This article examines the contemporary configuration of power relations in the U.K. television sector, probing, in the process, the enduring accuracy of longstanding economic arguments concerning distributor dominance in the “cultural industries” more broadly. Such arguments are important because we cannot understand the power of the media unless we understand the circulation of power within the media. The article shows that while recent developments in respect to both producer—distributor and producer—advertiser relationships have begun to enhance the leverage enjoyed by the production community, the steady inflation of the mass-market premium enjoyed by the leading distributors (the terrestrial broadcasters) in the advertising market has largely sustained their power, in relation to smaller (multichannel) distributors, to producer suppliers, and—of course— to the consuming public.
Aksoy, A., and K. Robins.1982. Hollywood for the 21st Century: Global Competition for Critical Mass in Image Markets. Cambridge Journal of Economics16:1-22.
2.
BBC.2005. A New Window of Opportunity for Indies. Speech given by Jana Bennett at the BBC/PACT Briefing Day, London, July 13. http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/speeches/stories/bennett_indies.shtml (accessed December 4, 2005).
3.
Benkler, Y.2006. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
4.
Bettig, R.1996. Copyrighting Culture: Political Economy of Intellectual Property. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
5.
Broadcast. 2006. Indies attack cuts in production budgets. 16 March.
6.
---. 2007a. Jowell Backs Public Service Publisher. 22 January.
7.
---. 2007b. Pact Agrees Terms of Trade with BBC. 8 February.
8.
---. 2007c. Super-indies Link Up for New VoD Service. 19 April.
9.
Calabrese, A., and C. Sparks , eds. 2003. Toward a Political Economy of Culture: Capitalism and Communication in the Twenty-First Century. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers .
10.
Channel 4. 2003. Report and Financial Statements2003. http://www.channel4.com/media/pdfs/annual_report_2003/accounts_section.pdf (accessed May 8, 2005 ).
11.
---. 2007. Unpublished Advertising Revenue Data for the Commercial Terrestrial Broadcasters, 2001-2006 (copy available from author).
12.
Clarke, S.2006. Equity Firm Nabs Brit TV Producer. Variety , August 1.
13.
Collins, R., N. Garnham, and G. Locksley.1988. The Economics of Television: The UK Case. London: Sage.
14.
Curran, J.2002. Media and Power. London: Routledge.
15.
Curtin, M.2003. Media Capital: Towards the Study of Spatial Flows . International Journal of Cultural Studies6 (2): 202-28.
16.
Davenport, T., and J. Beck.2001. The Attention Economy: Understanding the New Currency of Business. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
17.
David Graham & Associates.2000. Out of the Box: The Program Supply Market in a Digital Age. A Report for the Department for Culture, Media and Sport. http://www.culture.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/AEA5903A-E29B-4847-BC2C-58FE8321323B/0/Outofthebox.pdf (accessed August 11, 2005).
18.
Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS).1998. Creative Industries Mapping Document 1998. http://www.culture.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/5D342E05-1AF1-464A-93BA-8B7C13E3855B/0/tvradio.pdf (accessed August 13, 2005).
Einstein, M.2004. Media Diversity: Economics, Ownership, and the FCC. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
21.
Fisher, F., J. McGowan, and D. Evans.1980. The Audience-Revenue Relationship for Local Television Stations. The Bell Journal of Economics11:694-708.
22.
Fiske, J.1986. Television: Polysemy and Popularity. Critical Studies in Mass Communication3 (4): 391-408.
23.
---. 1987. Television Culture. New York: Methuen.
24.
Freeview. 2007. Our Channels. http://www.freeview.co.uk/channels/?__SITE=public&p[0]=channels (accessed April 24, 2007).
25.
Gantz, J.2004. Pirates of the Digital Millennium: How the War Over Intellectual Property Is Destroying Companies, Economies, and Personal Freedoms. London: FT Prentice Hall .
26.
Garnham, N.1987. Concepts of Culture: Public Policy and the Cultural Industries . Cultural Studies1 (1): 23-37.
27.
