This article examines the communicative structures of UK television news presentation and how these grant characteristic shape and form to today’s mainstream television news ecology. This communicative architecture remains generally underexplored and undertheorized and yet can be demonstrated to be representationally consequential in terms of how TV news programs variously open up and elaborate, or close down and delimit, opportunities for contending views and voices as well as the cultural display of difference. Based on a systematic analysis of mainstream UK television news, the study demonstrates how today’s UK news ecology is (1) communicatively structured, (2) professionally reproduced and differentiated, and (3) representationally consequential. The communicative architecture of television news, we argue, both naturalizes and conditions the public representations of news-mediated contention and consensus, and it does so through an established repertoire of analytical and affective communicative frames.
BarakGregg. 2007. Mediatizing law and order: Applying Cottle’s architecture of communicative frames to the social construction of crime and justice. Crime, Media, Culture3 (1): 101–9.
2.
BourdieuPierre. 1993. The field of cultural production: Essays on art and literature. New York: Columbia University Press.
3.
BourdieuPierre. 1998. On television. New York: The New Press.
4.
BourdieuPierre. 2005. The political field, the social science field, and the journalistic field. In Bourdieu and the journalistic field, ed. BensonRodneyNeveuErik, 29–47. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
5.
BensonRodney. 2006. News media as a “journalistic field”: What Bourdieu adds to New Institutionalism and vice versa. Political Communication23: 187–202.
6.
BensonRodneyNeveuErik. eds. 2005. Bourdieu and the journalistic field. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
7.
CottleSimon. 1993. TV news, urban conflict and the inner city. Leicester: Leicester University Press.
8.
CottleSimon. 2004. The racist murder of Stephen Lawrence: Media performance and public transformation. London: Praeger.
9.
CottleSimon. 2006a. Mediatized conflict: Developments in media and conflict studies. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
10.
CottleSimon. 2006b. Mediatizing the global war on terror: Television’s public eye. In Media, terrorism and theory, ed. KavooriAnandam P.FraleyTodd, 19–49. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
11.
CottleSimon. 2007. Ethnography and journalism: New(s) departures in the field. Sociology Compass, 1 (1): 1–16. www.sociology-compass.com (accessed 27th October 2010).
12.
CottleSimon. 2009. Global crisis reporting: Journalism in a global age. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
13.
CottleSimon. 2010. Global crises and world news ecology. In The Routledge companion to news and journalism, ed. AllanStuart, 473–84. London: Routledge.
14.
CottleSimon. 2011. Television agora and agoraphobia post-September 11. In Journalism post September 11, 2nd ed., ed. AllanStuartZelizerBarbie, 232–51. London: Routledge.
15.
CottleSimonRaiMugdha. 2006. Between display and deliberation: Analyzing TV news as communicative architecture. Media, Culture & Society, 28 (2): 163–89.
16.
CurranJames. 1998. Crisis of public communication: A reappraisal. In Media, ritual and identity, ed. LiebesTamarCurranJames, 175–202. London: Routledge.
17.
DeuzeMark. 2007. Media work. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
18.
DickinsonRoger.2008. Studying the sociology of journalists: The journalistic field and news world. Sociology Compass2 (5): 1383-99. www.sociology-compass.com (accessed 14th September 2010).
19.
EntmanRobert. 1993. Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication43 (4): 51–58.
20.
GaltungJohanRugeMarie. 1965. The structure of foreign news: The presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus crises in four newspapers. Journal of International Peace Research1: 64–90.
21.
GamsonWilliam. A.1989. News as framing. American Behavioral Scientist, 33: 157–61.
22.
GeertzClifford. 1973. The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
23.
GitlinTodd. 1980. The whole world is watching. Berkeley: University of California Press.
24.
HallStuartCritcherChasJeffersonTonyClarkeJohnRobertsBrian. 1978. Policing the crisis. London: Macmillan.
25.
HannerzUlf. 2002. Foreign news. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
HarcupTonyDeirdreO’Neill. 2001. What is news? Galtung and Ruge revisited. Journalism Studies2 (2): 261–80.
27.
HarrisonJackie. 2000. Terrestrial TV news in Britain. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
KitzingerJenny. 2000. Media templates: Patterns of association and the (re)construction of meaning over time. Media, Culture & Society22 (1): 61–84.
31.
Lee-WrightPeter. 2010. Culture shock: New media and organization change in the BBC. In New media, old news: Journalism and democracy in the digital age, ed. FentonNatalie, 71–86. London: Sage.
32.
MacGregorBrent. 1997. Live, direct and biased?London: Arnold.
33.
MatthewsJulian. 2010. Producing serious news for citizen children: A study of the BBC’s children’s program, Newsround. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen.
34.
McNairBrian. 2009. News and journalism in the UK. London: Routledge.
35.
McQuailDenis. 2005. Mass communication theory. London: Sage.
36.
NicholsBill. 1991. Representing reality: Issues and concepts in documentary. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
SchultzIda. 2007. The journalistic gut feeling: Journalistic doxa, news habitus and orthodox news values. Journalism Practice1 (2): 190–207.
39.
SparksColinTullochJohn, eds. 2000. Tabloid tales: Global debates over media standards. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
40.
TaylorCharles. 1994. Multiculturalism and the politics of recognition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41.
ThussuDaya K.2008. News as entertainment: The rise of global infotainment. London: Sage.
42.
TuchmanGaye. 1978. Making news: A case study in the social construction of reality. New York: Macmillan.
43.
Wahl-JorgensenKarin. 2010. News production, ethnography and power: On the challenges of news-centricity. In The anthropology of news and journalism, ed. BirdElizabeth, 21–34. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
