The softcore serial (or “softcore featurette”) is a prolific sexploitation subgenre spawned by the early-nineties popularity of Red Shoe Diaries, Zalman King's late-night Showtime program. Like Red Shoe Diaries, the softcore serial is an elaborately feminized and aspirational form with a pointedly “postfeminist” sensibility. Though this subgenre is also a self-consciously apolitical form structured by double standards and essentialist stereotypes, contemporary feminists have nevertheless been increasingly inclined to condone it, a trend that may dovetail with a larger postfeminist receptiveness to traditional ideas of femininity. This article proposes that the softcore serial and its (post)feminist reception are most usefully framed as the product of three overlapping cultural contexts: the histories of postfeminist cultural production, of American sexploitation cinema, and of premium cable programming.
Andrews, David.2004. Convention and ideology in the contemporary softcore feature: The sexual architecture of house of love. Journal of Popular Culture38 (August): 5—33.
2.
Backstein, Karen.2001. Soft love: The romantic vision of sex on the Showtime network. Television & New Media2 (November): 303—17.
3.
Baldwin, Thomas, and D. StevensMcVoy. 1983. Cable communication. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
4.
Bellafante, Ginia.1996. Now, the sex files. Time, June 10, 76.
5.
Clover, Carol.1992. Men, women, and chain saws: Gender in the modern horror film. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
Cook, Pam.1976. “Exploitation” films and feminism. Screen17 (Summer): 122—27.
7.
Dyer, Richard.1993. The matter of images: Essays on representations . London: Routledge.
Elias, Justine.1996. Review of Delta of Venus, directed by Zalman King . Village Voice, January 9, 62—64.
10.
Gorfinkel, Elena.2002. Radley Metzger's “elegant arousal”: Taste, aesthetic distinction and sexploitation. In Underground U.S.A.: filmmaking beyond the Hollywood canon, ed. Xavier Mendik and Steven Jay Schneider , 26—39. London: Wallflower .
11.
Hippolyte, Alexander Gregory.1997. Interview with Gregory Hippolyte (aka Brown/Dark). Anthony Petkovich. Psychotronic Video26:75—84.
12.
Hollows, Joanne.2000. Feminism, femininity, and popular culture. Manchester: Manchester University Press .
13.
———. 2003. The masculinity of cult. In Defining cult movies: The cultural politics of oppositional taste, ed. Mark Jancovich, Antonio Lázaro Reboll, Julian Stringer, and Andy Willis, 35—53. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
14.
Jaehne, Karen.1983. Confessions of a feminist porn programmer. Film Quarterly37 (Fall): 9—16.
15.
Jenkins, Tricia.2005. “Potential lesbians at two o'clock”: The heterosexualization of lesbianism in the recent teen film. Journal of Popular Culture38 (February): 491—504.
16.
Juffer, Jane. 1998. At home with pornography: Women, sex, and everyday life. New York: New York University Press.
17.
Kim, L.S.2001. “Sex and the single girl” in postfeminism: The F word on television. Television & New Media2 (November): 319—34.
18.
Laqueur, Thomas.2003. Solitary sex: A cultural history of masturbation . New York: Zone.
19.
Lewis, Jon.2000. Hollywood v. hard core: How the struggle over censorship saved the modern film industry. New York: New York University Press.
20.
Lombard, Robert. 2004. E-mail message to author. June 30.
21.
———. 2005. E-mail message to author. February 14.
22.
Mair, George.1988. Inside HBO: The billion dollar war between HBO, Hollywood, and the home video revolution. New York: Dodd, Mead, & Co.
23.
Martin, Nina.1994. Red Shoe Diaries: Sexual fantasy and the construction of the (hetero)sexual woman. Journal of Film and Video46 (Summer): 44—57.
24.
———. 2007. Sexy thrills: Undressing the erotic thriller. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
25.
Modleski, Tania.1991. Feminism without women: Culture and criticism in a “postfeminist” age. New York: Routledge.
26.
Mumford, Laura Stempel.1995. Love and ideology in the afternoon: Soap opera, women, and television genre. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
27.
Nochimson, Martha.1992. No end to her: Soap opera and the female subject . Berkeley: University of California Press.
Phoca, Sophia, and Rebecca Wright.1999. Introducing postfeminism. New York: Totem Books.
30.
Projansky, Sarah.2001. Watching rape: Film and television in postfeminist culture . New York: New York University Press.
31.
Ray, Fred Olen.1991. The new poverty row: Independent filmmakers as distributors . Jefferson, NC: McFarland .
32.
Read, Jacinda.2003. The cult of masculinity: From fan-boys to academic bad-boys . In Defining cult movies: The cultural politics of oppositional taste, ed. Mark Jancovich, Antonio Lázaro Reboll, Julian Stringer, and Andy Willis, 54—70. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
33.
Russell, Diana. [1988] 2000. Pornography and rape: A causal model. In Feminism and pornography, ed. Drucilla Cornell, 48—94. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34.
Schaefer, Eric.1999. “Bold! daring! shocking! true!”: A history of exploitation films, 1919—1959. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
35.
———. 2004. The triumph of exploitation; or, from exploitation film to exploitation culture in eight easy decades. Bridge12 (October/November): 19—25.
36.
Stacey, Judith.1987. Sexism by a subtler name? Postindustrial conditions and postfeminist consciousness in the Silicon Valley. Socialist Review17:7—28.
