Nursing Testimony Before Congress,1993-2011

Abstract

This article describes nurses’ testimony before congressional committees between1993 and 2011. We address three questions: (a) How have trends in nurses’ testimony changed over time? (b) What do data reveal about nursing’s engagement with health policy issues on the congressional agenda? (c) How might the findings be useful in implementation of health care reform and the Institute of Medicine report on the Future of Nursing. Using LexisNexis® Congressional online database, we identified 434 nursing testimonies presented at congressional hearings. Descriptive statistics were used to examine characteristics of the nurse expert witnesses and the testimonies topics on which they testified. Nurses most frequently testified on workforce issues (36%), followed by access and coverage (14%). The majority of the nurse witnesses had graduate degrees 65% and lived and worked in fewer than 10 states. Nurses appeared before House or Senate appropriations committees 38% more often than before any other congressional committees. Our findings point to the need for additional research, especially given the crescendo of calls for nursing to step up to the political table. The article concludes with implications for future research and policy action.

Keywords

political action federal legislation Congress congressional testimony

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

AARP Public Policy Institute. (2010). Nursing provisions P.L.111-148, the Patient Protection, Affordability and Care Act. Retrieved from http://championnursing.org/sites/default/files/nursingandhealthreformlawable.pdf

American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2004). AACN position statement on the practice doctorate in nursing. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/DNP/DNPPositionStatement.htm

American Nurses Association. (2010). Health system reform: Nursing’s goal of high quality, affordable care for all. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/Policy-Advocacy/HealthSystemReform/HealthCareReformResources/Health-System-Reform.pdf

Baumgartner

F. R.

Jones

B. D.

(2002). Policy dynamics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Cohen

S. S.

Mason

D. J.

Kovner

Leavitt

J. K.

Pulcini

Sochalski

(1996). Stages of nursing’s political development. Where we’ve been and where we ought to go. Nursing Outlook, 44, 259-266.

Donelan

Buerhaus

P. I.

DesRoches

Burke

S. P.

(2010). Health policy thoughtleaders’ views of the healthcare workforce in an area of health reform. Nursing Outlook, 58, 175-180.

Fairman

J. A.

Rowe

J. W.

Hassmiller

Shalala

D. E.

(2011). Broadening the scope of nursing practice. New England Journal of Medicine, 364, 193-194. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1012121

Gruen

R. L.

Campbell

E. G.

Blumenthal

(2006). Public roles of U.S. physicians: Community participation, political involvement, and collective advocacy. Journal of the American Medical Association, 296, 2467-2675.

Gutermuth

(1999). The American medical political action committee: Which senators get the money and why? Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 24, 357-382.

10.

Institute of Medicine. (2011). The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

11.

Kingdon

J. W.

(2011). Agendas, alternatives and public policies (Updated 2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Longman/Addison-Wesley.

12.

Kraus

C. K.

Suarez

T. A.

(2004). Is there a doctor in the house? Or the senate? Journal of the American Medical Association, 292, 2125-2129.

13.

Laugesen

M. J.

Rice

(2003). Is the doctor in? The evolving role of organized medicine in health policy. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 31, 887-994.

14.

Leyden

K. M.

(1995). Interest group resources and testimony at congressional hearings. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 20, 431-439.

15.

National Research Council. (1996). Nursing staff in hospitals and nursing homes: Is it adequate? Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

16.

Policy Agendas Project. (n.d.) University of Texas at Austin, College of Liberal Arts. Retrieved from http://www.policyagendas.org/

17.

Rabinowitz

Laugesen

(2010). Niche players in health policy: Medical specialty societies in Congress 1969-2002. Social Science & Medicine, 71, 1341-1348. doi:10.1016/j.socsciemed.2010.06.035.

18.

Rohde

(2005). Committees and policy formation. In Quirk

P. J.

Binder

S. A.

(Eds.), Institutions of American democracy: The legislative branch (pp. 201-204). New York, NY: Oxford University Press

19.

Ridenour

Trautman

(2009). A primer for nurses on advancing health reform policy. Journal of Professional Nursing, 25, 358-362. doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2009.10.003