The article models the upset—a low-probability outcome of a periodic competition. It is assumed that the upset is an independent component of consumer preferences, whose marginal willingness to pay grows with time. The decision rule for a league on upset timing is a competitive-balance problem but is unlike standard models of competitive balance. Upset timing is likened partially to the optimal redemption time of a growing asset, and implications for competitive balance in this environment are derived.
FalterJ.PerignonC.VercruysseO. (2008). Impact of overwhelming joy on consumer demand: The case of a Soccer World Cup Victory. Journal of Sports Economics, 9, 20–42.
3.
ForrestD.SimmonsR.BuraimoB. (2005). Outcome uncertainty and the couch potato audience. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 52, 641–661.
4.
FortR.QuirkJ. (1995). Cross-subsidization, incentives and outcomes in professional team sports leagues. Journal of Economic Literature, 33, 1265–1299.
5.
HirshleiferJ. (1970). Investment, interest, and capital.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
6.
El-HodiriM.QuirkJ. (1971). An economic model of a professional sports league. Journal of Political Economy, 79, 1302–1319.
7.
KnowlesG.SheronyK.HaupertM. (1992). The demand for Major League Baseball: A test of the uncertainty of outcome hypothesis. The American Economist, 36, 72–80.
8.
KrautmannA. C.HadleyL. (2006). Dynasties versus pennant races: Competitive balance in Major League Baseball. Managerial and Decision Economics, 27, 287–292.
9.
KrugmanP. (1980). Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade. American Economic Review, 70, 950–959.
10.
LeeY. H.FortR. (2008). Attendance in the uncertainty-of-outcome hypothesis in baseball. Review of Industrial Organization, 33, 281–295.
11.
MasonD. S. (1999). What is the sports product and who buys it? The marketing of professional sports leagues. European Journal of Marketing, 33, 402–419.
12.
QuirkJ.FortR. D. (1992). Pay dirt: The business of professional team sports.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13.
SamuelsonP. A. (1976). Economics of forestry in an evolving society. Economic Inquiry, 14, 466–492.
14.
SzymanskiS. (2001). Income inequality, competitive balance, and the attractiveness of team sports: Some evidence and a natural experiment from English soccer. Economic Journal, 111, F69–F84.
15.
VroomanJ. (2009). Theory of the perfect game: Competitive balance in monopoly sports leagues. Review of Industrial Organization, 34, 5–44.
