Prime-time soap operas of the 1980s arose from an intensification of television production's historically oligopsonistic structure under Reaganomics and deregulation. Whereas regulatory reforms undertaken on behalf of the public interest broadened access to prime-time television for independent producers during the 1970s, Reagan's implementation of tax reforms and deregulatory initiatives concentrated control over prime-time television in the hands of Hollywood's largest producers and syndicators during the 1980s. The one-hour evening soap opera facilitated these companies' domination of prime-time network access and foreign syndication sales by allowing them to use access to a nationwide audience to engage economies of scale in television production.
Andersen, R.1995. Consumer culture and TV programming. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1995.
2.
Ang, I.1985. Watching Dallas: Soap opera and the melodramatic imagination. New York: Routledge.
3.
Balio, T.1990. Introduction to part II. In Hollywood in the age of television, ed. T. Balio, 259-296. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
4.
Barnouw, E.1990. Tube of plenty: The evolution of American television. 2nd ed.New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
Bettig, R. V.1999. Who owns prime time? Industrial and institutional conflict over television programming and broadcast rights. In Framing friction: Media and social conflict, ed. M. S. Mander, 125-160. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
6.
Bielby, D. D., and C. L. Harrington. 2002. Markets and meanings: The global syndication of television programming. In Global culture: Media, arts policy & globalization, ed. D. Crane et al., 215-231. New York: Routledge.
7.
Bierbaum, T.1982. FCC bird vote has some warning of orbital OPEC. Variety, August 4.
8.
Broadcasting. 1988. On the rise in network TV: Costs and independents. June 30.
9.
Browne, N.1987. The political economy of the television (super) text. In Television: The critical view. 4th ed., ed. H. Newcomb, 585-599. New York: Oxford University Press.
10.
Buscombe, E.1990. Coca-Cola satellites? Hollywood and the deregulation of European television. In Hollywood in the age of television, ed. T. Balio, 393-415. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
11.
Collins, R.1988. Wall-to-wall Dallas: The U.S.-U.K. trade in television. In Global Television, ed. C. Schneider and B. Wallis, 79-94. New York: Wedge Press.
12.
Daniels, B.1985. FCB sees $$$ with “stars”; Tailors series to demo needs. Variety, January 9.
13.
Dempsey, J.1984. Stations try to limit runaway prices. Variety, December 12.
14.
Farhi, P.1988. The quiet invasion of the media moguls. Washington Post, November 27.
15.
Feuer, J.1987. The MTM style. In Television: The critical view. 4th ed., ed. H. Newcomb, 52-84. New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
Feuer, J.1995. Seeing through the eighties: Television and Reaganism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
17.
Fiske, John. 1997. Global, national, local? Some problems of culture in a postmodern world. Velvet Light Trap40 (Fall): 58-66.
18.
Fiske, John. 1987. Television culture. New York: Routledge.
19.
Gabler, N.2003. The world still watches America. New York Times, January 9.
20.
Galbraith, J.1986. New UA gets rich from Telepictures. Variety, April 30.
21.
Gitlin, T.1987. Prime time ideology: The hegemonic process in television entertainment. In Television: The critical view. 4th ed., ed. H. Newcomb, 507-532. New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
Gitlin, T.1983. Inside prime time. New York: Pantheon Books.
23.
Gomery, D.1984. Economic change in the U.S. television industry, Screen25 (2): 62-67.
24.
Gripsrud, J.1995. The Dynasty years: Hollywood television and critical media studies. New York: Routledge.
25.
Hagedorn, R.1995. Doubtless to be continued: A brief history of serial narrative. In To be continued: Soap operas around the world, ed. R. C. Allen, 27-48. New York: Routledge.
26.
Hall, S.1991. Brave new world. Socialist review21 (1): 57-64.
27.
Horowitz, R. B.1989. The irony of deregulatory reform: The deregulation of American telecommunications. New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
Jessop, B.1990. State theory: Putting capitalist states in their place. University Park, PA: Penn State Press.
29.
Jhally, S.1989. The political economy of culture. In Cultural politics in contemporary America, ed. I. Angus and S. Jhally, 65-81. New York: Routledge.
30.
Kaplan, P.1985. Why the rich rule the TV roost. New York Times, April 7.
31.
Karlin, B.1986. Brits turn from kitchen sink. Variety, March 26.
32.
Kellner, D.1990. Television and the crisis of democracy, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
33.
Knight, B.1985. Network program strategy: The value of a hit. Variety, January 16.
34.
Litman, B.1990. Network oligopoly power: An economic analysis. In Hollywood in the age of television, ed. T. Balio, 115-144. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
35.
Loftus, J.1984. Hungary and CBS sign TV partnership. Variety, December 5.
36.
MacDonald, N.1990. One nation under television: The rise and decline of network TV. New York: Pantheon Books.
37.
McClellan, S., and S. Coe. 1988. The powers that be in Hollywood. Broadcasting, August 1.
38.
Olson, S. R.1999. Hollywood planet: Global media and the competitive advantage of narrative transparency. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39.
Owen, B., J. Beebe, and W. Manning. 1974. Television economics. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
40.
Pitman, J.1984. Satellite cable era in Britain makes its bow. Variety, January 18.
41.
Playboy. 1980. Interview: Larry Hagman. November.
42.
Richter, P.1986. Ad agencies near agreement on merger: Britain's Saatchi & Saatchi seeks to purchase Ted Bates Worldwide. Los Angeles Times, May 10. http://www.lexis.nexis.com
43.
Schiller, H.1989. The privatization of culture. In Cultural politics in contemporary America, ed. I. Angus and S. Jhally, 317-332. New York: Routledge.
44.
Variety. 1985. Sky Channel sked has U.S. indie air. January 16.
45.
Variety. 1986a. L-T bids producers to take peek underneath its new big-top tent. June 25.
46.
Variety. 1986b. Victorious loser of Dallas war. February 5.
