convention & Exhibition Centre, Suntec City, Singapore, June 21, 2010.
35.
MoranA.2005. Global franchising, local customizing: The cultural economy of TV program formats. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies23 (2): 115-25.
36.
MoranA.2009a. New flows in global TV. Bristol: Intellect.
37.
MoranA., ed. 2009b. TV formats worldwide. Localizing global programs. Bristol: Intellect.
PortoM.2011. Telenovelas and representations of national identity in Brazil. Media, Culture & Society33 (1): 53-69.
40.
RiveroY.2003. The performance and reception of televisual “ugliness” in Yo soy Betty, la fea. Feminist Media Studies3 (1): 65-81.
41.
RobertsonR.1995. Globalization: Time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity. In Global modernities, edited by FeatherstoneM.LashS.RobertsonR., 25-44. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
SinclairJ.1999. Latin American television: A global view. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43.
SingerB.2001. Melodrama and modernity. New York: Columbia University Press.
44.
StamR.2000. Beyond fidelity: The dialogics of adaptation. In Film adaptation, edited by NaremoreJ., 54-76. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
45.
StavansI.2010. Telenovelas. Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood.
46.
StraubhaarJ.1991. Beyond media imperialism: Asymmetrical interdependence and cultural proximity. Critical Studies in Mass Communication8: 39-59.
47.
StraubhaarJ.2007. World television: From global to local. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48.
TufteT.2000. Living with the Rubbish Queen. Telenovelas, culture and modernity in Brazil. Luton: University of Luton Press.
49.
VinkN.1988. The telenovela and emancipation. A study on TV and social change in Brazil. Amsterdam: Royal Tropical Institute.
50.
WaisbordS.2004. McTV—Understanding the global popularity of television format. Television & New Media5 (4): 359-83.
51.
WaisbordS.JalfinS.2009. Imagining the national: Television gatekeepers and the adaptation of global franchises in Argentina. In TV formats worldwide, edited by MoranA., 55-78. Bristol: Intellect.
