It is not unusual for baseball general managers (GMs) to have network ties to their potential trading partners, either to the other teams’ GMs or to the teams themselves. This article investigates whether these connections affect the degree of trading activity between specific team pairs. Estimates indicate that connections between GMs and commonalities between GMs enhance trade, although in absolute terms the effects are small. However, a GM simply having a professional tie to another team does not have any statistically significant effect. On the whole, our results are consistent with those found in the socioeconomic networking literature.
BeckmanC. M. (2006). The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 741–758.
2.
BesankoD. A.SimonD. (1985). Resource allocation in the baseball players’ labor market: An empirical investigation. Review of Business and Economic Research, 21, 71–84.
3.
CameronA. C.TrivediP. K. (1998). Regression analysis of count data. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
CoaseR. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1–144.
6.
CohenL. H.MalloyC. J.FrazziniA. (2010). Sell-side school ties. Journal of Finance65, 1409–1437.
7.
CombesP.LinnemerL.VisserM. (2008). Publish or peer-rich? The role of skills and networks in hiring economics professors. Labour Economics, 15, 423–441.
8.
CymrotD. J. (1983). Migration trends and earnings of free agents in major league baseball, 1976–1979. Economic Inquiry, 21, 545–556.
9.
DalyG.MooreW. J. (1981). Externalities, property rights, and the allocation of resources in major league baseball. Economic Inquiry, 19, 77–95.
10.
DicksonP. (2009). The Dickson baseball dictionary (3rd ed.). New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
11.
DrahozalC. R. (1986). The impact of free agency on the distribution of playing talent in major league baseball. Journal of Economics and Business, 38, 113–121.
12.
FortR.QuirkJ. (1995). Cross-subsidization, incentives, and outcomes in professional team sports leagues. Journal of Economic Literature, 33, 1265–1299.
13.
GranovetterM. (2005). The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 33–50.
14.
15.
HorowitzI. (1993). On the persistence of business alliances: The case of major league baseball trading patterns. Review of Industrial Organization, 8, 491–501.
16.
HwangB.KimS. (2009). It pays to have friends. Journal of Financial Economics, 93, 138–158.
17.
HylanT. R.LageM. J.TregliaM. (1996). The Coase theorem, free agency, and major league baseball: A panel study of pitcher mobility from 1961 to 1992. Southern Economic Journal, 62, 1029–1042.
18.
IsaacsonM. (2009). Sweet Lou: Lou Piniella, A life in baseball. Chicago, IL: Triumph Books.
KrautmannA. C. (2008). Qualifications to the Rottenberg invariance theorem. Journal of Sports Economics, 9, 88–95.
22.
KuhnenC. M. (2009). Business networks, corporate governance, and contracting in the mutual fund industry. Journal of Finance, 64, 2185–2220.
23.
LinM.ChangC. (2011). Testing Coase theorem: The case of free agency in NBA. Applied Economics, 43, 2545–2558.
24.
LiuY. (2008). Employment networks and the CEO labor market (Working Paper). Retrieved from SSRN website: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1361776
25.
MarburgerD. R. (2002). Property rights and unilateral player transfers in a multiconference sports league. Journal of Sports Economics, 3, 122–132.
26.
MaxcyJ. G. (2002). Rethinking restrictions on player mobility in major league baseball. Contemporary Economic Policy, 20, 145–159.
27.
McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL.CookJ. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.
28.
RottenbergS. (1956). The baseball players’ labor market. Journal of Political Economy, 64, 242–258.
29.
SiasP. M.CahillD. J. (1998). From coworkers to friends: The development of peer friendships in the workplace. Western Journal of Communication, 62, 273–299.
30.
SurdamD. G. (2006). The Coase theorem and player movement in major league baseball. Journal of Sports Economics, 7, 201–221.
31.
TsaiW.GhoshalS. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. The Academy of Management Journal, 41, 464–476.
32.
UzziB. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61, 674–698.
33.
UzziB.LancasterR. (2004). Embeddedness and the price of legal services in the large law firm market. American Sociological Review, 69, 319–344.
