BroomeM. E. (2007). Collaboration: The devil’s in the detail. Nursing Outlook, 55, 1-2.
4.
Canadian Academy of Health Science. (2005). The benefits and barriers to interdisciplinary research in the health sciences in Canada framework document. Retrieved from http://www.cahs-acss.ca/e/pdfs/2006-01.assessment.pdf
5.
ClarkP. G. (1997). Values in health care professional socialization: Implications for geriatric education in interdisciplinary teamwork. The Gerontologist, 37, 441-451.
6.
FehrC. (2004). Feminism and science: Mechanism without reductionism. National Women’s Studies Association Journal, 16, 136-156.
7.
KnaflL.GreyM. (2008). Clinical translational science awards: Opportunities and challenges for nurse scientists. Nursing Outlook, 56, 132-137.
8.
KuhnT. (2000). Barriers to Interdisciplinary Research and Training. In PellmarT. C.EisenbergL. (Eds.), Bridging disciplines in the brain, behavioral, and clinical sciences (pp. 41-57). Washington, DC: National Academic press.
9.
LoebS. J.PenrodJ.KolanowskiA.HupceyJ. E.KopenhaverK. (2008). Creating cross-disciplinary research alliances to advance nursing science. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 40, 195-201.
StevensonJ.WoodsN. (1985). Strategies for the year 2000: Synthesis and projections, setting the agenda for the year 2000: Knowledge development in nursing. Proceedings from American Academy of Nursing Advisory Group on Knowledge Development and Utilization, American Academy of Nursing; Kansas city.
16.
Sullivan-MarxE. (2006). Directions for the development of nursing knowledge. Policy, Politics & Nursing Practice, 7, 164-168.