This study analyzes age-productivity relationships in professional football using two comprehensive datasets. The first examines detailed OPTA performance data from the Spanish LaLiga, the English Premier League, and the Colombian Liga Águila, creating productivity indices using principal component analysis. The second uses complete career histories from transfermarkt.com for players across Argentina, Brazil, Chile, and Colombia, applying Fantasy Premier League scoring systems. Both datasets consistently demonstrate an inverted U-shaped age-productivity curve. Peak performance occurs at 27.8 years in the EPL and 30.1–30.5 years in LaLiga and Colombian leagues, according to OPTA data. The transfermarkt analysis confirms this pattern, showing peak performance at 29.9 years across South American leagues. The findings reveal a systematic shift toward older peak performance ages in modern football, attributed to advances in sports science, nutrition, and training methods. These results offer valuable insights for talent management, contract negotiations, and career planning in professional sports.
AlcoverC. M.GuglielmiD.DepoloM.MazzettiG. (2021). “Aging-and-Tech job vulnerability”: A proposed framework on the dual impact of aging and AI, robotics, and automation among older workers. Organizational Psychology Review, 11(2), 175–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386621992105
3.
AllenS. V.HopkinsW. G. (2015). Age of peak competitive performance of elite athletes: A systematic review. Sports Medicine, 45(10), 1431–1441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0354-3
4.
AndersonC.SallyD. (2013). The Numbers Game. Why everything you know about soccer is wrong. Penguin Books.
5.
BerengerV.Verdier-ChouchaneA. (2007). Multidimensional measures of well-being: Standard of living and quality of life across countries. World Development, 35(7), 1259–1276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.10.011
Börsch-SupanA. (2013). Myths, scientific evidence and economic policy in an aging world. The Journal of the Economics of Aging, 1-2, 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeoa.2013.06.001
8.
Börsch-SupanA.HunklerC.WeissM. (2021). Big data at work: Age and labor productivity in the service sector. The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, 19, 100319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeoa.2021.100319
9.
Börsch-SupanA.WeissM. (2016). Productivity and age: Evidence from work teams at the assembly line. The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, 7, 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeoa.2015.12.001
BrysonA.DoltonP.ReadeJ. J.SchreyerD.SingletonC. (2021). Causal effects of an absent crowd on performances and refereeing decisions during COVID-19. Economics Letters, 198, 109664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109664
12.
CastelucciF.PadulaM.PicaG. (2011). The age-productivity gradient: Evidence from a sample of F1 drivers. Labour Economics, 18(4), 464–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2010.09.002
13.
CylusJ.Al TayaraL. (2021). Health, an ageing labour force, and the economy: Does health moderate the relationship between population age-structure and economic growth?Social Science & Medicine, 287, 114353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114353
FischerK.ReadeJ. J.SchmalW. B. (2022). What cannot be cured must be endured: The long-lasting effect of a COVID-19 infection on workplace productivity. Labour Economics, 79, 102281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2022.102281
17.
GoffJ. E.AsaiT.HongS. (2014). A comparison of Jabulani and Brazuca non-spin aerodynamics. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology, 228(3), 188–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754337114526173
18.
GoldblattD. (2007). The ball is round: A global history of football. Penguin UK.
19.
JolliffeI. T. (2002). Principal Components Analysis (2nd Ed.). Springer.
20.
KahaneL.LongleyN.SimmonsR. (2013). The effects of coworker heterogeneity on firm-level output: Assessing the impacts of cultural and language diversity in the national hockey league. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(1), 302–314. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00221
21.
KalénA.ReyE.de Rellán-GuerraA. S.Lago-PeñasC. (2019). Are soccer players older now than before? Aging trends and market value in the last three decades of the UEFA champions league. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 76. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00076
22.
LeeR.MasonA. (2011). Population aging and the generational economy: key findings. In LeeR.MasonA. (Eds.), Population Aging and the Generational Economy. A Global Perspective.Ed. Edward Elgar.
23.
LovászA.RigóM. (2013). Vintage effects. Ageing and Productivity in Labour Economics (22), 47–60.
24.
MaestasN.MullenK. J.PowellD. (2023). The effect of population aging on economic growth, the labor force, and productivity. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 15(2), 306–332. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.20190196
MortimerG. (2012). A history of football in 100 objects. Profile Books.
27.
ParkC. Y.ShinK.KikkawaA. (2021). Aging, automation, and productivity in Korea. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 59, 101109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjie.2020.101109
RelañoA. (2014). Tantos mundiales, tantas historias: Claves, relatos y leyendas del mayor acontecimiento del fútbol. Roca Editorial.
30.
Sal de Rellán-GuerraA.ReyE.KalénA.Lago-PeñasC. (2019). Age-related physical and technical match performance changes in elite soccer players. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 29(9), 1421–1427. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.13463
31.
SkirbekkV. (2004). Age and individual productivity: A literature survey. In FeichtingerG. (Ed.), Vienna Yearbook of Population Research (pp. 133–153). Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
32.
TovarJ. (2020). Performance, diversity and national identity evidence from association football. Economic Inquiry, 58(2), 897–916. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12861
33.
TovarJ.UrdinolaB. P. (2014). Inequality in national inter-generational transfers: Evidence from colombia. International Advances in Economic Research, 20(2), 167–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-013-9455-7
34.
VyasS.KumaranayakeL. (2006). Constructing socio-economic status indices: How to use principal components analysis. Health Policy and Planning, 21(6), 459–468. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czl029
