Newborn screening is an important public health programs in the United States. Over 4 million infants are screened each year for a number of conditions. There is a growing need for more explicit state policies governing the storage and research use of residual newborn samples. This paper provides an overview of newborn screening and issues related to policies of residual newborn samples as well as attitudes and opinions from stakeholders. Three groups (n = 21) were conducted with stakeholders: an African American group, a Pediatrician group and a Mothers of young children group. Despite the differences between these groups, consistent themes emerged from all groups that may be relevant for policy development governing the storage and use of residual newborn samples. The data from this exploratory study suggest that future policy developments with the newborn screening program warrant further public input on these topics.
American Academy of Pediatrics. (2000). Serving the family from birth to the medical home. Newborn screening: A blueprint for the future-a call for a national agenda on state newborn screening programs . Pediatrics, 160, 389-422.
2.
American College of Medical Genetics. (2009 ). Position statement on the importance of residual newborn screening dried blood spots. Retrieved October 16, 2009, from http://www.acmg.net/StaticContent/NewsReleases/Blood_Spot_Position_Statement2009.pdf
3.
Andrews, L. B., Fullarton, J. E., Holtzman, N. A., & Motulsky, A. G. (Eds.). (1994). Assessing genetic risks: Implications for health and social policy. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
4.
Bates, B.R. ( 2005). Public culture and public understanding of genetics: A focus group study. Public Understanding of Science, 14, 47-65.
5.
Bearder v. State of Minnesota, Hennepin County District Court (December 7, 2009).
6.
Beleno v. Texas Dept. of State Health Services, U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas (filed March 12, 2009).
7.
Botkin, J.R. ( 2005). Research for newborn screening: Developing a national framework. Pediatrics, 116, 862-871.
8.
Botkin, J.R., Clayton, E.W., Fost, N.C., Burke, W., Murray, T.H., Baily, M.A., et al. (2006). Newborn screening technology: Proceed with caution. Pediatrics, 117, 1793-1799.
9.
Chen, D.T., Rosenstein, D.L., Muthappan, P., Hilsenbeck, S.G., Miller, F.G., Emanuel, E.J., et al. (2005). Research with stored biological samples: What do research participants want? Archives of Internal Medicine , 165, 652-655.
10.
Citizens’ Council on Health Care. (2007 ). Governor Pawlenty failing to act on illegally obtained baby DNA [Press release]. Retrieved 7/17/2008, from http://cchconline.org/pr/pr081507.php
11.
Clayton, E.W. ( 2003). Ethical, legal, and social implications of genomic medicine . New England Journal of Medicine, 349, 562-569.
12.
Corbie-Smith, G., Thomas, S.B., Williams, M.V., & Moody-Ayers, S. (1999). Attitudes and beliefs of African Americans toward participation in medical research. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 14, 537-546.
13.
Davis, T.C., Humiston, S.G., Arnold, C.L., Bocchini, J., Bass, P.F., Kennen, E.M., et al. (2006). Recommendations for effective newborn screening communication: Results of focus groups with parents, providers, and experts . Pediatrics, 117, 326-340.
14.
Detmar, S., Hosli, E., Dijkstar, N., Nijsingh, N., Rijnders, M., & Verweij, N. ( 2007). Information and informed consent for neonatal screening: Opinions and preferences for parents. Birth, 34, 238-244.
15.
Faden, R.R., Holtzman, N.A., & Chwalow, A.J. ( 1982). Parental rights, child welfare, and public health: The case of PKU screening. American Journal of Public Health, 72, 1396-1400.
16.
Fant, K.E., Clark, S.J., & Kemper, A.R. ( 2005). Completeness and complexity of information available to parents from newborn screening programs. Pediatrics, 115, 1268-1272.
17.
Freimuth, V.S., Quinn, S.C., Thomas, S.B., Cole, G., Zook, E., & Duncan, T. ( 2001). African Americans’ views on research and the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Social Science & Medicine, 52(5), 797-808.
18.
Gamble, J., & Kassardijian, E. (2008). The use of selected community groups to elicit and understand the values underlying attitudes towards biotechnology . Public Understanding of Science, 17, 245-259.
19.
Gamble, V.N. ( 1997). Under the shadow of Tuskegee: African Americans and health care. American Journal of Public Health, 87, 1773-1778.