---. 2005. From Cultural to Creative Industries: An Analysis of the Implications of the "Creative Industries" Approach to Arts and Media Policy Making in the UK. International Journal of Cultural Policy11:15-30.
28.
Goldhaber, M.1997. The Attention Economy and the Net. http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue2_4/goldhaber/ (accessed April 18, 2007).
29.
Grossberg, L.1984. Strategies of Marxist Cultural Interpretation. Critical Studies in Mass Communication1:392-421.
30.
Herman, E., and N. Chomsky.1988. Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. New York: Pantheon.
31.
Hesmondhalgh, D.2002. The Cultural Industries. London : Sage.
32.
Hoskins, C., S. McFadyen, and A. Finn.2004. Media Economics: Applying Economics to New and Traditional Media. London: Sage.
33.
Kellner, D.1990. Television and the Crisis of Democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
34.
Liebes, T., and E. Katz.1990. The Export of Meaning: Cross-Cultural Readings of `Dallas'. New York: Oxford University Press.
35.
Litman, R.1998. The Economics of Television Networks: New Dimensions and New Alliances. In Media Economics: Theory and Practice , ed. A. Alexander, J. Owers, and R. Carveth , 131-50. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36.
Mediatique.2005. From the Cottage to the City: The Evolution of the UK Independent Production Sector. An Independent Report commissioned by the BBC. http://www.bbc.co.uk/thefuture/text/independent_production.html (accessed May 5, 2005).
37.
Mosco, V.1996. The Political Economy of Communication. London: Sage.
38.
Napoli, P.2003. Audience Economics: Media Institutions and the Audience Marketplace. New York: Columbia University Press.
39.
Ofcom. 2003. Digital Television Update-2003 Q3. http://www.ofcom.org.uk/research/tv/reports/dtv/dtv2003q3/#content (accessed October 1, 2005).
40.
---. 2004. Guidelines for Broadcasters in Drafting Codes of Practice for Commissioning Programs from Independent Suppliers. http://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv/ifi/guidance/cop_prog_ind/indies_pdf.pdf (accessed October 11, 2005).
41.
---. 2005a. The Communications Market: Digital Progress Report . Digital TV, Q42005. http://www.ofcom.org.uk/research/tv/reports/dtv/dtu_2005_q4/q4_2005.pdf (accessed May 6, 2006).
42.
---. 2005b. Ofcom Review of Public Service Television Broadcasting . Phase 3-Competition for Quality. http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/psb3/psb3.pdf (accessed October 1, 2005).
43.
---. 2006a. Ofcom Review of the Television Production Sector. http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/tpsr/tpsr.pdf (accessed February 11, 2006).
44.
---. 2006b. Product Placement-Summary of Responses to Consultation on Issues Relating to Product Placement. http://ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/product_placement/statement/statement.pdf (accessed April 4, 2007).
45.
---. 2007a. A New Approach to Public Service Content in the Digital Media Age. http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/pspnewapproach/newapproach.pdf (accessed April 23, 2007).
46.
---. 2007b. Digital Progress Report-Digital TV, Q42006. http://www.ofcom.org.uk/research/tv/reports/dtv/dtu_2006_q4/dtu_2006_q4.pdf (accessed March 21, 2007).
47.
Pact.2006. UK TV Content in the Digital Age: Opportunities and Challenges. http://www.pact.co.uk/uploads/file_bank/2021.pdf.
48.
Schiller, H.1981. Who Knows: Information in the Age of the Fortune 500. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
49.
Silverstone, R.1999. Why Study the Media?London : Sage.
50.
Smythe, D.1981. Dependency Road: Communications, Capitalism, Consciousness and Canada. New York: Greenwood Press.
51.
Waterman, D., and Z. Yan.1999. Cable Advertising and the Future of Basic Cable Networking. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media43:645-58.
52.
Wöhrle, M., and P. Volle.2003. Advertising and How to Survive It: What's Best for Business. Media Context2003 (April): 14-23. http://www.mercermc.com/Perspectives/Specialty/Media_pdfs/Apr03.pdf (accessed April 11, 2005).
