We examine loss aversion in the context of professional golf at US Open tournaments. In particular, we analyze data from two courses, Pebble Beach Golf Links and Oakmont Country Club, where they have hosted six and five US Opens, respectively. The United States Golf Association changed the par rating of a hole on each course from a par 5 to a par 4, without fundamentally altering the hole, in each US Open hosted by these courses since 2000. In this natural experimental setting, we find evidence of significant loss-aversive behavior in the world’s best golfers based solely on par rating.
FehrE.GoetteL. (2007). Do workers work more if wages are high? Evidence from a randomized field experiment. American Economic Review, 97(1), 298–317.
6.
FryerR. G.JrLevittS. D.ListJ.SadoffS. (2012). Enhancing the efficacy of teacher incentives through loss aversion: A field experiment. Technical report. National Bureau of Economic Research.
7.
KahnemanD.KnetschJ. L.ThalerR. H. (1990). Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 98(6), 1325–1348.
8.
KahnemanD.TverskyA. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292.
9.
KnetschJ. L. (1989). The endowment effect and evidence of nonreversible indifference curves. American Economic Review, 79(5), 1277–1284.
LevittS. D.ListJ. A. (2008). Homo economicus evolves. Science, 319(5865), 909–910.
12.
NovemskyN.KahnemanD. (2005). The boundaries of loss aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(2), 119–128.
13.
PedaceR.SmithJ. K. (2013). Loss aversion and managerial decisions: Evidence from major league baseball. Economic Inquiry, 51(2), 1475–1488.
14.
PopeD. G.SchweitzerM. E. (2011). Is Tiger Woods loss averse? Persistent bias in the face of experience, competition, and high stakes. American Economic Review, 101(1), 129–157.
15.
PutlerD. S. (1992). Incorporating reference price effects into a theory of consumer choice. Marketing Science, 11(3), 287–309.
16.
R Core Team. (2020). R: A Language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
17.
RiedlD.HeuerA.StraussB. (2015). Why the three-point rule failed to sufficiently reduce the number of draws in soccer: An application of prospect theory. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 37(3), 316–326.
18.
RomerD. (2002). It’s fourth down and what does the bellman equation say? A dynamic programming analysis of football strategy. Technical report. National Bureau of Economic Research.
19.
Sokol-HessnerP.HsuM.CurleyN. G.DelgadoM. R.CamererC. F.PhelpsE. A. (2009). Thinking like a trader selectively reduces individuals’ loss aversion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(13), 5035–5040.
20.
TanakaT.CamererC. F.NguyenQ. (2010). Risk and time preferences: Linking experimental and household survey data from Vietnam. American Economic Review100(1), 557–571.
21.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 1039–1061.
22.
UrschelJ. D.ZhuangJ. (2011). Are NFL coaches risk and loss averse? Evidence from their use of kickoff strategies. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 7(3), Article 14.
