Reply to Szymanski’s “Some Observations on Fort and Winfree ‘Nash Conjectures and Talent Supply in Sports League Modeling: A Comment on Current Modeling Disagreements.’”
Restricted accessOtherFirst published online June, 2013
Reply to Szymanski’s “Some Observations on Fort and Winfree ‘Nash Conjectures and Talent Supply in Sports League Modeling: A Comment on Current Modeling Disagreements.’”
EckardE. W. (2006). Comment: Professional team sports are only a game: The Walrasian fixed-supply conjecture model, contest-Nash equilibrium, and the invariance principle. Journal of Sports Economics, 7, 234–239.
2.
El HodiriM.QuirkJ. (1971). An economic model of a professional sports league. Journal of Political Economy, 79, 1302–1319.
3.
FortR.QuirkJ. (1995). Cross subsidization, incentives and outcomes in professional team sports leagues. Journal of Economic Literature, XXXIII, 1265–1299.
4.
FortR.WinfreeJ. (2009). Sports really are different: The contest success function and the supply of talent. Review of Industrial Organization, 34, 69–80.
5.
SzymanskiS. (2004). Professional team sports are only a game: The Walrasian fixed supply conjecture model, contest-Nash equilibrium and the invariance principle. Journal of Sports Economics, 5, 111–126.
6.
SzymanskiS. (2012). Some observations on Fort and Winfree’s ‘Nash conjectures and talent supply in sports league modeling: A comment on current modeling disagreements. Journal of Sports Economics, doi: 10.1177/1527002512439883.
7.
SzymanskiS.KesenneS. (2004). Competitive balance and gate revenue sharing in team sports. Journal of Industrial Economics, LII, 165–177.
8.
VroomanJ. (1995). A general theory of professional sports leagues. Southern Economic Journal, 61, 971–990.
9.
WinfreeJ.FortR. (2011, May 6). Nash conjectures and talent supply in sports league modeling: A comment on current modeling disagreements. Journal of Sports Economics, doi:10.1177/1527002511401412.
