If we are to understand series such as the first U.K. version of Big Brother as events, rather than just as texts or production processes, we need to draw on anthropological theory, for example, Dayan and Katz's theory of media events. This article develops an anthropologically informed argument about the status of Big Brother as event, its ambiguous claims to present social “reality,” and the connection of those claims with its other claim to offer “liveness” in a new web-enhanced form. These ambiguities can be traced not only in the discourse of the program but also in the discourses by producers and others that surrounded it, ambiguities that are ideological in the same way that “myth” was for Roland Barthes.
Billig, Michael. 1997. From Codes to Utterances: Cultural Studies, Discourse and Psychology. In Cultural Studies in Question, edited by M. Ferguson and P. Golding, pp. 205–226. London: Sage.
3.
Bolter, Jay David, and Richard Grusin. 1999.Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4.
Boorstin, Daniel. 1961.The Image—Or What Happened to the American Dream. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.
5.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990.Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
6.
Corner, John. 1999. Review of Media Ritual and Identity, edited by T. Liebes and J. Curran.European Journal of Cultural Studies2 (3): 416–419.
7.
Couldry, Nick. 2000a. Fake Talk Shows and Other Scandals: Taking Media (Un)Belief Seriously. Unpublished manuscript.
8.
Couldry, Nick. 2000b.The Place of Media Power: Pilgrims and Witnesses of Media Power. London: Routledge.
9.
Couldry, Nick. 2001. The Umbrella Man: Crossing a Landscape of Speech and Silence.European Journal of Cultural Studies4 (2): 131–152.
Dayan, Daniel, and Elihu Katz. 1992.Media Events: The Live Broadcasting of History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
Douglas, Mary. 1984.Purity and Danger. London: Ark Paperbacks.
13.
Durkheim, Emile. [1912] 1995.The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Translated by K. Fields. New York: Free Press.
14.
Feuer, Jane. 1983. The Concept of Live Television: Ontology as Ideology. In Regarding Television, edited by E. A. Kaplan. Los Angeles: The American Film Institute.
15.
Geertz, Clifford. 1980.Negara: The Theatre State in Nineteenth Century Bali. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
Jones, Janet. 2001. Pore Close TV. Presentation given to MeCCSA Conference, Loughborough University, January.
17.
Lawson, Mark. 2000. Where Were You When Nasty Nick Was Kicked Out of Big Brother?Guardian, 18 August, G2:2–3.
18.
Maffesoli, Michel. 1993.The Shadow of Dionysus. New York: State University of New York Press.
19.
Maffesoli, Michel. 1996.The Time of the Tribes. London: Sage.
20.
Meyrowitz, Joshua. 1992. The Power of TV News.The World and I, June.
21.
Ritchie, Jean. 2000.Big Brother: The Official Unseen Story. London: Channel Four Books.
22.
Saenz, Michael. 1994. Television Viewing as a Cultural Practice. In Television: The Critical View, 4th ed., edited by H. Newcombe. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
Scannell, Paddy. 1996.Radio, Television and Modern Life. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
24.
Silverstone, Roger. 1981.The Message of Television. London: Heinemann Educational Books.
25.
Silverstone, Roger. 1988. Television Myth and Culture. In Media Myths and Narratives, edited by J. Carey. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26.
Turner, Victor. 1974.Dramas Fields and Metaphors. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
27.
Turner, Victor. 1992.The Anthropology of Performance. New York: PAJ.
28.
Williams, Raymond. 1975.Drama in a Dramatised Society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
