This research addresses the importance of gender in the pricing process of the sports betting industry. Specifically, we investigate the impact of gender in the prices that bookmakers offer for tennis matches. Despite widespread evidence of gender bias both in the practice of the sport and its media coverage, tennis is one of the sports that has done most to achieve equality. The analysis of 51,881 tennis matches reveals that betting firms quote higher prices for women's matches than for men's, even when considering uncertainty due to the surprise factor and the media attention. The separate analysis of two bookmakers strengthens the evidence for the role of media attention as a source of gender-related information asymmetry.
AbinzanoI.CampionM. J.MugaL.Raventós-PujolA. (2021). Sports betting and the Black Litterman model: A new portfolio-management perspective. International Journal of Sport Finance, 16(4), 182–193. https://doi.org/10.32731/IJSF/164.112021.02
2.
AbinzanoI.MugaL.SantamariaR. (2020). The role of small bettors in price formation in betting exchanges. Applied Economics, 52(33), 3637–3650. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2020.1717427
3.
AhmedF.AsidR.HinaS.MuzammilM. (2017). Financial market prediction using Google Trends. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 8(7), 388–391. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2017.080752
BrownA.RambaccussingD.ReadeJ.RossiG. (2018). Forecasting with social media: Evidence from tweets on soccer matches. Economic Enquiry, 56(3), 1748–1763. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12506
6.
BrownA.ReadeJ. J. (2019). The wisdom of amateur crowds: Evidence from an online community of sports tipsters. European Journal of Operational Research, 272(3), 1073–1081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.07.015
7.
BrownA.YangF. (2015). Does society underestimate women? Evidence from the performance of female jockeys in horse racing. Journal of Economic Behaviour & Organization, 111(C), 106–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.12.031
8.
BruceA.MarginsonD. (2014). Power, not fear: A collusion-based account of betting market inefficiency. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 21(1), 77–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/13571516.2013.782982
9.
BruceT. (2016). New rules for new times: Sportswomen and media representation in the third wave. Sex Roles, 74(7-8), 361–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0497-6
10.
CainM.LawD.PeelD. (2003). The favourite-longshot bias, bookmaker margins and insider trading in a variety of betting markets. Bulletin of Economic Research, 55(3), 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8586.00174
11.
CheX.FeddersenA.HumphreysB. R. (2017). Price setting and competition in fixed odds betting markets. In RodríguezP.HumphreysB. R.SimmonsR. (Eds.), The economics of sports betting (pp. 38–51). Edward Elgar.
12.
CookyC.MessnerM. A.HextrumR. H. (2013). Women play sport, but not on TV: A longitudinal study of televised news media. Communication & Sport, 1(3), 203–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479513476947
13.
CrossmanJ.VincentJ.SpeedH. (2007). `The times they are a-changinǵ: Gender comparisons in three national newspapers of the 2004 Wimbledon Championships. International Sociology of Sport Association, 42(1), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690207081828
14.
del CorralJ. (2009). Competitive balance and match uncertainty in Grand Slam tennis: Effects of seeding system, gender, and court surface. Journal of Sport Economics, 10(6), 563–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527002509334650
15.
del CorralJ.Prieto-RodriguezJ. (2010). Are differences in ranks good predictors for grand slam tennis matches?International Journal of Forecasting, 26(3), 551–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2009.12.006
16.
DomeneghettiR. (2018). ‘The other side of the net’: (re)presentations of (emphasised) femininity during Wimbledon 2016. Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events, 10(2), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/19407963.2018.1403164
17.
Du BoisC.HeyndelsB. (2007). It’s a different game you go to watch: Competitive balance in men’s and women’s tennis. European Sport Management Quarterly, 7(2), 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184740701353349
18.
FeddersenA.HumphreysB. R.SoebbingB. P. (2017). Sentiment bias and asset prices: Evidence from sports betting markets and social media. Economic Inquiry, 55(2), 1119–1129. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12404
19.
FleppR.NüeschS.FranckE. (2017). The liquidity advantage of the quote-driven market: Evidence from the betting industry. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 64(C), 306–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2016.07.016
20.
FranckE.VerbeekE.NüeschS. (2010). Prediction accuracy of different market structures -bookmakers versus a betting exchange. International Journal of Forecasting, 26(3), 448–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2010.01.004
Godoy-PresslandA.GriggsG. (2014). The photographic representation of female athletes in the British printmedia during the London 2012 olympic games. Sport in Society, 17(6), 808–823. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2014.882908
23.
Gomez-GonzalezC.del CorralJ. (2018). The betting market over time: Overround and surebets in European football. Economics and Business Letters, 7(4), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.17811/ebl.7.4.2018.129-136
24.
HarrisL. (2003). Trading and exchanges: Market microstructure for practitioners. Oxford University Press Inc.
25.
HeibergerR. H. (2015). Collective attention and stock prices: Evidence from Google Trends data on Standard and Poor's 100. PlosOne, 10(8), e0135311. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135311
26.
KianE. M.ClavioG. (2011). A comparison of online media and traditional newspaper coverage of the meńs and womeńs U.S. Open tennis tournaments. Journal of Sports Media, 6(1), 55–84. https://doi.org/10.1353/jsm.2011.0004
27.
KlaassenF.MagnusJ. (2001). Are points in tennis independent and identically distributed? Evidence from a dynamic binary panel data model. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96(454), 500–509. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214501753168217
28.
LatoeiroP.VeigaH.RamosS. F. (2013). Predictability of stock market activity using Google search queries. DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS 130605. Universidad Carlos III de Madrid.
MagnusJ. R.KlaassenF. J. G. M. (1999). The final set in a tennis match: Four years at Wimbledon. Journal of Applied Statistics, 26(4), 461–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664769922340
32.
PettyC.PopeS. (2019). A new age for media coverage of women’s sport? An analysis of English media coverage of the 2015 FIFA Women’s World Cup. Sociologia (Lisbon, Portugal), 53(3), 486–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038518797505
33.
QuayleM. (2019). Stereotyping by omission and commission: Creating distinctive gendered spectacles in the televised coverage of the 2015 Australian Open men’s and women’s tennis singles semi-finals and finals. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 54(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690217701889
SherwoodM.OsborneA.NicholsonM.SherryE. (2017). Newswork, news values, and audience considerations: Factors that facilitate media coverage of women’s sports. Communication & Sport, 5(6), 647–668. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479516645535
37.
ShinH. (1991). Optimal betting odds against insider traders. The Economic Journal, 101(408), 1179. https://doi.org/10.2307/2234434
38.
ShinH. S. (1992). Prices of state contingent claims with insider traders, and the favourite-longshot bias. The Economic Journal, 102(411), 426–435. https://doi.org/10.2307/2234526
39.
ShinH. S. (1993). Measuring the incidence of insider trading in a market for state-contingent claims. The Economic Journal, 103(420), 1141–1153. https://doi.org/10.2307/2234240
40.
SimM. K.ChoiD. G. (2020). The winning probability of a game and the importance of points in tennis matches. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 91(3), 361–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2019.1666203
41.
TejkalovaA. N.KristoufekL. (2021). Anything can happen in womeńs tennis, or can it? An empirical investigation into bias in sports journalism. Communication & Sport, 9(5), 742–760. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479519890571
42.
YipA. (2018). Deuce or advantage? Examining gender bias in online coverage of professional tennis. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 53(5), 517–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690216671020
