Transparency is usually thought to reduce favoritism and corruption by facilitating monitoring by outsiders, but there is concern it can have the perverse effect of facilitating collusion by insiders. In response to vote trading scandals in the 1998 and 2002 Olympics, the International Skating Union (ISU) introduced a number of changes to its judging system, including obscuring which judge issued which mark. The stated intent was to disrupt collusion by groups of judges, but this change also frustrates most attempts by outsiders to monitor judge behavior. The author finds that the “compatriot-judge effect,” which aggregates favoritism (nationalistic bias from own-country judges) and corruption (vote trading), actually increased slightly after the reforms.
ArnoldD. (1983). Can inattentive citizens control their elected representatives? In DoddL. C.OppenheimerB. (Eds.), Congress reconsidered (5th ed., pp. 401–416). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
2.
ApplesonG. (2002, July 31). Man Arrested on Charges of Fixing Olympic Event. Reuters News.
3.
BassettG.PerskyJ. (1994). Rating skating. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89, 1075–1079.
4.
Bruine de BruinW. (2006). Save the last dance II: Unwanted serial position effects in figure skating judgments. Acta Psychologica, 123, 299–311.
5.
CampbellB.GalbraithJ. (1996). Nonparametric tests of the unbiasedness of Olympic figure-skating judgments. The Statistician, 45, 521–526.
6.
ChenJ. (2007). What does baseball teach us about reducing racial discrimination? Evidence from two natural experiments. Unpublished.
7.
CrockattJ. (2007, February 16). Corruption on Ice: The Sale-Pelletier Scandal is Only the Latest in a Long Line of Bad Judging. The Gazette (Montreal), pp. B7.
8.
DavisG.KimH. (2007). Business ties and proxy voting by mutual funds. Journal of Financial Economics, 85, 552–557.
9.
DohmenT. (2005). Social pressure influences decisions of individuals: Evidence from the behavior of football referees. IZA Discussion PaperNo. 1595.
10.
DugganM.LevittS. (2002). Winning isn’t everything: Corruption in sumo wrestling. American Economic Review, 92, 1594–1605.
11.
EmersonJ. (2007). Chance, on and off the ice. Chance, 20, 19-21.
12.
EmersonJ.ArnoldT. (2011). Statistical sleuthing by leveraging human nature: A study of Olympic figure skating. The American Statistician, 65, 143–148.
13.
EmersonJ.SeltzerM.LinD. (2009). Assessing judging bias: An example from the 2000 Olympic games. The American Statistician, 63, 124–131.
14.
GaricanoL.Palacios-HuertaI.PrendergastC. (2005). Favoritism under social pressure. Review of Economics and Statistics, 87, 208–216.
15.
GarrahanM. (2002, February 15). Olympic Committee Awards a Second Gold Medal. Financial Times.
16.
GordonS.TruchonM. (2008). Social change, optimal inference, and figure skating. Social Choice and Welfare, 30, 265–284.
MoulC.NyeJ. V. C. (2009). Did the soviets collude? A statistical analysis of championship chess, 1940-1978. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 70, 10–21.
20.
ParsonsC.SulaemanJ.YatesM.HamermeshD. (2011). Strike three: Umpires’ demand for discrimination. American Economic Review, 101, 1410–1435.
21.
PetersenM. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies, 22, 435–480.
22.
PrendergastC. (1993). A theory of ‘yes men’. American Economic Review, 83, 757–770.
23.
PriceJ.RemerM.StoneD. (2012). Sub-perfect game: Profitable biases of NBA referees. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 21, 271-300.
24.
PriceJ.WolfersJ. (2010). Racial discrimination among NBA referees. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125, 1859–1887.
25.
REGNUM News Agency. (2006, June 21). Russia to Suggest Reform of Figure Skating Judging.
26.
SalaB.ScottJ.SpriggsJ. (2007). The cold war on ice: Constructivism and the politics of olympic skating judging. Perspectives on Politics, 5, 17–29.
27.
SeltzerR.GlassW. (1991). International politics and judging in Olympic skating events: 1968-1988. Journal of Sports Behavior, 14, 189–200.
28.
SmithB. (2008, October 10). Judging Panels to Shrink at Major Championships, Including Next Olympics; Figure Skating: New Rules Raise Old Concerns About Mark Manipulation. Globe and Mail, pp. S1.
29.
StiglerG. (1964). A theory of oligopoly. Journal of Political Economy, 72, 44–61.
30.
WolfersJ. (2006). Point shaving: Corruption in NCAA basketball. American Economic Review, 96, 279–283.
31.
WuS.YangM. (2004). Evaluation of the current decision rule in figure skating and possible improvements. The American Statistician, 58, 46–54.
32.
ZitzewitzE. (2002). Nationalistic bias in winter sports judging and its lessons for organizational decision making(Stanford GSB Working Paper No. 1796).
33.
ZitzewitzE. (2006). Nationalistic bias in winter sports judging and its lessons for organizational decision making. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 15, 67–99.
