Goa Trance and the Practice of Community in the Age of the Internet

Abstract

This article considers the online dialogue of an electronic mailing list devoted to discussion of a genre of music called Goa or psychedelic trance. Attending in particular to the ways legitimate participation is policed in this online forum, this article argues that the debate over the social potential of computer-mediated communication demands an attention to actual discursive practices and contexts in and through which online claims to community are articulated. Community must appear not as an already objectified standard against which novel social forms can be judged but a discursive context for the production of social identities and relations. As such, it is to the connections between textual productions of self and community and the online contexts or genres in which those categories are given life that we must turn in addressing the enormous affective investments in internet talk evident today.

Keywords

Goa music psychedelic trance computer-mediated communication internet

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson, B. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. New York: Verso.

Ang, I. 1996. Living Room Wars: Rethinking Media Audiences for a Postmodern World. New York: Routledge.

Appadurai, A. 1996. Modernity at Large. Minneapolis: UniversityofMinnesotaPress.

Baym, N. 1993. Interpreting Soap Operas and Creating Community: Inside a Computer Mediated Fan Culture. Journal of Folklore Research 30: 143-176.

Baym, N. K. 1995. The Emergence of Community in Computer-Mediated Communication. In CyberSociety: Computer-Mediated Communication and Community, edited by S. G. Jones , 138-163. London: Sage.

Bey, H. 1985. T.A.Z.: The Temporary Autonomous Zone, Ontological Anarchy, Poetic Terrorism. Brooklyn, NY: Autonomedia.

Bourdieu, P. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power, edited and introduced by John B. Thompson ; translated by Gino Raymond and Matthew Adamson. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Deleuze, G. , and F. Guattari . 1987. AThousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Dornfeld, B. 1998. Producing Public Television, Producing Public Culture.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

10.

Giddens, A. 1994. Living in a Post-Traditional Society. In Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order, edited by A. Giddens , U. Beck , and S. Lash , 56-110.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

11.

Jones , Steven G. 1997. The Internet and Its Social Landscape. InVirtual Culture: Identity and Communication in Cybersociety, edited by Steven G. Jones , 7-35.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

12.

Keil , Charles , and Steven Feld . 1994. Music Grooves: Essays and Dialogues.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

13.

Levinson, P. 1998. The Soft Edge: ANatural History and Future of the Information Revolution. New York: Routledge.

14.

Miller, D. 1995. Introduction: Anthropology, Modernity, and Consumption. In Worlds Apart: Modernity through the Prism of the Local. New York: Routledge.

15.

Miller, D. 1998. A Theory of Shopping. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

16.

Miller, D. 2000. The Fame of Trinis: Websites as Traps. Journal ofMaterial Culture 5 (1): 5-24.

17.

Miller , Daniel , and Don Slater . 2000. The Internet: An Ethnographic Approach.Oxford, UK; New York: Berg.

18.

Rheingold, H. 1993. The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

19.

Thornton, S. 1996. Club Cultures: Music, Media, and Subcultural Capital. Hanover: University Press of New England.

20.

Turkle, S. 1995. Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Touchstone.

21.

Williams, R. 1975. Television: Technology and Cultural Form. New York: Schocken Books.

22.

Williams, R. 1977. Marxism and Literature. New York: Oxford University Press.