This article exactly determines the impact of pool sharing on the talent distribution in the league for a general n–team model where each team is a profit maximizer, each team has the Nash conjectures, each team's revenue depends only on relative team qualities, and the supply of talent is fixed. It is shown that when a pool-sharing agreement is introduced, larger-market teams with greater marginal revenues of winning before sharing will demand more wins and talents than before sharing, while smaller-market teams with smaller marginal revenues of winning before sharing will demand less wins and talents than before sharing.
DietlH. M.LangM.RathkeA. (2011). The combined effect of salary restrictions and revenue sharing in sports leagues. Economic Inquiry, 49(2), 447–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2010.00330.x
3.
El-HodiriM.QuirkJ. (1971). An economic model of a professional sports league. Journal of Political Economy, 79(6), 1302–1319. https://doi.org/10.1086/259837
FortR.QuirkJ. (1995). Cross-subsidization, incentives, and outcomes in professional team sports leagues. Journal of Economic Literature, 33(3), 1265–1299.
FujimotoM. (2020). Equal revenue sharing and the optimal distribution of talent in the N-team leagues. Journal of Sports Economics, 21(2), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527002519867368
8.
FujimotoM. (2023). A dynamic analysis of equal revenue sharing and endogenous salary caps in the N-team leagues. Journal of Sports Economics, 24(5), 624–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/15270025221143983
9.
KésenneS. (2000). Revenue sharing and competitive balance in professional team sports. Journal of Sports Economics, 1(1), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/152700250000100105
10.
KésenneS. (2005). Revenue sharing and competitive balance: Does the invariance proposition hold?Journal of Sports Economics, 6(1), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527002503259334
11.
KésenneS. (2014). The economic theory of professional team sports: An analytical treatment (2nd ed). Edward Elgar.
MaddenP. (2015). “Walrasian fixed supply conjecture” versus “contest-nash” solutions to sports league models: Game over?Journal of Sports Economics, 16(5), 540–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527002513502795
Moreno-TerneroJ. D.PawlowskiT.WeberS. (2024). Domestic competitive balance and international success: The case of the football industry. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.08396. 1–23.
17.
RockerbieD. (2009). Free agent auctions and revenue sharing: A simple exposition. Journal of Sport Management, 23(1), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.23.1.87
SloaneP. J. (2015). The economics of professional football revisited. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 62(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjpe.12063
21.
SzymanskiS. (2004). Professional team sports are only a game: The walrasian fixed-supply conjecture model, contest-nash equilibrium, and the invariance principle. Journal of Sports Economics, 5(2), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527002503261485
22.
SzymanskiS. (2006). Professional team sports are only a game: The walrasian fixed-supply conjecture model, contest-nash equilibrium, and the invariance principle, reply. Journal of Sports Economics, 7(2), 240–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527002504272948
23.
SzymanskiS. (2013). Some observations on fort and winfree “nash conjectures and talent supply in sports league modeling: A comment on current modeling disagreements”. Journal of Sports Economics, 14(3), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527002512438616
TopkisD. M. (1998). Supermodularity and complementarity. Princeton University Press.
26.
VivesX. (1999). Oligopoly pricing: Old ideas and new tools. The MIT Press.
27.
VroomanJ. (1995). A general theory of professional sports leagues. Southern Economic Journal, 61(4), 971–990. https://doi.org/10.2307/1060735
28.
VroomanJ. (2009). Theory of the perfect game: Competitive balance in monopoly sports leagues. Review of Industrial Organization, 34(1), 5–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-009-9202-7
29.
ZimbalistA. (2003). May the best team win: Baseball economics and public policy. Brookings Institution.
