The authors develop a model to investigate potential biases of inherent characteristics in betting markets. The test requires only that there be both a sides (“spread”) market and a totals (“over/under”) market for the game. The authors utilize the model to test for the well-documented “home-underdog” bias in the National Football League (NFL). They show that the bias specifically favors the offense (or defense) of home underdogs (away-favorites), with no bias against the offense (defense) of away favorites (home-underdogs).
BorgehsiR.DareW. (2009). A test of the widespread-point-shaving theory. Finance Research Letters, 6, 115–121.
2.
DareW.HollandS. (2004). Efficiency in the NFL betting market: Modifying and consolidating research methods. Applied Economics, 36, 9–15.
3.
GolecJ.TamarkinM. (1991). The degree of inefficiency in the football betting market. Journal of Financial Economics, 30, 311–323.
4.
SauerR. (1998). The economics of wagering markets. Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 2021–2064.
5.
WoodlandB.WoodlandL. (1994). Market efficiency and the favorite-longshot bias: The baseball betting market. Journal of Finance, 49, 269–280.
6.
WoodlandB.WoodlandL. (2001). Market efficiency and profitable wagering in the National Hockey League: Can bettors score on longshots?. Southern Economic Journal, 67, 983–996.
7.
WoodlandB.WoodlandL. (2003). The reverse favourite-longshot bias and market efficiency in Major League Baseball: An update. Bulletin of Economic Research, 55, 113–124.
8.
WolfersJ. (2006). Point Shaving: Corruption in NCAA Basketball. American Economic Review, 96, 279–283.
