Quirk and Fort’s gold plating hypothesis stipulates that subsidies are partly capitalized into stadia’ opulence. If the gold plating hypothesis is true, it would indicate that subsidies contribute to their own existence, as owners and major league executives argue subsidies are necessary to meet leagues’ increasing facility design standards. This study tests the gold plating hypothesis using a pooled cross section of stadia from the five major leagues. The findings confirm that subsidies increase stadia’ opulence. As evaluated at leagues’ mean stadia acreage, the marginal opulence of an additional US$1 million construction subsidy ranges from US$188,490 to US$501,420 depending on the league.
AhlfeldtG.MaennigW. (2009). Arenas, arena architecture and the impact on location desirability: The case of ‘Olympic Arenas’ in Prenzlauer Berg, Berlin. Urban Studies, 46, 1343–1362.
2.
AhlfeldtG.MaennigW. (2010). Stadium architecture and urban development from the perspective of urban economics. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34, 629–646.
3.
AlexanderD. L.KernW. (2004). The economic determinants of professional sports franchise values. Journal of Sports Economics, 5, 51–66.
4.
BaadeR. A. (2000). Home field advantage? Does the metropolis or neighborhood derive benefit from a professional sports stadium? In RichW. C. (Ed.), The economics and politics of sports facilities (pp. 71–89). Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
5.
BaadeR. A.MathesonV. A. (2012). Financing professional sports facilities. In WhiteS. B.KotvalZ. Z. (Eds.), Financing economic development in the 21st Century (2nd ed., pp. 323–342). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe Inc.
6.
BrownM.NagelM.McEvoyC.RascherD. (2004). Revenue and wealth maximization in the National Football League: The impact of stadia. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 13, 227–235.
7.
BrownM. T.RascherD. A.WardW. M. (2006). The use of public funds for private benefit: An examination of the relationship between public stadium funding and ticket prices in the National Football League. International Journal of Sport Finance, 1, 109–118.
8.
CarlinoG.CoulsonN. E. (2004). Compensating differentials and the social benefits of the NFL. Journal of Urban Economics, 56, 25–50.
9.
DanielsonM. N. (2001). Home team: Professional sports and the American metropolis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
DehringC. A.DepkenC. A.WardM. R. (2007). The impact of stadium announcements on residential property values: Evidence from a natural experiment in Dallas-Fort Worth. Contemporary Economic Policy, 25, 627–638.
11.
DepkenC. (2006). The impact of new stadia on professional baseball team finances. Public Finance & Management, 6, 436–474.
12.
FengX.HumphreysB. R. (2012). The impact of professional sports facilities on housing values: Evidence from Census block group data. City, Culture and Society, 3, 189–200.
13.
FortR. (2004). Subsidies as incentive mechanisms in sports. Managerial and Decision Economics, 25, 95–102.
14.
GyourkoJ.SaizA. (2006). Construction costs and the supply of housing structure. Journal of Regional Science, 46, 661–680.
15.
HumphreysB. R.HowardD. R. (Eds.). (2008). The business of sports: Economic perspectives on sport. Westport, CT: Praeger.
16.
HumphreysB. R.MondelloM. (2008). Determinants of franchise values in North American professional sports leagues: Evidence from a hedonic price model. International Journal of Sport Finance, 3, 98–105.
17.
LongJ. G. (2013). Public-private partnerships for major league sports facilities. New York, NY: Routledge.
18.
MillerP. A. (2007). Private financing and sports franchise values the case of Major League Baseball. Journal of Sports Economics, 8, 449–467.
19.
MillerP. A. (2009a). Facility age and ownership in major American team sports leagues: The effect on team franchise values. International Journal of Sport Finance, 4, 176–191.
20.
MillerP. A. (2009b). Subsidized monopolists and product prices: The case of Major League Baseball. Applied Economics, 41, 3249–3255.
21.
PollardR. (2002). Evidence of a reduced home advantage when a team moves to a new stadium. Journal of Sports Sciences, 20, 969–973.
22.
PopeC. R. (2000). The professional sports owner and the search for revenue: Analyzing the impact of new stadia on team quality, owner strategy, and consumer cost(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
23.
PorterP. K.ThomasC. R. (2010). Public subsidies and the location and pricing of sports. Southern Economic Journal, 76, 693–710.
24.
QuinnK.BursikP.BorickC.RaethzL. (2003). Do new digs mean more wins?Journal of Sports Economics, 4, 167–182.
25.
QuirkJ. P.FortR. D. (1997). Pay dirt: The business of professional team sports. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
RhodaB.WrigleyB.HabermasE. (2010). How to increase revenue as industry evolves. Sports Business Journal, 13, 28.
27.
RitzerG.StillmanT. (2001). The postmodern ballpark as a leisure setting: Enchantment and simulated de-McDonaldization. Leisure Sciences, 23, 99–113.
28.
ScellesN.HelleuB.DurandC.BonnalL. (2013). Determinants of professional sports firm values in the United States and Europe: A comparison between sports over the period 2004–2011. International Journal of Sports Finance, 8, 280–293.
29.
SchluebM. (2014, 41). City's soccer stadium construction deal gets OK. Orlando Sentinel, A1.
30.
ShapiroS.DeSchriverT.RascherD. A. (2012). Factors affecting the price of luxury suites in major North American sports facilities. Journal of Sport Management, 26, 249–257.
31.
TuC. C. (2005). How does a new sports stadium affect housing values? The case of FedEx Field. Land Economics, 81, 379–395.
