We consider managerial decision making by examining the impact of decisions taken by cricket captains on Twenty20 International (T20I) match outcomes. In particular, we examine whether pressure from external commentators is associated with suboptimal decision making by captains. Using data from over 300 T20I matches, we find little evidence that either winning the toss or choosing to bat first improves the likelihood of winning. Despite this, we find that captains in T20I cricket are significantly more likely to choose to bat rather than bowl after winning the toss, a finding that is consistent with social pressure constraining captains’ decision making.
AllsoppP. E.ClarkeS. R. (2004). Rating teams and analysing outcomes in one-day and test cricket. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 167, 657–667.
2.
BairdB. F. (1989). Managerial decisions under uncertainty: An introduction to the analysis of decision making. New York, NY: John Wiley.
3.
BakerM. J.NymanI. (2009). Competitive Pressure and Lying in Search Markets(Working Paper No. 426). New York, NY: Hunter College Department of Economics.
4.
BernheimB. D. (1994). A theory of conformity. Journal of Political Economy, 102, 841–877.
5.
BerriD. J.SimmonsR. (2009). Race and the evaluation of signal callers in the national football league. Journal of Sports Economics, 10, 23–43.
6.
BhaskarV. (2009). Rational adversaries? Evidence from randomised trials in one-day cricket. The Economic Journal, 119, 1–23.
7.
BoyleR.HaynesR. (2009). Power play: Sport, the media and popular culture. Edinburgh, Scotland: University Press Edinburgh.
8.
BrandenburgerA.PolakJ. (1996). When managers cover their posteriors: Making the decisions the market wants to see. RAND Journal of Economics, 27, 523–541.
9.
CamererC. F.LoewensteinG. (2004). Behavioral economics: Past, present, future. In CamererC. F.LoewensteinG.RabinM. (Eds.), Advances in behavioral economics (pp. 3–51). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
ClarkeS. R.AllsoppP. (2001). Fair measures of performance: The World Cup of Cricket. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 52, 471–479.
11.
CumminsJ. G.NymanI. (2005). The dark side of competitive pressure. RAND Journal of Economics, 36, 361–377.
12.
CumminsJ. G.NymanI. (2007). “Yes Men” in tournaments. (Working Paper No. 47). New York, NY: Hunter College Department of Economics.
13.
DawsonP.MorleyB.PatonD.ThomasD. (2009). To bat or not to bat: An examination of match outcomes in day-night limited overs cricket. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 60, 1786–1793.
14.
de SilvaB. M.SwartzT. B. (1997). Winning the coin toss and the home advantage in one-day international cricket matches. New Zealand Statistician, 32, 16–22.
15.
DuckworthF.LewisA. (1998). A fair method for resetting the target in interrupted one-day cricket matches. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 49, 220–227.
16.
DugganM.LevittS. D. (2002). Winning isn’t everything: Corruption in sumo wrestling. American Economic Review, 92, 1594–1605.
JonesT. (2004). Business economics and managerial decision making. Chichester, England: John Wiley.
20.
KoopG. (2008). Introduction to econometrics. Chichester, England: John Wiley.
21.
MorleyB.ThomasD. (2005). An investigation of home advantage and other factors affecting outcomes in English one-day cricket matches. Journal of Sports Sciences, 23, 261–268.
22.
NarayananM. P. (1985). Managerial incentives for short-term results. The Journal of Finance, 40, 1469–1484.
23.
NevillA. M.HolderR. L. (1999). Home advantage in sport: An overview of studies on the advantage of playing at home. Sports Medicine, 28, 221–236.
24.
WalkerM.WoodersJ. (2001). Minimax play at Wimbledon. The American Economic Review, 91, 1521–1538.
25.
WhannelG. (2006). Sport and the media. In CoakleyJ.DunningE. (Eds.), Handbook of sports studies (pp. 291–308). London, England: Sage.
