Models of reference-dependent preferences show that an individual’s utility depends on the difference between the outcome and a “neutral” reference point. Our paper investigates how distance from reference points affects future performance. We find that round numbers and personal bests motivate runners and that missing the goal by a small amount improves future performance. For those who achieve their goal, future performance suffers slightly. In empirical analysis, we use an extensive panel of marathon data, which contains a past running history for every runner in our sample and allows us to estimate runners’ ability and experience.
AndersonA.GreenE. A. (2018). Personal bests as reference points. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(8), 1772–1776. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1706530115
3.
BakerM.PanX.WurglerJ. (2012). The effect of reference point prices on mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Financial Economics, 106(1), 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.04.010
4.
BarberB.LeeY.LiuY.OdeanT. (2007). Is the aggregate investor reluctant to realize losses? Evidence from Taiwan. European Financial Management, 13(3), 423–447. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036X.2007.00367.x
5.
BarberisN. C. (2013). Thirty years of prospect theory in economics: A review and assessment. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(1), 173–195. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.27.1.173
6.
Bar-EliM.TenenbaumG.PieJ. S.BteshY.AlmogA. (1997). Effect of goal difficulty, goal specificity and duration of practice time intervals on muscular endurance performance. Journal of Sports Sciences, 15(2), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/026404197367407
7.
BolesT.MessickD. (1995). A reverse outcome bias: The influence of multiple reference points on the evaluation of outcomes and decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 61(3), 262–275. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1021
8.
BurdinaM.HillerR. S.MetzN. E. (2017). Goal attainability and performance: Evidence from Boston marathon qualifying standards. Journal of Economic Psychology, 58(58), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2017.01.001
9.
CardD.MasA.MorettiE.SaezE. (2012). Inequality at work: The effect of peer salaries on job satisfaction. American Economic Review, 102(6), 2981–3003. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.6.2981
10.
CamererC.BabcockL.LoewensteinG.ThalerR. (1997). Labor supply of New York city cabdrivers: One day at a time. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 407–441. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355397555244
11.
CrawfordV.MengJ. (2011). New York City cab drivers’ labor supply revisited: Reference-dependent preferences with rational expectations targets for hours and income. American Economic Review, 101(5), 1912–1932. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.5.1912
12.
FehrE.GoetteL. (2007). Do workers work more if wages are high? Evidence from a randomized field experiment. American Economic Review, 97(1), 298–317. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.97.1.298
13.
GrantD. (2016). The essential economics of threshold-based incentives: Theory, estimation, and evidence from the western states 100. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 130, 180–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2016.07.013
KőszegiB.RabinM. (2006). A model of reference-dependent preferences. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(4), 1133–1165. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/121.4.1133
MarkleA.WuG.WhiteR.SackettR. (2018). Goals as reference points in marathon running: A novel test of reference-dependence. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 56(1), 19–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-018-9271-9
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 1039–1061. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937956
24.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122574
