Using estimates of Major League Baseball (MLB) financials from Forbes, we conduct a cost–benefit analysis of performance-enhancing drug (PED) testing. Player PED suspensions are shown to have lowered franchise values by statistically and economically significant margins through negative impacts on teams’ nongate revenues and expected future profit growth. Testing, however, also increased competitive balance through reductions in player costs which compressed the distribution of team wins per dollar. Finally, we estimate the number of PED suspensions per season which balances the costs and benefits of testing at the league and team levels and compare it to MLB’s current policy.
BeckerG. S.MurphyK. M.GrossmanM. (2006). The market for illegal goods: The case of drugs. Journal of Political Economy, 114, 38–60.
3.
BeckerG. S.StiglerG. J. (1974). Law enforcement, malfeasance, and compensation of enforcers. The Journal of Legal Studies, 3, 1–18.
4.
BerriD. J.SchmidtM. B.BrookS. L. (2006). The wages of wins: Taking measure of the many myths in modern sport. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
5.
BlassA. A. (1992). Does the baseball labor market contradict the human capital model of investment?The Review of Economics and Statistics, 74, 261–268.
6.
BrownD.LinkC. R. (2008). Population and bandwagon effects on local team revenues in Major League Baseball. Journal of Sports Economics, 9, 470–487.
7.
CameronA. C.TrivediP. K. (2005). Linear panel models: Extensions. In Microeconometrics: Methods and applications (pp. 763–768). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
CisykJ.CourtyP. (2017). Do fans care about compliance to doping regulations in sports? The impact of PED suspensions in baseball. Journal of Sports Economics, 18, 323–350.
10.
El HodiriM.QuirkJ. (1971). An economic model of a professional sports league. The Journal of Political Economy, 79, 1302–1319.
11.
FergusonD. G.JonesJ. C. H.StewartK. G. (2000). Competition within a cartel: League conduct and team conduct in the market for baseball player services. Review of Economics and Statistics, 82, 422–430.
12.
FortR.QuirkJ. (1995). Cross-subsidization, incentives, and outcomes in professional team sports leagues. Journal of Economic Literature, 33, 1265–1299.
HausmanJ. A.LeonardG. K. (1997). Superstars in the national basketball association: Economic value and policy. Journal of Labor Economics, 15, 586–624.
15.
HumphreysB. R.MondelloM. (2008). Determinants of franchise values in North American professional sports leagues: Evidence from a hedonic price model. International Journal of Sport Finance, 3, 98–105.
16.
JannB. (2008). Multinomial goodness-of-fit: Large sample tests with survey design correction and exact tests for small samples. The Stata Journal, 8, 147–169.
17.
KydlandF. E.PrescottE. C. (1977). Rules rather than discretion: The inconsistency of optimal plans. Journal of Political Economy, 85, 473–492.
18.
LeveneH. (1960). Robust tests for equality of variances. In IngramO.GhuryeS. G.HoeffdingW.MadowW. G.MannH. B. (Eds.), Contributions to probability and statistics: Essays in honor of Harold hotelling (pp. 278–292). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
19.
LewisM. (2004). Moneyball: The art of winning an unfair game. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
20.
MyersonR. B. (1979). Incentive compatibility and the bargaining problem. Econometrica, 47, 61–74.
21.
RottenbergS. (1956). The baseball players’ labor market. The Journal of Political Economy, 64, 242–258.
22.
RosenS. (1981). The economics of superstars. The American Economic Review, 71, 845–858.
23.
ScullyG. W. (1974). Pay and performance in Major League Baseball. The American Economic Review, 64, 915–930.
24.
ScullyG. W. (1989). The business of Major League Baseball (pp. 140–143). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
25.
VroomanJ. (1995). A general theory of professional sports leagues. Southern Economic Journal, 61, 971–990.
26.
VroomanJ. (1997). A unified theory of capital and labor markets in Major League Baseball. Southern Economic Journal, 63, 594–619.
27.
ZellnerA. (1962). An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests for aggregation bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 57, 348–368.
