We examine whether the moment just before the half-time break is a particularly good time to score a goal. Using detailed data from the top five European football leagues between the 2013-2014 and 2017-2018 seasons, we exploit the quasi-random occurrence of goals scored just before and just after the half-time break. In the former situation, the game is exogenously interrupted by a break immediately after the goal, whereas in the latter situation, the game continues without interruption. We show that in the case of a goal being scored just before halftime, the scoring team benefits more from the half-time break than the conceding team.
AdlerP. (1981). Momentum: A theory of social action. Sage.
2.
AytonP.BraennbergA. (2008). Footballers’ fallacies. In AnderssonP.AytonP.SchmidtC. (Eds.), Myths and facts about football: The economics and psychology of the world’s greatest sport (pp. 23–38). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
3.
BaertS.AmezS. (2018). No better moment to score a goal than just before half time? A Soccer myth statistically tested. PLoS One, 13(3), e0194255.
4.
BartlingB.BrandesL.SchunkD. (2015). Expectations as reference points: Field evidence from professional soccer. Management Science, 61(11), 2646–2661.
5.
BergerJ.PopeD. (2011). Can losing lead to winning?Management Science, 57(5), 817–827.
6.
BlessH.CloreG. L.SchwarzN.GolisanoV.RabeC.WölkM. (1996). Mood and the use of scripts: Does a happy mood really lead to mindlessness?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(4), 665–679.
7.
BrechotM.FleppR. (2020). Dealing with randomness in match outcomes: how to rethink performance evaluation in european club football using expected goals. Journal of Sports Economics, 21(4), 335–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527002519897962
8.
CroxsonK.ReadeJ. (2013). Information and efficiency: Goal arrival in soccer betting. The Economic Journal, 124(575), 62–91.
9.
EdwardsJ. (1979). The home field advantage. In GoldsteinJ. H. (Ed.), Sports, games, and play: Social and psychological viewpoints (pp. 409–438). Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
FleppR.FranckE. (2019). The role of boards’ misperceptions in the relation between managerial turnover and performance: Evidence from European football(UZH Business Working Paper Series, No. 380). Department of Business Administration, University of Zurich. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3312801
11.
GauriotR.PageL. (2018). Psychological momentum in contests: The case of scoring before half-time in football. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 149, 137–168.
12.
GilovichT.ValloneR.TverskyA. (1985). The hot hand in basketball: On the misperception of random sequences. Cognitive Psychology, 17(3), 295–314.
13.
HermS.Callsen-BrackerH. M.KreisH. (2014). When the crowd evaluates soccer players’ market values: Accuracy and evaluation attributes of an online community. Sport Management Review, 17(4), 484–492.
14.
IsenA. M.MeansB. (1983). The influence of positive affect on decision-making strategy. Social Cognition, 2, 18–31.
15.
IsenA. M.DaubmanK. A.GorgoglioneJ. M. (1987). The influence of positive affect on cognitive organization. In SnowR.FarrM. (Eds.), Aptitude, learning and instruction: Affective and cognitive processes (pp. 125–154). Erlbaum.
16.
IsenA. M.MeansB.PatrickR.NowickiG. (1982). Some factors influencing decision making strategy and risk-taking. In ClarkM. S.FiskeS. T. (Eds.), Affect and cognition: The Seventeenth Annual Carnegie-Mellon Symposium on Cognition (pp. 243–261). Erlbaum.
17.
Iso-AholaS. E.DotsonC. O. (2014). Psychological momentum: Why success breeds success. Review of General Psychology, 18(1), 19–33.
18.
Iso-AholaS. E.MobilyK. (1980). “Psychological momentum”: A phenomenon and an empirical (unobtrusive) validation of its influence in a competitive sport tournament. Psychological Reports, 46(2), 391–401.
19.
LazarusR. S. (1991). Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion. American Psychologist, 46(8), 819–834.
20.
MarkmanK. D.GuentherC. L. (2007). Psychological momentum: Intuitive physics and naive beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(6), 800–812.
21.
MeltonR. J. (1995). The role of positive affect in syllogism performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(8), 788–794.
22.
MüllerO.SimonsA.WeinmannM. (2017). Beyond crowd judgments: Data-driven estimation of market value in association football. European Journal of Operational Research, 263(2), 611–624.
23.
NtoumanisN.BiddleS. J. (1998). The relationship of coping and its perceived effectiveness to positive and negative affect in sport. Personality and Individual Differences, 24(6), 773–788.
24.
O’ReillyC. A. (1982). Variations in decision makers’ use of information sources: The impact of quality and accessibility of information. Academy of Management Journal, 25(4), 756–771.
25.
PollardR. (1986). Home advantage in soccer: A retrospective analysis. Journal of Sports Sciences, 4, 237–248.
26.
RussellM.WestD. J.HarperL. D.CookC. J.KilduffL. P. (2015). Half-time strategies to enhance second-half performance in team-sports players: A review and recommendations. Sports Medicine, 45(3), 353–364.
27.
SchwartzB.BarskyS. F. (1977). The home advantage. Social Forces, 55, 641–661.
28.
SchwarzN. (1990). Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In HigginsE. T.SorrentinoR. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 527–561). Guilford Press.
29.
SchwarzN. (2002). Situated cognition and the wisdom of feelings: Cognitive tuning. In Feldman BarrettL.SaloveyP. (Eds.), The wisdom in feelings (pp.144–166). Guilford.
30.
SchwarzN. (2011). Feelings-as-information theory. In Van LangeP. A. M.KruglanskiA. W.Tory HigginsE. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 289–308). Sage.
31.
TaylorJ.DemickA. (1994). A multidimensional model of momentum in sports. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 6(1), 51–70.
32.
TaylorS. E. (1991). Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 110(1), 67–85.
