This study looks at the impact of a university making a surprise (“Cinderella”) run in the men’s NCAA basketball tournament. Our results suggest that surprise success in the tournament has little to no impact on the quantity of applications in subsequent years. However, we find that freshmen enrollments increase for private schools two academic years after a Cinderella run (with mixed results on the quality of freshmen—although not worse). Given an average private school, with 1,253 freshmen and paid tuition of $24,428 (each year) plus room and board, a Cinderella run is worth approximately $7.3 million in 2012-dollars.
BremmerD.KesselringR. (1993). The advertising effect of university athletic success—A reappraisal of the evidence. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 33, 409–421.
2.
CaudillS. B.HouricanS.MixonF. G. (2018). Does college football impact the size of university applicant pools and the quality of entering students?Applied Economics, 50, 1885–1890.
3.
ChungD. J. (2013). The dynamic advertising effect of collegiate athletics. Marketing Science, 32(5), 679–698.
EggersA.GroothuisP. A.ReddingP.RotthoffK. W.SoliminiM. (2019). The negative effect of NCAA football bowl bans on university enrollment and applications. Applied Economics, 51(54), 5870–5877.
6.
EggersA.GroothuisP. A.ReddingP.RotthoffK. W.SoliminiM. (2020). Universities behaving badly: The impact of athletic malfeasances on student quality and enrollment. Journal of Sports Economics, 21(1), 87–100.
7.
GoidelR. K.HamiltonJ. M. (2006). Strengthening higher education through gridiron success? Public perceptions of the impact of national football championships on academic quality. Social Science Quarterly, 87(4), 851–862.
8.
Hernández-JuliánR.RotthoffK. W. (2014). The impact of college football on academic achievement. Economics of Education Review, 43, 141–147.
JacobB.McCallB.StangeK. (2018). College as country club: Do colleges cater to students’ preferences for consumption?Journal of Labor Economics, 36(2), 309–348.
11.
LindoJ. M.SwensenI. D.WaddellG. R. (2012). Are big-time sports a threat to student achievement?American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4(4), 254–274.
12.
MarcusJ. (2019, October10). Radical survival strategies for struggling colleges. New York Times.
13.
MaloneyM. T.McCormickR. E. (1993). An examination of the role that intercollegiate athletic participation plays in academic achievement. Journal of Human Resources, 28(3), 555–570.
14.
McCormickR.TinsleyM. (1987). Athletics versus academics? Evidence from SAT scores. Journal of Political Economy, 95, 1103–1116.
15.
McEvoyC. (2006). The impact of elite individual athletic performance on university applicants for admission in NCAA division I-A football. The Sport Journal, 9(1).
16.
MixonF. (1995). Athletics versus academics? Rejoining the evidence from SAT scores. Education Economics, 3, 277–283.
17.
MixonF.HsingY. (1994). The determinants of out-of-state enrollments in higher education: A Tobit analysis. Economics of Education Review, 13(4), 329–335.
18.
MixonF. G.TrevinoL. J. (2005). From kickoff to commencement: The positive role of intercollegiate athletics in higher education. Economics of Education Review, 24(1), 97–102.
19.
MixonF. G.TrevinoL. J.MintoT. C. (2004). Touchdowns and test scores: Exploring the relationship between athletics and academics. Applied Economics Letters, 11(7), 421–424.
20.
MixonF. G.ResslerR. W. (1995). An empirical note on the impact of college athletics on tuition revenues. Applied Economics Letters, 2, 383–387.
21.
MulhollandS. E.TomicA.SholanderS. (2014). The Faculty Flutie factor: Does football performance affect a university’s US news and world report peer assessment score?Economics of Education Review, 43, 79–90.
22.
MurphyR.TrandelG. (1994). The relation between a university’s football record and the size of its applicant pool. Economics of Education Review, 13, 265–270.
23.
PopeD. G.PopeJ. C. (2009). The impact of college sports success on the quantity and quality of student applications. Southern Economic Journal, 75(3), 750–780.
24.
PopeD. G.PopeJ. C. (2014). Understanding college application decisions: Why college sports success matters. Journal of Sports Economics, 15(2), 107–131.
SmithD. (2009). College football and student quality: An advertising effect or culture and tradition?The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 68(2), 553–580.
27.
SmithD. (2015). It pays to bend the rules: The consequences of NCAA athletic sanctions. Sociological Perspectives, 58(1), 97–119.
28.
TuckerI. (2004). A reexamination of the effect of big-time football and basketball success on graduation rates and alumni giving rates. Economics of Education Review, 23, 655–661.
29.
TuckerI. (2005). Big-time pigskin success: Is there an advertising effect?Journal of Sports Economics6, 222–229.
30.
TuckerI.AmatoL. (1993). Does big-time success in football or basketball affect SAT scores?Economics of Education Review, 12, 177–181.
31.
TuckerI.AmatoL. (2006). A reinvestigation of the relationship between big-time basketball success and average SAT scores. Journal of Sports Economics, 7(4), 428–440.
