In professional boxing, a higher-ranked boxer chooses his opponent among challengers varying in popularity and strength. We build a three-stage model of a professional boxing fight between the chooser and a challenger to examine the strategic incentives of a chooser in sharing the purse and exerting a proper level of effort. More importantly, we endogenize the choice of the opponent and the purse to be generated. We found that an older chooser who is ready to cash in his reputation tends to choose a stronger opponent with little effort, while a young rising “star” prefers a match against weaker opponents.
AmegashieJ. A.KutsoatiE. (2005). Rematches in boxing and other sporting events. Journal of Sports Economics, 6(4), 401–411.
2.
BalmerN. J.NevillA. M.LaneA. M. (2005). Do judges enhance home advantage in European championship boxing?Journal of Sports Sciences, 23(4), 409–416.
3.
BinmoreK. G.RubinsteinA.WolinskyA. (1986). The Nash Bargaining Solution in economic modelling. Rand Journal of Economics, 17, 176–188.
4.
BinmoreK. G. (1987). Perfect Equilibria in Bargaining Models. In Binmore, K. G. & P. Dasgupta (Eds.). The Economics of Bargaining (pp. 77–105), Oxford: Blackwell.
5.
ButlerD.ButlerR.MaxcyJ. (2020). New insights on the Louis-Schmeling paradox: Determinants of demand for subscription and pay-per-view boxing. European Sport Management Quarterly, 1–21.
6.
ChaplinD. (2012). Pay and Race in World championship Boxing. Journal of Economics (0361-6576), 38(1), 43–57.
7.
ChaplinD.MadrigalE.MaguetaD. (2017). Outcome uncertainty, the superstar effect, talent and live attendance in professional boxing. Athens Journal of Sports, 4(3), 197–212.
8.
ChaplinD.BrownK.HarrisJ. (2018). The Power of Self-Promotion: Twitter followers and Guaranteed Purses in professional boxing. Journal of Economic Insight, 44(2), 23–40.
9.
DietlH. M.LangM.WernerS. (2010). Corruption in professional Sumo: An update on the study of Duggan and Levitt. Journal of Sports Economics, 11(4), 383–396.
10.
DugganM.LevittS. D. (2002). Winning isn’t everything: Corruption in sumo wrestling. American Economic Review, 92(5), 1594–1605.
11.
HowardR. W. (2006). A complete database of international chess players and chess performance ratings for varied longitudinal studies. Behavior Research Methods, 38(4), 698–703.
12.
IssabayevM.OskenbayevY. (2019). Title or Money. Economics Bulletin, 39(3), 1912–1917.
13.
JiaH.SkaperdasS.VaidyaS. (2013). Contest functions: Theoretical foundations and issues in estimation. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 31(3), 211–222.
14.
NashJ. F. (1953). Two-Person Cooperative Games. Econometrica, 21, 128–140.
15.
OkadaA. (2010). The Nash bargaining solution in general n-person cooperative games. Journal of Economic Theory, 145(6), 2356–2379.
16.
RubinsteinA. (1982). Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model. Econometrica, 50, 97–109.
17.
ShepotyloO. (2005). Three-Point-For-Win in Soccer: Are There Incentives for Match Fixing?. Available at SSRN 755264.
18.
TenorioR. (2000). The economics of professional boxing contracts. Journal of Sports Economics, 1(4), 363–384.
19.
TenorioR. (2006). On the competitive structure in professional boxing, or why the best boxers very seldom fight each other. Handbook on the Economics of Sport364–368.
20.
TullockG. (1980). Efficient rent seeking. In James Buchanan, R. T., & Tullock, G. (Eds.). Towards a theory of the Rent-Seeking society (pp. 97–112). College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press.
