National accolades and positive media attention are frequently lavished upon successful collegiate sports programs. Correspondingly, studies have demonstrated that universities often benefit from the achievements of their athletic teams by increasing the schools’ application numbers, student quality, and alumni donations. This study demonstrates that the opposite effect occurs when a university’s sports team is accused of engaging in impropriety. Our findings suggest that the negative attention given to the National Collegiate Athletic Association postseason tournament ban of a men’s basketball program could serve as a signal to prospective students regarding the quality of the institution. This perception ultimately leads to a decrease in the infracting university’s enrollment the year before the ban that then rebounds the year after the ban. However, the ban reduces the percentage of high-achieving students who choose to attend the university after the ban has been implemented.
BaadeR. A.SundbergJ. O. (1996). Fourth down and gold to go? Assessing the link between athletics and alumni giving. Social Science Quarterly, 77, 789–803.
2.
BarnhartB. (2012). Demystifying the NCAA enforcement and investigation process. American Bar Association-Young Lawyers Division, Annual Meetings, August 3. Chicago, IL.
3.
CaudillS. B.HouricanS.MixonF. G. (2018). Does college football impact the size of university applicant pools and the quality of entering students?Applied Economics, 50, 1885–1890.
4.
ChressanthisG. A.GrimesP. W. (1993). Intercollegiate sports success and first-year student enrollment demand. Sociology of Sport Journal, 10, 286–300.
5.
ChungD. J. (2013). The dynamic advertising effect of collegiate athletics. Marketing Science, 32, 679–698.
6.
FisherB. (2009). Athletics success and institutional rankings. New Directions for Higher Education, 148, 45–53.
7.
GroothuisP. A.EggersA. F.ReddingP. T. (2019). The impact of NCAA men’s basketball probations on the quantity and quality of student applications and enrollment. Applied Economic Letters, 26(8).
8.
Hernandez-JulianR.RotthoffK. W. (2014). The impact of college football on academic achievement. Economics of Education Review, 43, 141–147.
9.
HumphreysB. R. (2006). The relationship between big-time college football and state appropriations for higher education. International Journal of Sport Finance, 1, 119–128.
10.
JacobB.McCallB.StangeK. (2018). College as country club: Do colleges cater to students’ preferences for consumption?Journal of Labor Economics, 36, 309–348.
11.
JonesA. (2009). Athletics, applications, and yields. College and University, 85, 10.
12.
LindoJ. M.SiminskiP.SwensenI. D. (2018). College party culture and sexual assault. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 10, 236–265.
13.
LindoJ. M.SwensenI. D.WaddellG. R. (2012). Are big-time sports a threat to student achievement?American Economic Journal of Applied Economics, 4, 254–274.
14.
McCormickR. E.TinsleyM. (1987). Athletics versus academics? Evidence from SAT scores. Journal of Political Economy, 95, 1103–1116.
15.
McEvoyC. (2005). The relationship between dramatic changes in team performance and undergraduate admissions applications. The SMART Journal, 2, 17–24.
16.
MixonF. G.TrevinoL. J. (2005). From kickoff to commencement: The positive role of intercollegiate athletics in higher education. Economics of Education Review, 24, 97–102.
17.
MixonF. G.JrTrevinoL. J.MintoT. C. (2004). Touchdowns and test scores: Exploring the relationship between athletics and academics. Applied Economics Letters, 11, 421–424.
18.
MulhollandS. E.TomicA. S.SholanderS. N. (2014). The faculty Flutie factor: Does football performance affect a university’s US News and World Report peer assessment score?Economics of Education Review, 43, 79–90.
19.
MurphyR. G.TrandelG. A. (1994). The relation between a university’s football record and the size of its applicant pool. Economics of Education Review, 13, 265–270.
20.
PopeD. G.PopeJ. C. (2009). The impact of college sports success on the quantity and quality of student applications. Southern Economic Journal, 75, 750–780.
21.
PopeD. G.PopeJ. C. (2014). Understanding college application decisions why college sports success matters. Journal of Sports Economics, 15, 107–131.
22.
SandersonA. R.SiegfriedJ. J. (2018). The national collegiate athletic association cartel: Why it exists, how it works, and what it does. Review of Industrial Organization, 52, 185–209.
23.
SeguraJ.WillnerJ. (2018). The game is good at the top. Journal of Sports Economics, 19, 645–676.
24.
SmithD. (2008). Big-time college basketball and the advertising effect does success really matter?Journal of Sports Economics, 9, 387–406.
25.
SmithD. (2009). College football and student quality: An advertising effect or culture and tradition?The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 68, 553–580.
26.
SmithD. (2015). It pays to bend the rules: The consequences of NCAA athletic sanctions. Sociological Perspectives, 58, 97–119.
27.
TomaJ.CrossM. (1998). Intercollegiate athletics and student college choice: Exploring the impact of championship seasons on undergraduate applications. Research in Higher Education, 39, 633–661.
28.
TuckerI. B.AmatoL. T. (2006, November). A reinvestigation of the relationship between big-time basketball success and average SAT scores. Journal of Sports Economics, 7, 428–440.
29.
WhiteD. R.CowanB. W.WootenJ. (2019). March madness: NCAA tournament participation and college alcohol use. Contemporary Economic Policy, 37(3), 449–461.
