Visual critics interested in news primarily analyze still photographs in print media. Thus, the questions of how images in television news are contextualized, complemented, displaced, explained, or contradicted by the auditory channel and linguistic messages on the screen have not been studied extensively. Based on an exploratory content analysis of CNN, MSNBC, and FOX News coverage of the 9/11 terrorist attacks and Hurricane Katrina, the author categorizes the interplay between the three modes of information transmission in the broadcast news: moving footage (iconic messages), on-screen textual elements (linguistic messages), and voiceover (audio messages). The analysis identifies six organizing categories: (1) polysemy reduction, (2) meaning attainment through audio, (3) reinforcement, (4) contextualization and acquiring meaning, (5) contradiction, and (6) slogano-symbolism. These categories provide an interpretative framework for visual analyses of television news and offer new directions for research.
Becker, K.2003. Photojournalism and the tabloid press. In The photography reader, ed. L. Wells, 291-308. New York: Routledge.
6.
Berger, J.1980. About looking. New York: Pantheon .
7.
Braestrup, P.1977. Big story: How the American press and television reported and interpreted the crisis of Tet 1968 in Vietnam and Washington. Boulder, CO: Westview.
8.
Corner, J.1999. Critical ideas in television studies. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
9.
Craig, R.L.1999. Fact, public opinion and persuasion: The rise of the visual in journalism and advertising. In Picturing the past: Media, history, and photography, ed. B. Brennen and H. Hardt, 36-59. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
10.
Cross, S.2004. Visualizing madness: Mental illness and public representation . Television & New Media5: 197-216.
11.
Darling-Wolf, F.2004. Post-war Japan in photographs: Erasing the past and building the future in the Japan Times. Journalism5: 403-22.
12.
Edelman, M.1985. The symbolic uses of politics. Urbana : University of Illinois Press.
13.
Edwards, J.L., and C.K. Winkler.1997. Representative form and the visual ideograph: The Iwo Jima image in editorial cartoons. Quarterly Journal of Speech83: 289-310.
14.
Eldridge, J., ed. 1995. News content, language, and visuals. Vol. 1 of The Glasgow Media Group reader. New York: Routledge.
15.
El Refaie, E.2003. Understanding visual metaphor: The example of newspaper cartoons. Visual Communication2: 75-95.
16.
Ericson, R.V., P.M. Baranek, and J.B. Chan.1987. Visualizing deviance: A study of news organization. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
17.
Farhi, P.2001. The images that won’t let us go. Washington Post, September 15.
18.
Fiske, J.1986. Television: Polysemy and popularity. Critical Studies in Mass Communication3: 391-408.
19.
Gamson, W.1992. Talking politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Gans, H.1979. Deciding what’s news: A study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. New York: Vintage.
21.
Glasgow University Media Group.1980. More bad news. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
22.
Griffin, M.1992. Looking at TV news: Strategy for research. Communication13: 121-41.
23.
Griffin, M.1999. The Great War photographs: Constructing myths of history and photojournalism. In Picturing the past: Media, history, and photography, ed. B. Brennen and H. Hardt, 122-57. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
24.
Griffin, M.2004. Picturing America’s "War on Terrorism" in Afghanistan and Iraq: Photographic motifs as news frames. Journalism5: 381-402.
25.
Griffin, M., and J. Lee.1995. Picturing the Gulf War: Constructing images of war in Time, Newsweek, and US News & World Report. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly72: 813-25.
26.
Hall, S.1974. The determination of news photographs. In The manufacture of news, ed. S. Cohen and J. Young.London: Constable. Revised edition 1981; pp. 147-156 .
27.
Hall, S.1997. The spectacle of the "other." In Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices, ed. S. Hall, 223-79. London: Sage.
28.
Hall, S., I. Connell, and L. Curti.1976. The "unity" of current affairs television . Working Papers in Cultural Studies9, 51-93, University of Birmingham, UK.
29.
Hallin, D.1994. We keep America on top of the world: Television journalism and the public sphere. New York: Routledge.
30.
Hartley, J.1982. Understanding news. New York: Routledge.
31.
Hartley, J.1984. Encouraging signs: Television and the power of dirt, speech, and scandalous categories. In Interpreting television: Current research perspectives, ed. W. D. Rowland and B. Watkins, 119-41. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
32.
Hartley, J.1992. The politics of pictures: The creation of the public in the age of popular media. New York: Routledge.
33.
Juluri, V.2002. Music Television and the invention of youth culture in India. Television & New Media3: 367-86.
34.
Kurtz, H.2001. ABC stops endless replay of tragedy. Washington Post, September, 19.
35.
Levine, E.2005. Fractured fairy tales and fragmented markets: Disney’s weddings of a lifetime and the cultural politics of media conglomeration. Television & New Media6: 71-88.
36.
MacDougall, C.1987. Interpretative reporting. New York : Macmillan.
37.
Martinec, R., and A. Salvay.2005. A system for image-text relations in new (and old) media. Visual Communication4: 337-71.
38.
Marvin, C.1999. Blood sacrifice and the nation: Myth, ritual, and the American flag. New York: Cambridge University Press.
39.
McGee, M.C.1980. "The ideograph": A link between rhetoric and ideology . In Readings in rhetorical criticism, ed. C. R. Burgchardt, 452-67. State College, PA : Strata.
40.
Messaris, P.1998. Visual aspects of media literacy. Journal of Communication48 (1): 70-80.
41.
Moores, S.1995. Media, modernity, and lived experience. Journal of Communication Inquiry19 (1): 5-19.
42.
Newton, J.2001. The burden of visual truth: The role of photojournalism in mediating reality. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
43.
Oguss, G.2005. "Whose barrio is it?" Chico and the Man and the integrated ghetto shows of the 1970s. Television & New Media6: 3-21.
44.
Osborn M.1967. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 53: 115-26.
45.
Pew Research Center for the People & the Press.2004. Survey report: News audiences increasingly politicized . June 8, 2004. http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=215 (accessed July 12, 2009).
46.
Royce, T.1998. Synergy on the page: Exploring intersemiotic complementarity in page-based multimodal text. JASFL Occasional Papers1 (1): 25-50.
47.
Schwartz, D.1999. Objective representation: Photographs as facts. In Picturing the past: Media, history, and photography, ed. B. Brennen and H. Hardt , 158-81. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
48.
Stein, S.R.2001. Legitimating TV journalism in 60 Minutes: The implications of subordinating the visual to the primacy of the word. Critical Studies in Media Communication18: 249-69.
49.
Tuchman, G.1978. Making news: A study in the construction of reality. New York: The Free Press.
50.
Tufte, E.R.1983. The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
51.
Waisbord, S.2004. McTV: Understanding the global popularity of television formats. Television & New Media5: 359-83.
52.
Zelizer, B.1998. Remembering to forget: Holocaust memory through the camera’s eye. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53.
Zelizer, B.2002. Journalism, photography, and trauma. In Journalism after September 11, ed. B. Zelizer and S. Allan, 48-68. New York: Routledge.
54.
Zelizer, B.2005. Journalism through the camera’s eye. In Journalism: Critical issues, ed. S. Allan , 167-76. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