20.
General Accounting Office. (2003). Newborn screening: Characteristics of state programs. Retrieved July 19, 2008, from http://www.gao.ogve/new.items/d03449.pdf
21.
Hiller, E.H., Landenburger, G., & Natowicz, M.R. (1997). Public participation in medical policy-making and the status of consumer autonomy: The example of newborn-screening programs in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 87, 1280-1288.
22.
Kharaboyan, L., Avard, D., & Knoppers, B.M. (2004). Storing newborn blood spots: Modern controversies. International and Comparative Health Law and Ethics, Winter, 741-748.
23.
Kitzinger, J. ( 1994). The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health and Illness , 16, 103-121.
24.
Kitzinger, J. ( 1995). Qualitative research: Introducing focus groups. British Medical Journal, 311, 299-302.
25.
Krueger, R.A. ( 1994). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
26.
Krueger, R.A., & Casey, M.A.( 2009). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
Maschke, K.J. ( 2009). Disputes over research with residual newborn screening blood specimens. The Hastings Center Report, 39(4).
28.
Miller, W.L., & Crabtree, B.F. (1992). Primary care research: multi-method typology and qualitative road map. In B. F. Crabtree & W. L. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research. 3-28New-bury Park, CA: Sage.
29.
Morgan, D. ( 1988). Focus groups as qualitative research. London: Sage.
30.
Morgan, D. ( 1993). Qualitative content analysis: A guide to paths not taken . Qualitative Health Research, 3, 112-121.
31.
Morgan, D., & Zhao, P.Z. ( 1993). The doctor-caregiving relationship: Managing the care of family members with Alzheimer’s disease. Qualitative Health Research, 3, 133-164.
32.
National Newborn Screening and Genetics Resource Center. ( 2000). National newborn screening report. Retrieved September 26, 2009, from http://genes-r-us.uthscsa.edu/resources/newborn/00/ch2_complete.pdf
33.
Olney, R.S., Moore, C.A., Ojodu, J.A., Lindegren, M.L., & Hannon, W.H. ( 2006). Storage and use of residual dried blood spots from state newborn screening programs. Pediatrics, 148, 618-622.
34.
Rothwell, E.W., & Lamarque, J. ( 2010). The use of focus groups to compare tobacco attitudes and behaviors between youth in urban and rural settings. Health Promotion Practice.
35.
Rothwell, E.W., Sihirath, K., Badger, H., Negley, S., & Piatt, J. ( 2008). The emotional dynamics of groups during a challenge course experience. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Leadership , 8(2), 1-19.
36.
Sandelowski, M. ( 2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health, 23, 334-340.
37.
Stewart, D.W., Shamdasani, P.N., & Rook, D.W. ( 2007). Focus groups: Theory and practice. London: Sage.
38.
Tesch, R. ( 1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools . London: Falmer.
39.
Therrell, B.L., Hannon, W.H., Pass, K.A., et al. (1996). Guidelines for the retention, storage, and use of residual blood spot samples after newborn screening analysis: statement of the Council of Regional Networks for Genetic Services. Biochem Mol Med., 57, 116-124.
40.
Therrell, B.L., Hannon, H., Bailey, D., Fleischman, A., Goldman, E., Monaco, J., et al. (2009). Considerations and recommendations for a national policy regarding the retention and use of dried-blood spot specimens after NBS. Retrieved August 26, 2009, from http://www.resourcerepository.org/documents/1681/briefingpaper:considerationsandrecommendationsforanationalpolicyregardingtheretentionanduseofdriedbloodspotspecimensafternewborns/
41.
Therrell, B.L., Johnson, A., & Williams, D. ( 2006). Status of newborn screening program in the United States . Pediatrics, 117, 212-252.
42.
Waisbren, S.E. ( 2008). Expanded newborn screening: Information and resources for the family physician. American Family Physician, 77, 987-994.
43.
Wendler, D., & Emanuel, E.J. ( 2002). The debate over research on stored biological samples: What do sources think? Archives of Internal Medicine, 162, 1457-1462.
44.
Wilkinson, S. ( 1998). Focus groups in health research: Exploring the meanings of health and illness. Journal of Health Psychology, 3, 329-348.
